Advertisement

Over 100 years of faults interaction, stress accumulation, and creeping implications, on Chaman Fault System, Pakistan

  • Muhammad Shahid RiazEmail author
  • Shan Bin
  • Shahid Naeem
  • Wang Kai
  • Zujun Xie
  • Syed Mushhad M. Gilani
  • Umer Ashraf
Original Paper

Abstract

The curve-shaped Chaman transform fault between Pakistan and Afghanistan demarks the western boundary of the Indian plate, which is the locus of many catastrophic earthquakes, and this is poorly studied region to understand the earthquake/fault interaction and hazard assessment. Based on earthquake triggering theory, we investigate a sequence of earthquakes comprising five earthquakes that occurred in the Chaman Fault System since 1892. Our results elucidate that three out of four earthquakes are triggered by the preceding earthquakes. The 1935 earthquake of magnitude Mw 7.7 is somewhat an independent earthquake in this sequence, slightly influenced by the 1892 event. The 1935 earthquake significantly loaded either terminus of its rupture with positive stress, which later triggered the 1975 earthquake with 35% of its rupture length where ΔCFS is above triggering threshold value, and 1990 earthquake with 44% of its rupture length in positive stress lobe, on Ghazaband Fault, in the south lobe. Since the 1935 earthquake significantly increased the ΔCFS on either terminus of its rupture, the 2013 earthquake with magnitude Mw 7.7 occurred on Hoshab Fault in the positive stress zone with 23% of its rupture length where ΔCFS is positive. Moreover, the northern locked segment of CF, the southern segment of GBF, southeastern segment of HF and PAF demonstrate a high value of ΔCFS. It could trigger seismicity in these regions, thus requiring arrangements to mitigate any seismic hazards in future.

Keywords

Chaman Fault System Earthquake triggering Fault interaction Coulomb stress Seismic hazard assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. Y311141014). Figures were prepared using the Generic Mapping Tools (Wessel and Smith, 1998). Muhammad Shahid Riaz is deeply thankful to CAS-TWAS President’s scholarship program for providing research fellowship. We thank the Editor in Chief, Prof. Wolf-Christian Dullo, IJES, Topic Editor, David McNamara, and anonymous reviewer(s) who helped us to improve the quality of this research work.

Supplementary material

531_2019_1710_MOESM1_ESM.doc (2.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 2101 kb)

References

  1. Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative Seismology 2nd edn. University Science Books, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys N, Bilham R (2003) Earthquakes and associated deformation in northern Baluchistan 1892–2001. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93(4):1573–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asrarullah ZA, Abbas SG (1979) Ophiolites in Pakistan: an introduction. In: Farah A, Dejong KA (eds) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Quetta, Geological Survey of Pakistan, pp 181–192Google Scholar
  4. Avouac J-P, Ayoub F, Wei S, Ampuero J-P, Meng L, Leprince S, Jolivet R, Duputel Z, Helmberger D (2014) The 2013, M w 7.7 Balochistan earthquake, energetic strike-slip reactivation of a thrust fault. Earth Planet Sci Lett 391:128–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.01.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnhart WD (2017) Fault creep rates of the Chaman fault (Afghanistan and Pakistan) inferred from InSAR. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122:372–386.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnhart WD, Hayes GP, Briggs RW, Gold RD, Bilham R (2014) Ball-and-socket tectonic rotation during the 2013 Balochistan earthquake, Earth Planet. Sci Lett 403:210–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2014.07.001 Google Scholar
  7. Bilham R, Lodi S, Hough S, Bukhary S, Khan AM, Rafeeqi SFA (2007) Seismic hazard in Karachi, Pakistan: uncertain past, uncertain future. Seismol Res Lett 78(6):601–613.  https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.78.6.601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng J, Sykes LR (1996) Triggering of 1812 Santa Barbara earthquake by a great San Andreas shock: implications for future seismic hazards in southern California. Geophys Res Lett 23:1155–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL00738 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fattahi H, Amelung F (2016) InSAR observations of strain accumulation and fault creep along the Chaman fault system, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070121 Google Scholar
  10. Freed AM (2005) Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic and postseismic stress transfer. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:335–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gansser A (1979) Reconnaissance visit to the ophiolites in Baluchistan and the Himalaya. In: Farah A, Dejong KA (eds) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan, Quetta, pp 193–213Google Scholar
  12. Harris RA, Simpson RW (1998) Suppression of large earthquakes by stress shadows: a comparison of Coulomb and rate-and-state failure. J Geophys Res 103:24439–24451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harris RA, Simpson RW, Reasenberg PA (1995) Influence of static stress changes on earthquake locations in southern California. Nature 375:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heidbach O, Ben-Avraham A (2007) Stress evolution and seismic hazard of the Dead Sea fault system, Earth Planet. Sci Lett 257:299–312Google Scholar
  15. International Seismological Centre (2014) On-line Bulletin. Internatl. Seismol. Cent., Thatcham, United Kingdom. http://www.isc.ac.uk. Accessed 31 July 2017
  16. Jolivet R et al (2014) The 2013 M w 7.7 Balochistan earthquake: seismic potential of an accretionary wedge. Bull Seismol Soc Am 104(2):1020–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones AG (1960) Reconnaissance geology of part of West Pakistan, a Colombo plan co-operative project. Hunting Survey Corporation Ltd., Government of Canada, Toronto, p 550Google Scholar
  18. King GCP, Stein RS, Lin J (1994) Static stress changes and the triggering of earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:935–953Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence RD, Yeats RS (1979) Geological reconnaissance of the Chaman Fault in Pakistan. In: Farah A, DeJong KA (eds) Geodynamics of Pakistan. Geological Survey of Pakistan, Quetta, pp 351–357Google Scholar
  20. Lawrence RD, Khan SH, Dejong KA, Farah A, Yeats RS (1981) Thrust and strike-slip fault interaction along the Chaman transform zone, Pakistan. In: McClay K, Price NJ (eds) Thrust and Nappe tectonics. The Geological Society, London, pp 363–370Google Scholar
  21. Nalbant SS, Steacy S, McCloskey J, Sieh K, Natawidjaja D (2005) Earthquake risk on the Sunda trench. Nature 435(7043):756–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pollitz F, Vergnolle M, Calais E (2003) Fault interaction and stress triggering of twentieth century earthquakes in Mongolia. J Geophys Res 108(B10):2503.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Quittmeyer RC, Jacob KH (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, northwestern India, and southeastern Iran. Bull Seismol Soc Am 69(3):773–823Google Scholar
  24. Scholz CH (1990) The Mechanics of earthquakes and faulting. Cambridge Univ Press, New York, p 439Google Scholar
  25. Shan B, Xiong X, Wang RJ, Zheng Y, Yang S (2013) Coulomb stress evolution along Xianshuihe–Xiaojiang fault system since 1713 and its interaction with Wenchuan earthquake, May 12, 2008. Earth Planet Sci Lett 377–378(5):199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh DD, Gupta HK (1980) Source dynamics of two great earthquakes of the Indian subcontinent: the Bihar-Nepal earthquake of January 15, 1934 and the Quetta earthquake of May 30, 1935. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70(3):757–773Google Scholar
  27. Stein RS (2003) Earthquake conversations. Sci Am 288:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szeliga W, Bilham R, Kakar DM, Lodi SH (2012) Interseismic strain accumulation along the western boundary of the Indian subcontinent. J Geophys Res, Solid Earth 117:B08404.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008822 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tapponnier P, Mattauer M, Proust F, Cassaigneau C (1981) Mesozoic ophiolites, sutures, and large-scale tectonic movements in Afghanistan. Earth Planet Sci Lett 52(2):355–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(81)90189-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Toda S, Stein RS, Reasonberg PA, Dieterich JH (1998) Stress transferred by the M w = 6.5 Kobe, Japan, shock: effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities. J Geophys Res 103:24543–24565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Verdecchia A, Carena S (2015) 150 years of coulomb stress history along the California-Nevada border, USA. Tectonics 34:213–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang R, Lorenzo-Martín F, Roth F (2006) PSGRN/PSCMP—a new code for calculating co- and post-seismic deformation, geoid and gravity changes based on the viscoelastic-gravitational dislocation theory. Comput Geosci 32:527–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seism Soc Am 84:974–1002Google Scholar
  34. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New improved version of generic mapping tools released. Eos Trans AGU 79:579.  https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong X, Shan B, Zhou YM, Wei SJ, Li YD, Wang RJ, Zheng Y (2017) Coulomb stress transfer and accumulation on the Sagaing Fault, Myanmar, over the past 110 years and its implications for seismic hazard. Geophys Res Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl072770 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geologische Vereinigung e.V. (GV) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s DynamicsInstitute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of SciencesWuhanChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Geophysics and GeomaticsChina University of GeosciencesWuhanChina
  4. 4.Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth (RADI), Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  5. 5.Centre for Earthquake Studies, NCPIslamabadPakistan
  6. 6.University Institute of Information Technology (UIIT), PMAS-Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations