Novel QoS optimization paradigm for IoT systems with fuzzy logic and visual information mining integration

  • Xiaoping Jiang
  • Hao DingEmail author
  • Hongling Shi
  • Chenghua Li


The Internet of Things is a new round of information technology revolution after computers, the Internet and mobile communications. Internet of Things technology is an important means to improve the level of social information, which will have a profound impact on economic development and social life. IoT can stimulate the economy, increase employment, improve efficiency and make people’s lives and work more convenient. Since fuzzy control can make good use of expert fuzzy information and effectively deal with the complex process of modeling, fuzzy control has received extensive attention once it has been proposed. Fuzzy logic system has become a research hotspot in academic and application fields due to its wide application. Fuzzy system identification includes structure identification and parameter identification. Fuzzy cognitive graph is a kind of soft computing method. It has stronger semantics than neural network because of its intuitive expression ability and powerful reasoning ability. Due to the widespread popularity of visual data acquisition devices, people can use the device to capture a large number of videos and images and spread them over the network in daily learning, production, life, work and entertainment. Computer science and technology, information computing technology, automated detection technology and Internet of Things technology contribute to the research of visual information data. In this paper, we conduct research on the novel QoS optimization paradigm for the IoT systems based on fuzzy logic and visual information mining integration. The experimental results show that the proposed optimization scheme has higher robustness.


Internet of Things Information gathering Visual information Data mining 



This study was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 61402544.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Gates B, Myhrvold N, Rinearson P (1995) The road ahead, 1st edn. Viking Penguin, New York, pp 5–16Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ITU Strategy Policy Unit (SPU) (2005) ITU International Reports 2005: the Internet of Things. International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Geneva, pp 8–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antoine de Saint-Exupery (2009) Internet of Things-Strategic Research Roadmap, pp 56–77Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mendel JM, John RI (2002) Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeng J, Liu ZQ (2006) Type-2 fuzzy hidden Markov models and their application to speech recognition. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(3):454–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li HX, Tong SC (2003) A hybrid adaptive fuzzy control for a class of nonlinear MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(1):24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen B, Liu XP, Tong SC (2007) Adaptive fuzzy output tracking control of MIMO nonlinear uncertain systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(2):287–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tong SC, Li YM (2013) Adaptive fuzzy output feedback control of MIMO nonlinear systems with unknown dead-zone inputs. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 21(1):134–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamalapurkar R, Walters P, Dixon WE (2016) Model-based reinforcement learning for approximate optimal regulation. Automatica 64:94–104MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feng B, Chen W, Sun J (2006) Chaotic time series forecasting with PSO-trained RBF neural network. In: DCABES 2006 proceedings, vol 2, pp 787–790 (ISTP)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to machine learning. MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang C, Ma Y (2012) Ensemble machine learning. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Y, Chen J, Su Z et al (2016) Robust head pose estimation using Dirichlet-tree distribution enhanced random forests. Neurocomputing 173:42–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Louppe G (2014) Understanding random forests: from theory to practice. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.7502
  15. 15.
    Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2000) Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting (with discussion and a rejoinder by the authors). Ann Stat 28(2):337–407CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang J, Hsu W, Lee M (2001) Image mining: issues, frameworks and techniques. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on multimedia data miningGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitamoto A (2002) Spatio-temporal data mining for typhoon image collection. J Intell Inf Syst 19(1):25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guadagnina R, Santanab L, Fernedaa E, Pradoa H (2010) Improving image mining through geoprocessing. J Intell Inf Syst 20(1):81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rajendran P, Madheswaran M (2010) Hybrid medical image classification using association rule mining with decision tree algorithm. J Comput 2(1):127–136Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Premchaiswadi W, Tungkatsathan A (2010) On-line content-based image retrieval system using joint querying and relevance feedback scheme. WSEAS Trans Comput 9(5):465–474Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Louis J, Dunston PS (2018) Integrating IoT into operational workflows for real-time and automated decision-making in repetitive construction operations. Autom Constr 94:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thota C, Sundarasekar R, Manogaran G, Varatharajan R, Priyan MK (2018) Centralized fog computing security platform for IoT and cloud in healthcare system. In: Krishna Prasad AV (ed) Exploring the convergence of big data and the internet of things. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pattar S, Buyya R, Venugopal KR, Iyengar SS, Patnaik LM (2018) Searching for the IoT resources: fundamentals, requirements, comprehensive review and future directions. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 20:2101–2132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guck JW, Van Bemten A, Reisslein M, Kellerer W (2018) Unicast QoS routing algorithms for SDN: a comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 20(1):388–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patel A, Kaushik P (2018) Improving QoS of VANET using adaptive CCA range and transmission range both for intelligent transportation system. Wirel Pers Commun 100(3):1063–1098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Aljawarneh SA, Yassein MB, Talafha WA (2018) A multithreaded programming approach for multimedia big data: encryption system. Multimed Tools Appl 77(9):10997–11016. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Radhakrishna V, Aljawarneh SA, Kumar PV, Choo K-KR (2018) A novel fuzzy Gaussian-based dissimilarity measure for discovering similarity temporal association patterns. Soft Comput 22(6):1903–1919. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aljawarneh SA, Vangipuram R, Puligadda VK, Vinjamuri J (2017) G-SPAMINE. Future Gener Comput Syst 74(C):430–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aljawarneh SA, Elkobaisi MR, Maatuk AM (2017) A new agent approach for recognizing research trends in wearable systems. Comput Electron Eng 61(C):275–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoping Jiang
    • 1
  • Hao Ding
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hongling Shi
    • 2
  • Chenghua Li
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hubei Key Laboratory of Intelligent Wireless CommunicationsSouth-Central University for NationalitiesWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Laboratory of Computer Science, Modeling and Optimization of SystemsUniversity of Clermont AuvergneClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations