Advertisement

Three-operator splitting scheme with the reference image regularization for electrical capacitance tomography

  • J. LeiEmail author
  • Q. B. Liu
  • X. Y. Wang
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The image reconstruction is an important step in the electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) technology, and its performance directly impacts the reconstruction precision (RP). Beyond existing optimization-based imaging techniques, in this study the data-dependent reference image abstracted by the regularized random vector functional link network (RVFLN) and the domain expertise about imaging targets (ITs) are simultaneously encapsulated as regularizers to form a more effective imaging model. The three-operator splitting (TOS) technique is developed to solve the proposed imaging model more effectively, which extends the flexibility of the TOS method with the improvement in the utilization of image priors. Numerical validation results indicate that the proposed imaging technique achieves better reconstructions as compared with the state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Image reconstruction Reference image regularization Regularized random vector functional link network Three-operator splitting algorithm Electrical capacitance tomography Inverse problem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2017MS012), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51206048 and 51576196) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFB0903601).

References

  1. 1.
    Tikhonov AN, Arsenin VY (1977) Solution of ill-posed problems. V.H. Winston, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu S, Fu L, Yang WQ, Wang HG, Jiang F (2004) Prior-online iteration for image reconstruction with electrical capacitance tomography. IEE Proc Sci Meas Technol 151:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landweber L (1951) An iteration formula for Fredholm integral equations of the first kind. Am J Math 73:615–624MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yan H, Wang YF, Zhou YG, Sun YH (2014) 3D ECT reconstruction by an improved Landweber iteration algorithm. Flow Meas Instrum 37:92–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang WQ, Spink DM, York TA, McCann H (1999) An image reconstruction algorithm based on Landweber’s iteration method for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol 10:1065–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang DJ, Zhang WF, Wang XY, Sun B (2016) Lamb-wave-based tomographic imaging techniques for hole-edge corrosion monitoring in plate structures. Materials 9:1–14Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong XY, Ye ZY, Soleimani M (2013) Image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography by using soft-thresholding iterative method with adaptive regulation parameter. Meas Sci Technol 24:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang HC, Fedchenia I, Shishkin SL, Finn A, Smith LL, Colket M (2015) Sparsity-inspired image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Meas Instrum 43:59–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ye JM, Wang HG, Yang WQ (2015) Image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography based on sparse representation. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64:89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosani EA, Zhang M, Abascal J, Soleimani M (2016) Imaging metallic samples using electrical capacitance tomography: forward modelling and reconstruction algorithms. Meas Sci Technol 27:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frias MAR, Yang WQ (2017) Real-time model-based image reconstruction with a prior calculated database for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol 28:1–14Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hosani EA, Soleimani M (2017) Multi-phase permittivity imaging using absolute value electrical capacitance tomography data and a level set algorithm. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 374:1–18Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia C, Su C, Cao J, Li P (2016) Reconstruction of electrical capacitance tomography images based on fast linearized alternating direction method of multipliers for two-phase flow system. Chin J Chem Eng 24:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang P, Lin JS, Wang M (2015) An image reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography based on simulated annealing particle swarm optimization. J Appl Res Technol 13:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taylor SH, Garimella SV (2015) Shape-energy evolutionary reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography in a high-aspect-ratio domain. Sens Actuators A 233:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soleimani M, Lionheart WRB (2005) Nonlinear image reconstruction for electrical capacitance tomography using experimental data. Meas Sci Technol 16:1987–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang HX, Tang L, Cao Z (2007) An image reconstruction algorithm based on total variation with adaptive mesh refinement for ECT. Flow Meas Instrum 18:262–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lei J, Liu S, Wang XY, Liu QB (2013) An image reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography based on robust principle component analysis. Sensors 13:2076–2092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lei J, Liu WY, Liu S, Wang XY (2015) Dynamic imaging method using the low n-rank tensor for electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Meas Instrum 41:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang WQ, Peng LH (2003) Image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol 14:R1–R13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Warsito W, Fan LS (2001) Neural network based multi-criterion optimization image reconstruction technique for imaging two-and three-phase flow systems using electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol 12:2198–2210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cao Z, Xu LJ, Wang HX (2010) Electrical capacitance tomography with a non-circular sensor using the dbar method. Meas Sci Technol 21:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cao Z, Xu LJ, Fan WR, Wang HX (2011) Electrical capacitance tomography for sensors of square cross sections using Calderon’s method. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60:900–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guo G, Tong GW, Lu L, Liu S (2018) Iterative reconstruction algorithm for the inverse problems in electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Meas Instrum 64:204–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tong GW, Liu S, Chen HY, Wang XY (2018) Regularization iteration imaging algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography. Meas Sci Technol 29:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldstein T, Osher S (2009) The split Bregman method for L1-regularized problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:323–343MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J (2011) Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found Trends Mach Learn 3:1–122CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang Q, Wu Z, Jin J, Wang T, Shen Y (2018) Low rank constraint and spatial spectral total variation for hyperspectral image mixed denoising. Sig Process 142:11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu Z, Wang Q, Jin J, Shen Y (2017) Structure tensor total variation-regularized weighted nuclear norm minimization for hyperspectral image mixed denoising. Sig Process 131:202–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beck A, Teboulle M (2009) A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems. SIAM J Imaging Sci 2:183–202MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Combettes PL, Wajs VR (2005) Signal recovery by proximal forward-backward splitting. Multiscale Model Simul 4:1168–1200MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hao BB, Zhu JG (2017) Fast L1 regularized iterative forward backward splitting with adaptive parameter selection for image restoration. J Vis Commun Image Represent 44:139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chambolle A, Pock T (2011) A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging. J Math Imaging Vis 40:120–145MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yu YC, Peng JG, Han XL, Cui AG (2017) A primal Douglas–Rachford splitting method for the constrained minimization problem in compressive sensing. Circuits Syst Signal Process 36:4022–4049CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li SJ, Qi HR (2015) A Douglas–Rachford splitting approach to compressed sensing image recovery using low-rank regularization. IEEE Trans Image Process 24:4240–4249MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eckstein J, Bertsekas DP (1992) On the Douglas–Rachford splitting method and the proximal point algorithm for maximal monotone operators. Math Program 55:293–318MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Strohmer T, Vershynin R (2009) A randomized Kaczmarz algorithm with exponential convergence. J Fourier Anal Appl 15:262–278MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bai ZZ, Wu WT (2008) On greedy randomized Kaczmarz method for solving large sparse linear systems. SIAM J Sci Comput 40:A592–A606MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lorenz DA, Schöpfer F, Wenger S (2014) The linearized Bregman method via split feasibility problems: analysis and generalizations. SIAM J Imaging Sci 7:1237–1262MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lorenz DA, Wenger S, Schöpfer F, Magnor M (2014) A sparse Kaczmarz solver and a linearized Bregman method for online compressed sensing. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP), pp 1347–1351Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schöpfer F, Lorenz DA (2018) Linear convergence of the randomized sparse Kaczmarz method. Math Program Ser A.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-017-1229-1 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Akbarizadeh G (2012) A new statistical-based kurtosis wavelet energy feature for texture recognition of SAR images. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 50:4358–4368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Modava M, Akbarizadeh G (2017) A level set based method for coastline detection of SAR images. In: 3rd International conference on pattern recognition and image analysis, pp 253–257Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Akbarizadeh G, Rahmani M (2017) Efficient combination of texture and color features in a new spectral clustering method for PolSAR image segmentation. Natl Acad Sci Lett 40:117–120MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Akbarizadeh G (2013) Segmentation of SAR satellite images using cellular learning automata and adaptive chains. J Remote Sensing Technol 1:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Akbarizadeh G, Rahmani M (2015) A new ensemble clustering method for PolSAR image segmentation. In: 7th Conference on information and knowledge technology, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Raeisi A, Akbarizadeh G, Mahmoudi A (2018) Combined method of an efficient cuckoo search algorithm and nonnegative matrix factorization of different zernike moment features for discrimination between oil spills and lookalikes in SAR Images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 11:4193–4205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alkareem YAZA, Venkat I, Al-Betar MA, Khader AT (2012) Edge preserving image enhancement via harmony search algorithm. In: 4th Conference on data mining and optimization, pp 47–52Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Al-Betar MA, Alyasseri ZAA, Khader AT, Bolaji AL, Awadallah MA (2016) Gray image enhancement using harmony search. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9:932–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Davis D, Yin W (2015) A three-operator splitting scheme and its optimization applications. Mathematics 19:407–412Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang YF, Zhou H, Zu SH, Mao WJ, Chen YK (2017) Three-operator proximal splitting scheme for 3-d seismic data reconstruction. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 14:1830–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Donoho DL (1995) De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 41:613–627MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Dong B, Mao Y, Osher S, Yin W (2010) Fast linearized Bregman iteration for compressive sensing and sparse denoising. Commun Math Sci 8:93–111MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pao YH, Phillips SM, Sobajic DJ (1992) Neural-net computing and the intelligent control of systems. Int J Control 56:263–289MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pao YH, Phillips SM (1995) The functional link net and learning optimal control. Neurocomputing 9:149–164CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang L, Suganthan PN (2016) A comprehensive evaluation of random vector functional link networks. Inf Sci 367:1094–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tang L, Wu Y, Yu L (2017) A non-iterative decomposition-ensemble learning paradigm using RVFL network for crude oil price forecasting. Appl Soft Comput 1–12Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cui W, Zhang L, Li B, Guo J, Meng W, Wang HX, Xie LH (2018) Received-Signal-Strength based indoor positioning using random vector functional link network. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14:1846–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ren Y, Suganthan PN, Srikanth N, Amaratung G (2016) Random vector functional link network for short-term electricity load demand forecasting. Inf Sci 367:1078–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EnergyPower and Mechanical Engineering, North China Electric Power UniversityChangping District, BeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Engineering ThermophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesHaidian District, BeijingChina
  3. 3.School of Control and Computer EngineeringNorth China Electric Power UniversityChangping District, BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations