Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 213–222 | Cite as

Research on cold chain logistic service pricing—based on tripartite Stackelberg game

  • Yajuan ZhangEmail author
  • Fang Rong
  • Zhuang Wang
Brain- Inspired computing and Machine learning for Brain Health


Fresh e-commerce cannot be separated from cold chain logistics as a guarantee when supplying fresh agricultural products in different places. On the one hand, the high cost of cold chain logistics requires the cold chain logistic enterprises to price their services provided by cold chain logistic enterprises. On the other hand, it requires fresh e-commerce to reprice their products considering cold chain logistic cost. Whether the pricing strategies of both are proper affects the income of both sides, and also affects the consumers’ willingness to pay. Based on Steinberg game model and benefit equilibrium analysis, a three-stage pricing model with third-party cold chain logistic enterprise as leader, fresh e-commerce company as follower and consumer as secondary follower is established. Through the analysis of cooperative game and non-cooperative game, the optimal pricing and the best income of the cold chain logistic enterprises and the fresh e-commerce enterprises in the process of using cold chain logistics are obtained. Taking two different types of fresh products as an example, this paper simulates two kinds of fresh products based on pricing model, compares the two strategies of cooperative game and non-cooperative game, probes into the change of profit between fresh e-commerce and cold chain enterprises in different price ranges and selects pricing strategy.


Cold chain logistics Stackelberg game Three-phase pricing model Non-cooperative game Cooperative game 



The authors acknowledge the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province(Grant: G201403), the Young Talent Project of Northeast Agricultural University (Grant:14QC56), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant: 71403047). the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project (Grant: 2014M561322), Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project of Heilongjiang Province (Grant: LBH-Z14037).


  1. 1.
    Wu W, Cronjé P, Nicolai B et al (2018) Virtual cold chain method to model the postharvest temperature history and quality evolution of fresh fruit–A case study for citrus fruit packed in a single carton. Comput Electron Agric 144:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yuan X, Zou P, Zhu J et al (2015) Development trend, problems and countermeasures for cold chain logistics industry in China. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 17(01):7–14Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willersinna C, Mack G, Mouronb P, Keiser A, Siegristd M (2015) Quantity and quality of food losses along the Swiss potato supply chain: stepwise investigation and the influence of quality standards on losses. Waste Manag 46:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besik D, Nagurney A (2017) Quality in competitive fresh produce supply chains with application to farmers’ markets. Socio Econ Plan Sci 60:62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gogou E, Katsaros G, Derensb E et al (2015) Cold chain database development and application as a tool for the cold chain management and food quality evaluation. Int J Refrig 52:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brison M, LeTallec Y (2017) Transforming cold chain performance and management in lower-income countries. Vaccine 35(17):2107–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang X, LAM JSL (2018) Shipping mode choice in cold chain from a value-based management perspective. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 110:147–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yua Y, Xiao T (2017) Pricing and cold-chain service level decisions in a fresh agri-products supply chain with logistics outsourcing. Comput Ind Eng 111:56–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maiti T (2017) Two-period pricing and decision strategies in a two-echelon supply chain under price-dependent demand. Appl Math Model 42:655–674MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chung H, Lee E (2017) Asymmetric relationships with symmetric suppliers: strategic choice of supply chain price leadership in a competitive market. Eur J Oper Res 259:564–575MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tao W, Wei Z, Li B (2017) Pricing of urban food cold chain joint distribution based on non-cooperative game. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University 41(03):28–33Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jamali MB, Rasti-Barzoki M (2018) A game theoretic approach for green and non-green product pricing in chain-to-chain competitive sustainable and regular dual-channel supply chains. J Clean Prod 170(1):1029–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taleizadeh AA, Soleymanfar VR, Choi TM (2017) Optimal pricing and alliance strategy in a retailer-led supply chain with the return policy: a game-theoretic analysis. Inf Sci 420:466–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yaoqun X, Qijia Q (2018) Analysis on pork supply chain quality input based on evolutionary game. Heilongjiang Anim Sci Vet Med (6):1–5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bin G, Jing ZH (2017) The Quasi-commercial product pricing model under PPP mode: model construction and case verification. Mod Finance Econ J Tianjin Univ Finance Econ (5):26–35Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jianlin C, Meihua ZH, Honghong Zh (2012) Empirical study on influencing factors of consumers undefined willingness to adopt low-carbon innovative products: a case study of new energy vehicles. Consum Econ 28(3):23–26Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ziqiang W (2015) An empirical analysis on influencing factors of online purchase intention of fresh agricultural products. Stat Decis (20):100–103Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Economics and ManagementNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.College of ScienceNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations