Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 199–205 | Cite as

On stratified variable thermal conductivity stretched flow of Walter-B material subject to non-Fourier flux theory

  • T. Hayat
  • M. Zubair
  • M. WaqasEmail author
  • A. Alsaedi
  • M. Ayub
Original Article


The objective here is to examine the characteristics of non-Fourier flux theory in flow induced by a nonlinear stretched surface. Constitutive expression for an incompressible Walter-B liquid is taken into account. Consideration of thermal stratification and variable thermal conductivity characterizes the heat transfer process. The concept of boundary layer is adopted for the formulation purpose. Modern methodology for the computational process is implemented. Surface drag force is computed and discussed. Salient features of significant variables on the physical quantities are reported graphically. It is explored that velocity is enhanced for a larger ratio of rate constants. The increasing values of thermal relaxation factor correspond to less temperature.


Thermal stratification Walter-B material Non-Fourier flux theory Stagnation point flow Variable thermal conductivity 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Ozisik MN (1993) Heat conduction (third ed.). John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garrido PL, Hurtado PI, Nadrowski B (2001) Simple one-dimensional model of heat conduction which obeys Fourier’s law. Phys Rev Lett 86:5486–5489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kabir MM (2011) Analytic solutions for generalized forms of the nonlinear heat conduction equation. Nonlinear Anal RWA 12:2681–2691MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guo SL, Wang BL (2015) Thermal shock fracture of a cylinder with a penny-shaped crack based on hyperbolic heat conduction. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christov CI, Jordan PM (2005) Heat conduction paradox involving second-sound propagation in moving media. Phys Rev Lett 94:154301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qi HT, Guo XW (2014) Transient fractional heat conduction with generalized Cattaneo model. Int J Heat Mass Transf 76:535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ying XH, Tao QH, Yun JX (2013) Fractional Cattaneo heat equation in a semi-infinite medium. Chin Phys B 22:014401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao X, Sun ZZ (2015) Compact Crank-Nicolson schemes for a class of fractional Cattaneo equation in inhomogeneous medium. J Sci Comput 62:747–771MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Qi HT, Jiang XY (2011) Solutions of the space-time fractional Cattaneo diffusion equation. Phys A 390:1876–1883MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cattaneo C (1948) Sulla conduzione del calore, Atti semin. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena Reggio Emilia 3:83–101Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu L, Zheng L, Zhang X (2016) Fractional anomalous diffusion with Cattaneo--Christov flux effects in a comb-like structure. Appl Math Model 40:6663–6675MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Christov CI (2009) On frame indifferent formulation of the Maxwell-Cattaneo model of finite-speed heat conduction. Mech Res Commun 36:481–486MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nadeem S, Muhammad N (2016) Impact of stratification and Cattaneo-Christov heat flux in the flow saturated with porous medium. J Mol Liq 224:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Waqas M, Hayat T, Farooq M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A (2016) Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model for flow of variable thermal conductivity generalized Burgers fluid. J Mol Liq 220:642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khan WA, Khan M, Alshomrani AS (2016) Impact of chemical processes on 3D Burgers fluid utilizing Cattaneo-Christov double-diffusion: applications of non-Fourier’s heat and non-Fick’s mass flux models. J Mol Liq 223:1039–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hayat T, Zubair M, Ayub M, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2016) Stagnation point flow towards nonlinear stretching surface with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux. Eur Phys J Plus 131:355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu L, Zheng L, Liu F, Zhang X (2016) Anomalous convection diffusion and wave coupling transport of cells on comb frame with fractional Cattaneo-Christov. Comm Non Sci Numer Simul 38:45–58MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Farooq M, Alsaedi A, Waqas M, Yasmeen T (2016) Impact of Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model in flow of variable thermal conductivity fluid over a variable thicked surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 99:702–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tanveer A, Hina S, Hayat T, Mustafa M, Ahmad B (2016) Effects of the Cattaneo-Christov heat flux model on peristalsis. Eng Applications Comput Fluid Mech 10:375–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hayat T, Waqas M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A (2016) On 2D stratified flow of an Oldroyd-B fluid with chemical reaction: an application of non-Fourier heat flux theory. J Mol Liq 223:566–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sui J, Zheng L, Zhang X (2016) Boundary layer heat and mass transfer with Cattaneo-Christov double-diffusion in upper-convected Maxwell nanofluid past a stretching sheet with slip velocity. Int J Thermal Sci 104:461–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan WA, Khan M, Alshomrani AS, Ahmad L (2016) Numerical investigation of generalized Fourier’s and Fick’s laws for Sisko fluid flow. J Mol Liq 224:1016–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ali ME, Sandeep N (2017) Cattaneo-Christov model for radiative heat transfer of magnetohydrodynamic Casson-ferrofluid: a numerical study. Results Phys 7:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2017) On Cattaneo--Christov heat flux in the flow of variable thermal conductivity Eyring--Powell fluid. Results Phys DOI. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.12.034 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar KA, Reddy JVR, Sugunamma V, Sandeep N (2016) Magnetohydrodynamic Cattaneo-Christov flow past a cone and a wedge with variable heat source/sink. Alex Eng J DOI. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.11.013 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crane LJ (1970) Flow past a stretching plate. J Appl Math Phys (ZAMP) 21:645–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shufrin I, Eisenberger M (2005) Stability of variable thickness shear deformable plates-first order and high order analyses. Thin-Walled Struct 43:189–207CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Subhashini SV, Sumathi R, Pop I (2013) Dual solutions in a thermal diffusive flow over a stretching sheet with variable thickness. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 48:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayat T, Hussain Z, Muhammad T, Alsaedi A (2016) Effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous reactions in flow of nanofluids over a nonlinear stretching surface with variable surface thickness. J Mol Liq 221:1121–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hayat T, Bashir G, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2016) MHD 2D flow of Williamson nanofluid over a nonlinear variable thicked surface with melting heat transfer. J Mol Liq 223:836–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2017) Mathematical modeling of non-Newtonian fluid with chemical aspects: a new formulation and results by numerical technique. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochemical Eng Aspects DOI. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.01.007 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hayat T, Zubair M, Ayub M, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2017) On doubly stratified chemically reactive flow of Powell-Eyring liquid subject to non-Fourier heat flux theory. Results Phys 7:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Opanasenko AN, Sorokin AP, Zaryugin DG, Rachkov MV (2012) Coolant stratification in nuclear power facilities. Atomic Energy 111:172–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parthasarathy U, Sundararajan T, Balaji C, Velusamy K, Chellapandi P, Chetal SC (2012) Decay heat removal in pool type fast reactor using passive systems. Nuc Eng Des 250:480–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lu T, Han WW, Zhai H (2015) Numerical simulation of temperature fluctuation reduction by a vortex breaker in an elbow pipe with thermal stratification. Annals Nuc Energy 75:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kumar S, Vijayan PK, Kannan U, Sharma M, Pilkhwal DS (2017) Experimental and computational simulation of thermal stratification in large pools with immersed condenser. Appl Thermal Eng 113:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Farooq M, Alsaedi A, Khan MI (2017) Thermally stratified stretching flow with Cattaneo-Christov heat flux. Int J Heat Mass Transf 106:289–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chiam CT (1966) Heat transfer with variable conductivity in stagnation-point flow towards a stretching sheet. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 23:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Akbar NS, Raza M, Ellahi R (2016) Endoscopic effects with entropy generation analysis in peristalsis for the thermal conductivity of H2O+Cu nanofluid. J Appl Fluid Mech 9:1721–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Akbar NS, Raza M, Ellahi R (2015) Peristaltic flow with thermal conductivity of H2O+Cu nanofluid and entropy generation. Results Phys 5:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Akbar NS, Raza M, Ellahi R (2016) Anti-bacterial applications for new thermal conductivity model in arteries with CNT suspended nanofluid. Int J Mech Medicine Biology 16:1650063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hayat T, Khan MI, Waqas M, Yasmeen T, Alsaedi A (2016) Viscous dissipation effect in flow of magnetonanofluid with variable properties. J Mol Liq 222:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liao SJ (2012) Homotopic analysis method in nonlinear differential equations. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ellahi R, Hassan M, Zeeshan A (2016) Aggregation effects on water base Al2O3-nanofluid over permeable wedge in mixed convection. Asia-Pacific J Chemical Eng 11:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hayat T, Waqas M, Shehzad SA, Alsaedi A (2016) A model of solar radiation and Joule heating in magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) convective flow of thixotropic nanofluid. J Mol Liq 215:704–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Turkyilmazoglu M (2016) An effective approach for evaluation of the optimal convergence control parameter in the homotopy analysis method. Filomat 30:1633–1650MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hayat T, Waqas M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A (2016) Analysis of thixotropic nanomaterial in a doubly stratified medium considering magnetic field effects. Int J Heat Mass Transf 102:1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shehzad SA, Hayat T, Alsaedi A, Chen B (2016) A useful model for solar radiation. Energy, Ecology Environment 1:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waqas M, Farooq M, Khan MI, Alsaedi A, Hayat T, Yasmeen T (2016) Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) mixed convection flow of micropolar liquid due to nonlinear stretched sheet with convective condition. Int J Heat Mass Transf 102:766–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hayat T, Qayyum S, Waqas M, Alsaedi A (2016) Thermally radiative stagnation point flow of Maxwell nanofluid due to unsteady convectively heated stretched surface. J Mol Liq 224:801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Mahapatra TR, Gupta AS (2002) Heat transfer in stagnation-point flow towards a stretching sheet. Heat Mass Transf 38:517–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Hayat
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Zubair
    • 1
  • M. Waqas
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Alsaedi
    • 2
  • M. Ayub
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MathematicsQuaid-I-Azam UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Nonlinear Analysis and Applied Mathematics (NAAM) Research Group, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations