Advertisement

A pricing method of online group-buying for continuous price function

  • Junwu ZhuEmail author
  • Ling Teng
  • Zhengnan Zhu
  • Huimin Lu
Cognitive Computing for Intelligent Application and Service
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Group-buying has become a popular commodity trading mode in current business modes. However, the existing unified price of group-buying often determines the price by setting the ladder function according to the final quantities. This method not only ignores the contributions of participants to group-buying, but also leads to the phenomenon of buyers’ false reports. In this paper, a pricing method of online group-buying based on continuous price function is proposed. We adopt an algorithm called Vickrey–Clarke–Groves for group-buying; buyers’ payments are the sum of commodities’ price and the extra amount by purchase quantity. The mechanism motivates buyers to report truthful preference through the compensatory payment. We prove that the mechanism has economic attributes such as incentive compatibility through theoretical proof and simulation experiments.

Keywords

Incentive compatibility Group-buying VCG Pricing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant 61872313, Grant 61170201, and Grant 61472344, the key research projects in education informatization in Jiangsu Province (20180012), in part by the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province under Grant KYCX18_2366 and in part by the Yangzhou Science and Technology under Grant YZ2017288 and YZ2018209 and Yangzhou University Jiangdu High-end Equipment Engineering Technology Research Institute Open Project under Grant YDJD201707.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work; there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled, “A Pricing Method of Online Group-Buying for Continuous Price Function.”

References

  1. 1.
    Matsuo T, Ito T, Shintani T (2005) A volume discount-based allocation mechanism in group buying. International workshop on data engineering issues in E-commerce. IEEE Computer Society, pp 59–70Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhu J, Song H, Jiang Y, Li B, Wang J (2017) On cloud resources consumption shifting scheme for two different geographic areas. IEEE Syst J 11(4):2708–2717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Milgrom P (2004) Putting auction theory to work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wurman PR, Wellman MP, Walsh WE (1998) The Michigan Internet AuctionBot: a configurable auction server for human and software agents, pp 301–308Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chavez A, Maes P (1996) Kasbah: an agent marketplace for buying and selling goods. In: International conference on the practical application of intelligent agents and multi-agent technology, pp 75–90Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodriguez JA, Noriega P, Sierra C et al (1997) FM96.5 a java-based electronic auction house, pp 207–224Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guttman RH, Maes P (1998) Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce. Selected papers from the 1st international workshop on agent mediated electronic trading on agent mediated electronic commerce. Springer, pp 70–90Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen J, Chen X, Kauffman RJ et al (2006) Cooperation in group-buying auctions. In: Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE Computer Society, p 121.3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee YK, Kim SY, Chung N et al (2016) When social media met commerce: a model of perceived customer value in group-buying. J Serv Mark 30(4):398–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yokoo M, Sakurai Y, Matsubara S (2000) The effect of false-name declarations in mechanism design: towards collective decision making on the internet. In: International conference on distributed computing systems, 2000. Proceedings. IEEE, pp 146–153Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamamoto J, Sycara K (2001) A stable and efficient buyer coalition formation scheme for e-marketplaces. Agents, pp 576–583Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li C, Sycara K (2002) Algorithm for combinatorial coalition formation and payoff division in an electronic marketplace. In: International joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM, pp 120–127Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang G, Shang J, Yildirim P (2016) Optimal pricing for group buying with network effects. Omega 63:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vickrey W (1961) Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J Finance 16(1):8–37MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li P, Wang D, Wang L, Huchuan L (2018) Deep visual tracking: review and experimental comparison. Pattern Recognit 76:323–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information EngineeringYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
  2. 2.Kyushu Institute of TechnologyKitakyushu-shi, FukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations