Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Issue 12, pp 8661–8680 | Cite as

Presentation of a new hybrid approach for forecasting economic growth using artificial intelligence approaches

  • Mohsen AhmadiEmail author
  • Saeid Jafarzadeh-Ghoushchi
  • Rahim Taghizadeh
  • Abbas Sharifi
Original Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents a new hybrid algorithm for forecasting economic growth using indicators of knowledge-based economy (KBE). The algorithm consists of three steps, namely preprocessing, processing, and postprocessing. Preprocessing consists of principal component analysis and reproduction algorithm, which are used to decrease the number of variables and increase the volume of data. Economic growth is predicted during processing using multilayer perceptron (MLP), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inferences system, and gene expression programming (GEP). The variables are added separately to the process. The best model is selected during the postprocessing step to forecast economic growth. GEP model is used to forecast unique indicators. The last step involves substitution of forecasted indicators in the best model. In this study, the KBE indicators of Iran from 1993 to 2013 are predicted in the processing step. The MLP model is used, which includes four indicators, namely technological foundation, structure of trained manpower, export and trademark, and employee. Indicators are also forecasted using the GEP model between 2013 and 2020. The results are used to estimate economic growth between forecasting periods. A self-organizing map is used to recognize relationships between variables. The results show the efficiency of the algorithm in multivariate forecasting.

Keywords

Hybrid forecasting Artificial neural network Gene expression programming Economy growth 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Chen DHC, Dahlman CJ (2004) Knowledge and development: a cross-section approach, vol 3366. World Bank Publications, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caraveli H, Tsionas E, Darzentas J (2008) EU growth, convergence and the knowledge economy: an empirical investigation. J Econ Asymmetries 5(2):105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang W, Wu Zm, Yang Gk (2004) Genetic programming-based chaotic time series modeling. J Zhejiang Univ Sci 5(11):1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ilonen J, Kamarainen JK, Puumalainen K, Sundqvist S, Kälviäinen H (2006) Toward automatic forecasts for diffusion of innovations. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(2):182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee KC, Lee N, Lee H (2012) Multi-agent knowledge integration mechanism using particle swarm optimization. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(3):469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong A, Sarkar S (2015) Forecasting technological progress potential based on the complexity of product knowledge. Technol Forecast Soc Change 90, Part B:599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baffigi A, Golinelli R, Parigi G (2004) Bridge models to forecast the euro area GDP. Int J Forecast 20(3):447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shami AA, Lotfi A, Coleman S, Dostál P (2015) Unified knowledge based economy hybrid forecasting. Technol Forecast Soc Change 91:107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Urbancová H, Vnoučková L, Laboutková Š (2016) Knowledge transfer in a knowledge-based economy. Bus Adm Manag 19(2):73.  https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2016-2-005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khandelwal V (2015) Impact of energy consumption, GDP and fiscal deficit on public health expenditure in India: an ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Proc 75:2658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aslan A (2014) Causality between electricity consumption and economic growth in Turkey: an ARDL bounds testing approach. Energy Econ Lett 9(1):25MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pradhan RP, Norman NR, Badir Y, Samadhan B (2013) Transport infrastructure, foreign direct investment and economic growth interactions in India: the ARDL bounds testing approach. Proc Soc Behav Sci 104:914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papageorgiou T, Michaelides PG, Tsionas EG (2016) Business cycle determinants and fiscal policy: a panel ARDL approach for EMU. J Econ Asymmetries 13:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bai A, Hira S, Deshpande PS (2015) An application of factor analysis in the evaluation of country economic rank. Proc Comput Sci 54:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mostafa MM, El-Masry AA (2016) Oil price forecasting using gene expression programming and artificial neural networks. Econ Model 54:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dabhi VK, Chaudhary S (2016) Financial time series modeling and prediction using postfix-GP. Comput Econ 47(2):219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang JJ, Wang JJ, Fang W, Niu H (2016) Financial time series prediction using elman recurrent random neural networks. Comput Intell Neurosci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4742515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jolliffe I (2002) Principal component analysis. Wiley, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Venkatesan P, Anitha S (2006) Application of a radial basis function neural network for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Curr Sci 91(9):1195Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Altun H, Gelen G (2004) Enhancing performance of MLP/RBF neural classifiers via an multivariate data distribution scheme. In: International conference on computational intelligence (ICCI2004), Nicosia, North Cyprus, vol 24, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takagi T, Sugeno M (1985) Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1:116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferreira C (2002) Gene Expression Programming in Problem Solving. In: Roy R, Köppen M, Ovaska S, Furuhashi T, Hoffmann F (eds) Soft Computing and Industry. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43(1):59MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kvochko E. (2013) Five Ways Technology Can Help the Economy. Weforum. Available at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2013/04/five-ways-technology-can-help-the-economy/. Accessed 15 Dec 2016
  26. 26.
    Harris RL, Nef J (2008) Capital, power, and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rowman & Littlefield PublishersGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    OECD iLibrary: Statistics/OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard (2011). http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/sti_scoreboard-2011-en/06/06/index.html?itemId=/content/chapter/sti_scoreboard-2011-60-en
  28. 28.
    Hoekman BM, Mavroidis PC (2015) World Trade Organization (WTO): law, economics, and politics. Routledge, AbingdonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnstone IM, Lu AY (2009) On consistency and sparsity for principal components analysis in high dimensions. J Am Stat Assoc 104(486):682.  https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.0121 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sachdeva S (2013) Foundations and trends®. Theor Comput Sci 9(2):125.  https://doi.org/10.1561/0400000065 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Serpen G, Gao Z (2014) Complexity analysis of multilayer perceptron neural network embedded into a wireless sensor network. Proc Comput Sci 36:192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Du X, Ni Y, Xie D, Yao X, Ye P, Xiao R (2015) The time complexity analysis of a class of gene expression programming. Soft Comput 19(6):1611.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1551-y CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringUrmia University of Technology (UUT)UrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations