Advertisement

Three-dimensional seismic sedimentology and stratigraphic architecture of prograding clinoforms, central Taranaki Basin, New Zealand

  • Maximilian Franzel
  • Stefan BackEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) seismic-reflection analysis of a major Miocene-to-Pleistocene (c. 19–2 Ma) clinoform succession of the central Taranaki Basin offshore New Zealand reveals two distinct intervals of downbuilding progradation (c. 7.5–6 Ma; and c. 4–2 Ma). Downbuilding clinoforms are of kilometre scale and characterized by straight upper foreset gullies that initiate near or at the clinoform breakpoint, in places connected to topset distributary channels. Foreset mass-transport complexes occur mainly in the basal parts of downbuilding clinoform successions. Upbuilding progradational clinoforms formed between c. 6–5.5 Ma and c. 4.5–4 Ma. These clinoforms are generally smaller, with topsets in places comprising beach ridges and tidal channels. The foresets of the upbuilding clinoforms contain large gullies and sinuous deepwater channels, locally connected to topset channels. Retrogradational deposits in the studied succession (c. 5.5–4.5 Ma) lack a distinct clinoform geometry, show a few slope channels and gullies, and are characterized by extensive landward-stepping networks of shallow-marine and fluvial channels. 3D seismic-reflection analysis of the c. 2000 km2 study area allows an exemplary 3D documentation of migrating depositional systems along a highly progradational clastic margin, constrained by a stratigraphic framework tightly defined by the two intervals of major depositional downbuilding. The Late Miocene downbuilding is interpreted as forced by tectonic uplift along the Cape Egmont fault and neighbouring structures in the south of the study area. In contrast, the Plio-Pleistocene downbuilding is interpreted as dominantly controlled by eustasy in a tectonic environment characterized by subsidence. Excellent preservation of the 4–2 Ma clinoform topsets provides unique insights into depositional systems at and above the shelf break imaging palaeo-shoreline and palaeo-backshore environments. The detailed 3D clinoform analyses presented contribute to the understanding of clastic sedimentation processes from shelf to slope, which can be used to predict deepwater depositional facies.

Keywords

Clinoform 3D seismic-reflection analysis Taranaki Basin Downbuilding Sequence stratigraphy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank New Zealand Petroleum & Minerals of the New Zealand Government for providing seismic and borehole data in the New Zealand Petroleum Exploration Data Packs 2015 and 2017. The manuscript significantly benefitted from the thorough and very constructive reviews of Dominic Strogen and Peter Kamp. Eliis is gratefully acknowledged for providing the software Paleoscan under an Academic License Agreement; Seismic Micro-Technology (IHS) is gratefully acknowledged for providing the KingdomSuite + under an Educational User License Agreement.

Supplementary material

531_2018_1663_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (15.8 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 16200 KB)

References

  1. Anell I, Midtkanal I (2015) The quantifiable clinothem—types, shapes and geometric relationships in the Plio-Pleistocene Giant Foresets Formation, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Basin Res 29:277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AWE (2006) Tieke-1 Well Completion Report, New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd. Petroleum Report Series PR 3513, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand: 786Google Scholar
  3. Baur JR, King PR, Stern T, Leitner B (2011) Development and seismic geomorphology of a miocene slope channel megasystem, Offshore Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. In: Seismic Imaging of Depositional and Geomorphic Systems: 30th Annual Research Conference Proceedings, Houston, Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists, vol 30, pp 618–649Google Scholar
  4. Beggs J (1990) Seismic stratigraphy of the plio-pleistocene Giant Foresets, Western platform, Taranaki Basin. In: 1989 New Zealand Oil Exploration Conference Proceedings, Ministry of Commerce, pp 201–207Google Scholar
  5. Bull S, Strogen DP, Seebeck H, Zhu H, Hill MG, Arnot MJ, Kroeger KF (2016) Seismic reflection interpretation, static modelling and velocity modelling of the southern Taranaki Basin (4D Taranaki Project). GNS Science Report 2:74Google Scholar
  6. Burgess PM (2016) The future of the sequence stratigraphy paradigm: dealing with a variable third dimension. Geology 44:335–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bussell M (1994) Seismic interpretation of the Moki Formation on the Maui 3D survey, Taranaki Basin. In: 1994 New Zealand Petroleum Conference Proceedings, pp 240–255Google Scholar
  8. Campbell H, Malahoff A, Browne G, Graham I, Sutherland R (2012) New Zealand Geology. Episodes 35:57–71Google Scholar
  9. Cande SC, Stock JM (2004) Pacific-Antarctic-Australia motion and the formation of the Macquarie Plate. Geophys J Int 157:399–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cartwright J, Huuse M (2005) 3D seismic technology: the geological ‘Hubble’. Basin Res 17:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Catuneanu O (2006) Principles of sequence stratigraphy, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 375Google Scholar
  12. Catuneanu O, Abreu V, Bhattacharya JP, Blum MD, Dalrymple RW, Eriksson PG, Fielding CR, Fisher WL, Galloway WE, Gibling MR, Giles KA, Holbrook JM, Jordan R, Kendall CGSC, Macurda B, Martinsen OJ, Miall AD, Neal JE, Nummedal D, Pomar L, Posamentier HW, Pratt BR, Sarg JF, Shanley KW, Steel RJ, Strasser A, Tucker ME, Winker C (2009) Towards the standardization of sequence stratigraphy. Earth Sci Rev 92:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Crowhurst PV, Green PF, Kamp PJJ (2002) Appraisal of (U-Th)/He apatite thermochronology as a thermal history tool for hydrocarbon exploration: an example from the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. AAPG Bull 86:1801–1819Google Scholar
  14. Downunder G (2013) Kokako 3D MSS processing report, NZOG Offshore Ltd., Ministry of business, innovation and employment New Zealand. Pet Rep PR4873:31Google Scholar
  15. Fahmy WA, Matteucci G, Butters D, Zhang J, Castagna J (2005) Successful application of spectral decomposition technology toward drilling of a key offshore development well. In: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2005, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 262–264Google Scholar
  16. Giba M, Nicol A, Walsh JJ (2010) Evolution of faulting and volcanism in a back-arc basin and its implications for subduction processes. Tectonics.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009TC002634 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giba M, Walsh JJ, Nicol A (2012) Segmentation and growth of an obliquely reactivated normal fault. J Struct Geol 39:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giba M, Walsh JJ, Nicol A, Mouslopoulou V, Seebeck H (2013) Investigation of the spatio-temporal relationship between normal faulting and arc volcanism on million-year time scales. J Geol Soc Lond 170:951–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen RJ, Kamp PJJ (2002) Evolution of the Giant Foresets Formation, northern Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. In: Proceedings of New Zealand Petroleum Conference 2002, 24–27 February, Crown Minerals, Ministry of Economic Development, Wellington, pp 419–435Google Scholar
  20. Hansen RJ, Kamp PJJ (2006) Sequence stratigraphy and architectural elements of the Giant Foresets Formation, northern Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. In: Proceedings of New Zealand Petroleum Conference 2006, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  21. Hardenbol J, Thierry J, Farley MB, Jacquin T, De Graciansky PC, Vail P (1998) Mesozoic and cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework of European Basins. In: Graciansky PC et al (ed) Mesozoic and cenozoic sequence stratigraphy of European basins. SEPM Special Publication, Tulsa, vol 60, pp 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayward BW (1990) Use of foraminferal data in analysis of Taranaki Basin. N Z J Foraminifer Res 20:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helland-Hansen W, Hampson GJ (2009) Trajectory analysis: concepts and applications. Basin Res 21:454–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson J, Purves SJ, Leppard C (2007) Automated delineation of geological elements from 3D seismic data through analysis of multichannel, volumetric spectral decomposition data. First Break 25:87–93Google Scholar
  25. Henderson J, Purves SJ, Fisher G, Leppard C (2008) Delineation of geological elements from RGB color blending of seismic attribute volumes. Lead Edge 27:342–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holt WE, Stern TA (1994) Subduction, platform subsidence, and foreland thrust loading: The late Tertiary development of Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Tectonics 13:1068–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hornibrook NDB, Hoskins R (1969) The Micropaleontology of Maui-1 offshore well, in ‘Maui-1 Well Resume’, Shell BP and Todd Oil Services Ltd., Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand. Pet Rep PR2830:110–118Google Scholar
  28. Hunt D, Tucker ME (1992) Stranded parasequences and the forced regressive wedge systems tract: Deposition during base-level fall. Sed Geol 81:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kamp PJJ, Green PF (1990) Thermal and tectonic history of selected Taranaki Basin (New Zealand) wells assessed by apatite fission track analysis. AAPG Bull 74:1401–1419Google Scholar
  30. Kamp PJJ, Green PF, White SH (1989) Fission track analysis reveals character of collisional tectonics in New Zealand. Tectonics 8:168–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. King PR (2000) Tectonic reconstructions of New Zealand 40 Ma to the present. NZ J Geol Geophys 43:611–638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King PR, Thrasher GP (1996) Cretaceous-Cenozoic geology and petroleum systems of the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Inst Geol Nucl Sci Lower Hutt Monogr 13:241Google Scholar
  33. King PR, Naish TR, Browne GH, Field BD, Edbrooke SW (eds) (1999) Cretaceous to Recent sedimentary patterns in New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, NZ, Folio Series, p 1Google Scholar
  34. Li F, Qi J, Marfurt K (2015) Attribute mapping of variable-thickness incised valley-fill systems. Lead Edge 34:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lutz J, Zelt KH, Klaassen M, Strom GB (1993) The processing of the Maui New Zealand 3D marine survey, Shell Todd Oil Services Limited, Ministry of Economic development New Zealand. Pet Rep PR2300: 89Google Scholar
  36. Mcardle NJ, Ackers MA (2012) Understanding seismic thin-bed responses using frequency decomposition and RGB blending. First Break 30: 57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller KG, Kominz MA, Browning JV, Wright JD, Mountain GS, Katz ME, Sugarman PJ, Cramer BS, Christie-Blick N, Pekar SF (2005) The phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Science 310:1293–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgans H (2006) Foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the early miocene to pleistocene sequences in Witiora-1, Taimana-1, Arawa-1 and Okoki-1. GNS Sci Rep 37:38Google Scholar
  39. Mouslopoulou V, Nicol A, Walsh JJ, Begg JG, Townsend DB, Hristopulos DT (2012) Fault-slip accumulation in an active rift over thousands to millions of years and the importance of paleoearthquake sampling. J Struct Geol 36:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naish T, Kamp PJJ (1997) Sequence stratigraphy of sixth-order (41 k.y.) Pliocene–Pleistocene cyclothems, Wanganui basin, New Zealand: A case for the regressive systems tract. GSA Bull 109:978–999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neal JE, Abreu V (2009) Sequence stratigraphy hierarchy and the accommodation succession method. Geology 37:779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neal JE, Abreu V, BOHACS KM, FELDMAN HR, PEDERSON KH (2016) Accommodation succession (δA/δS) sequence stratigraphy: observational method, utility and insights into sequence boundary formation. J Geol Soc Lond 173:803–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nicol A, Walsh J, Berryman K, Nodder S (2005) Growth of a normal fault by the accumulation of slip over millions of years. J Struct Geol 27:327–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. NZEP (2015) New Zealand Petroleum Exploration Data Pack. New Zealand Petroleum & Minerals, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  45. NZEP (2017) New Zealand Petroleum Exploration Data Pack. New Zealand Petroleum & Minerals, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. NZOP (2004) Pateke-2 Well Completion Report, New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd. Petroleum Report Series PR 2994, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand: 842Google Scholar
  47. Partyka G, Gridley J, Lopez J (1999) Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization. Lead Edge 18:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pilaar WFH, Wakefield LL (1978) Structural and stratigraphic evolution of the Taranaki Basin, offshore North Island, New Zealand. APPEA J 18:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Plint AG, Nummedal D (2000) The falling stage systems tract: recognition and importance in sequence stratigraphic analysis. In: Hunt D, Gawthorpe RL (eds) Sedimentary responses to forced regression. Geological Society Special Publications, London, vol 172, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  50. Posamentier HW, Morris WR (2000) Aspects of the stratal architecture of forced regressive deposits. Geological Society Special Publications, London, vol 172, pp 19–46Google Scholar
  51. Reilly C, Nicol A, Walsh JJ, Seebeck H (2015) Evolution of faulting and plate boundary deformation in the Southern Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Tectonophysics 651–652:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reilly C, Nicol A, Walsh JJ, Kroeger K (2016) Temporal changes of fault seal and early charge of the Maui Gas-condensate field, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Mar Pet Geol 70:237–250Google Scholar
  53. Roncaglia L, Milner M, Baur J, Fohrmann M, Kroeger K, Strogen D, Zhu H, Arnot M, Bland K, Bushe H, Funnell R, Ilg B, Jones C, King P, Leitner B, Massey M, Morgans HEG, Reid E (2010) Procedures and metadata protocols used in modelling Taranaki Basin petroleum systems: guidelines from a pilot case study in the Kupe area. GNS Sci Rep 49:70Google Scholar
  54. Salazar M, Moscardelli L, Wood L (2016) Utilising clinoform architecture to understand the drivers of basin margin evolution: a case study in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand. Basin Res 28:840–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schröder AG (1970) The micropaleontology of Maui-2 offshore well, in Well Resume Maui-2, Shell BP & Todd Oil Services Ltd. Petroleum Report Series PR 541, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand, pp 59–65Google Scholar
  56. Scott GH, King PR, Crundwell MP (2004) Recognition and interpretation of depositional units in a late Neogene progradational shelf margin complex, Taranaki Basin, New Zealand: foraminiferal data compared with seismic facies and wireline logs. Sed Geol 164:55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shumaker LE, Jobe ZR, Graham SA (2017) Evolution of submarine gullies on a prograding slope: Insights from 3D seismic reflection data. Mar Geol 393:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stagpoole V, Nicol A (2008) Regional structure and kinematic history of a large subduction back thrust; Taranaki Fault, New Zealand. J Geophys Res 113:B01403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. STOS (1970) Well resume Maui-2. New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd., Petroleum Report Series PR 541, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand, 143Google Scholar
  60. Stow DAV, Reading HG, Collinson JD (1996) Deep Seas. In: Reading HG (ed) Sedimentary environments: processes, facies and stratigraphy, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 395–453Google Scholar
  61. Strogen DP (2011) Updated paleogeographic maps for the Taranaki Basin and surrounds. GNS Sci Rep 2010, 83Google Scholar
  62. Strogen DP, King PR (2014) A new Zealandia-wide seismic horizon naming scheme. GNS Sci Rep 34:20Google Scholar
  63. Strogen DP, Seebeck H, Nicol A, King PR (2017) Two-phase Cretaceous–Paleocene rifting in the Taranaki Basin region, New Zealand; implications for Gondwana break-up. J Geol Soc 174:929–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stroud T, Miller D, Fancher I, Ward S, Mills K (2003) Tui-1 Well Completion Report, New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd. Petroleum Report Series PR 2784, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand, p 1737Google Scholar
  65. Stroud T, Miller D, Leask B (2004) Amokura-1 Well Completion Report, New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd. Petroleum Report Series PR 2920, Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand, p 1441Google Scholar
  66. Sutherland R (1999) Cenozoic bending of New Zealand basement terranes and Alpine Fault displacement: A brief review. NZ J Geol Geophys 42:295–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tippett JM, Kamp PJJ (1993) Fission track analysis of the late Cenozoic vertical kinematics of continental Pacific Crust, South Island, New Zealand. J Geophys Res 98:16119–16148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Veritas DGCA (2003) Tui 3D seismic survey, New Zealand Overseas Petroleum Ltd., Ministry of Economic Development New Zealand. Pet Rep PR2830:1683Google Scholar
  69. Wood RA, Stagpoole VM (2007) Validation of tectonic reconstructions by crustal volume balance: New Zealand through the Cenozoic. Geol Soc Am Bull 119:933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geological Institute, Energy and Mineral Resources GroupRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations