Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 139–156 | Cite as

Failure prognostics of heavy vehicle hydro-pneumatic spring based on novel degradation feature and support vector regression

  • Cheng Yang
  • Ping SongEmail author
  • Xiongjun Liu
Original Article
  • 206 Downloads

Abstract

The hydro-pneumatic spring, as an important element of the suspension system for heavy vehicles, has attracted the attention of researchers for a long time because it plays such an important role in the steering stability, driving comfort, and driving safety of these vehicles. In this paper, we aim to solve the maintenance problems caused by gas leakage and oil leakage faults in hydro-pneumatic springs. The causes of hydro-pneumatic spring faults and their modes are investigated first. Then, we propose a novel time domain fault feature, called degraded pressure under the same displacement, and a novel feature extraction method based on linear interpolation and redefined time intervals. This feature extraction method is then combined with a data-driven prognostic method that is based on support vector regression to predict the failure trends. When compared with traditional prognostic methods for suspension systems based on vibration signals and vehicle dynamics models, the proposed method can evaluate the real-time spring condition without use of additional sensors or an accurate dynamic model. Therefore, the computational cost of the proposed method is very low and is also suitable for use in vehicles that are equipped with low-cost microprocessors. In addition, hydro-pneumatic spring performance degradation experiments and simulations based on AMEsim software are designed. The experimental data, real vehicle historical data, and simulation data are used to verify the feasibility of the proposed method.

Keywords

Heavy vehicle Hydro-pneumatic spring Feature extraction Support vector regression Fault prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Basic Scientific Research Program of China (Grant No. A0920132012). We would like to thank both the editors and the reviewers for providing helpful comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Vichare NM, Pecht MG (2006) Prognostics and health management of electronics [J]. IEEE Transactions on Components & Packaging Technologies 29(1):222–229Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W et al (2014) Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—reviews, methodology and applications [J]. Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing 42(1–2):314–334Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsui KL, Chen N, Zhou Q et al (2015) Prognostics and health management: a review on data driven approaches [J]. Math Probl Eng 2015(6):1–17Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    David Ludovici, Michael Bray, Vish Wickramanayake (2013) Health and usage monitoring proof of concept study using army land vehicles [C]. 15th Australian International Aerospace CongressGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sankavaram C, Kodali A, Pattipati K (2013) An integrated health management process for automotive cyber-physical systems[C]. IEEE ICNC 2013 International Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems :82–86Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ompusunggu A, Papy JM, Vandenplas S (2016) Kalman-filtering-based prognostics for automatic transmission clutches [J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 21(1):419–430Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ompusunggu A P, Vandenplas S, Sas P et al. (2012) Health Assessment and Prognostics of Automotive Clutches[C]// European Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management SocietyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu M, Wang D (2014) Model-based health monitoring for a vehicle steering system with multiple faults of unknown types [J]. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 61(61):3574–3586Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banks J, Brought M, Estep J et al. (2011) Health and usage monitoring for military ground vehicle power generating devices[C]. IEEE Aerospace Conference. IEEE Computer Society :1–17Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamed M, Tesfa B, Gu F et al. (2014) A study of the suspension system for the diagnosis of dynamic characteristics[C]. Automation and Computing (ICAC), 2014 20th International Conference on, Cranfield 152–157Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Solomon U, Padmanabhan C (2011) Hydro-gas suspension system for a tracked vehicle: modeling and analysis[J]. J Terrramech 48(2):125–137Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bartnicki A, Muszyński T, Rubiec A (2015) Hydropneumatic suspension efficiency in terms of Teleoperated UGV research[J]. Solid State Phenom 237(1):195–200Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferreira C, Ventura P, Morais R et al (2009) Sensing methodologies to determine automotive damper condition under vehicle normal operation[J]. Sensors & Actuators A Physical 156(1):237–244Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernandezalcantara D, Moralesmenendez R, Amezquitabrooks L (2015) Fault Detection for Automotive Shock Absorber[C]// Journal of Physics: Conference Series :012037Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Luo J, Pattipati KR, Qiao L et al (2008) Model-based prognostic techniques applied to a suspension system [J]. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst Hum 38(5):1156–1168Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wei X, Jia L, Liu H (2013) A comparative study on fault detection methods of rail vehicle suspension systems based on acceleration measurements [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics & Mobility 51(5):700–720Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao F, Guan JF, Gu L et al. (2016) Experimental study on wheeled vehicle hydro-pneumatic suspension fault detection [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (2)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jaoude AA (2014) Analytic and linear prognostic model for a vehicle suspension system subject to fatigue [J]. Systems Science & Control Engineering 3(1):81–98Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Guo J, Jiao N, Jiang L et al. (2014) Hydro-pneumatic suspension gasbag reliability improvement based on FMEA and FTA[C]. International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety. IEEE 592–594Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drucker H, Burges CJC, Kaufman L et al (1996) Support vector regression machines. [J]. Adv Neural Inf Proces Syst 28(7):779–784Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Loutas TH, Roulias D, Georgoulas G (2013) Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic E-support vectors regression[J]. IEEE Trans Reliab 62(4):821–832Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang S, Zhao L, Su X et al. (2014) Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on flexible support vector regression[C]. Prognostics and System Health Management Conference. IEEE 317–322.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Benkedjouh T, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N et al (2015) Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression [J]. J Intell Manuf 26(2):213–223Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen S, Xin P, Tao L (2014) A method for predicting life of electronic components based on generic algorithm and support vector machine (SVM) [J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University 32(4):637–641Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lyu W-L, Chang C-C (2016) An image compression method based on block truncation coding and linear regression [J]. Journal of Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing 7(1):198–215Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W et al (2014) Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—reviews, methodology and applications [J]. Mech Syst Signal Process 42:314–334Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duan WY, Huang LM, Han Y et al (2015) A hybrid AR-EMD-SVR model for the short-term prediction of nonlinear and non-stationary ship motion [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science A 16(7):562–576Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang JE, Qiao JZ (2013) Parameter selection of SVR based on improved K-fold cross validation[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials 462-463:182–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Biomimetic Robots and SystemsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations