Hybrid soft computing approach for determining water quality indicator: Euphrates River
- 149 Downloads
Recent approaches toward solving the regression problems which are characterized by dynamic and nonlinear pattern such as machine learning modeling (including artificial intelligence (AI) approaches) have proven to be useful and successful tools for prediction. Approaches that integrate predictive model with optimization algorithm such as hybrid soft computing have resulted in the enhancement of the accuracy and preciseness of models during problem predictions. In this research, the implementation of hybrid evolutionary model based on integrated support vector regression (SVR) with firefly algorithm (FFA) was investigated for water quality indicator prediction. The monthly water quality indicator (WQI) that was used to test the hybrid model over a period of 10 years belongs to the Euphrates River, Iraq. The use of the WQI as an application for this research was stimulated based on the fact that WQI is usually calculated using a manual formulation which takes much time, efforts and occasionally may be associated with errors that were not intended during the subindex calculations. The parameters considered during the formulation of the prediction model were water quality parameters as input and WQI as output. The SVR model was used to verify the accuracy of the inspected SVR–FFA model. Different statistical metrics such as best fit of goodness and absolute error measures were used to evaluate the model. The performance of the hybrid model in recognizing the dynamic and nonlinear pattern characteristics was high and remarkable compared to the pure model. The SVR–FFA model was also demonstrated to be a good and robust soft computing technique toward the prediction of WQI. The proposed model enhanced the absolute error measurements (e.g., root mean square error and mean absolute error) over the SVR-based model by 42 and 58%, respectively.
KeywordsSupport vector regression Firefly algorithm Regression problem River water quality
This work is supported by National Natural Science foundation of China (41661014), the university scientific research project of Gansu (2016A-071) and the Urban Development Institute scientific research project of Gansu (2013-GSCFY-RW30). These supports are appreciated. Also, the authors would like to express their gratitude and appreciation to the reviewers.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Here is a declaration stated by all the authors that there is no conflict of interests about publishing this article.
- 1.Fogel LJ, Owens AJ, Walsh MJ (1967) Artifical intelligence through simulated evolution, vol 1. WileyGoogle Scholar
- 18.Drucker H, Burges CJC, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V (1997) Support vector regression machines. In: Mozer MC, Jordan MI, Petsche T (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 9. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 155–161Google Scholar
- 20.Samui P, Mandla VR, Krishna A, Teja T (2011) Prediction of rainfall using support vector machine and relevance vector machine. Earth Sci India 4:188–200Google Scholar
- 38.Rounds SA (2002) Development of a neural network model for dissolved oxygen in the Tualatin River, Oregon. In: Proceedings of the second federal interagency hydrologic modeling conference, Las Vegas, NevadaGoogle Scholar
- 39.Juahir H, Zain SM, Toriman ME, Mokhtar M, Man HC (2004) Application of artificial neural network models for predicting water quality index. Malays J Civ Eng 16(2):42–55Google Scholar
- 42.Najah A, Elshafie A, Karim OA, Jaffar O (2009) Prediction of Johor River water quality parameters using artificial neural networks. Eur J Sci Res 28:422–435Google Scholar
- 45.Yunrong X, Liangzhong J (2009) Water quality prediction using LS-SVM with particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the WKDD 2009 second international workshop on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 900–904Google Scholar
- 46.Xuan W, Jiake L, Deti X (2010) A hybrid approach of support vector machine with particle swarm optimization for water quality prediction. In: 2010 5th International conference on computer science and education, pp 1158–1163. doi: 10.1109/ICCSE.2010.5593697
- 53.Liu D, Chen Q (2013) Prediction of building lighting energy consumption based on support vector regression. In: 2013 9th Asian control conference ASCC 2013. doi: 10.1109/ASCC.2013.6606376
- 65.Mohammadi S, Mozafari B, Solimani S, Niknam T (2013) An adaptive modified firefly optimisation algorithm based on hong’s point estimate method to optimal operation management in a microgrid with consideration of uncertainties. Energy 51:339–348. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 76.Abbood DW, Gubashi KR, Abbood HH (2014) Evaluation of water quality index in the main Drain River in Iraq by application of CCME water quality. Civ Environ Res 6:19–24Google Scholar
- 77.Olszewski T, Ryniecki A, Boniecki P (2008) Neural network development for automatic identification of the endpoint of drying barley in bulk. J Res Appl Agric Eng 53(1) 26–31Google Scholar