Effects of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic—preliminary results
Initial investigation of the impact of a Cancer Survivorship Clinic following its introduction in February 2017.
A systematic chart review of 176 patients enrolled in the Cancer Survivorship Clinic (CSC) who completed a minimum of one follow-up visit after the initial baseline visit. This was assessed using three screening tools: distress thermometer (DT), Canadian Problem Checklist (CPC), and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Descriptive statistics and t tests were utilized to assess the impact of the CSC.
Distress thermometer: Statistically significant decline in scores from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit among the study population (p < 0.05). There was a significant decline in score among high-risk patients with an initial DT≥4 (p < 0.0001). Canadian Problem Checklist: Based on the initial baseline visit, the top five reported causes of distress among the study population include pain, anxiety, fatigue, tingling in hands and feet, sleep. Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale: Statistically significant decline in reported pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and shortness of breath scores (p < 0.05).
Overall, patients had a significant reduction in distress from the baseline visit to the follow-up visit. High-risk patients experienced a more significant reduction in distress. Reduction in patient distress was independent of the number of visits to the clinic. Reported symptom severity for pain, tiredness, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, and shortness of breath also declined significantly following clinic intervention. Further qualitative studies required to establish the clinical significance of study findings.
Implications for cancer survivors
Continued active clinical support and education for cancer survivors should be considered a potentially essential element in the cancer treatment trajectory to address patient well-being and distress.
KeywordsCancer Survivorship Primary care Distress Clinical practice guidelines Knowledge translation
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study received approval through the William Osler Health System Research Ethics Board. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This is a systematic review that does not involve any contact with human participants. No informed consent is needed.
- 1.Ganz PA (2011) The “three Ps” of cancer survivorship care. BMC Med 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-14
- 4.Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 7.National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (2010) Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: distress management. Fort Washington, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- 9.Holland JC, Anderson B, Breitbart WS et al (2010) Distress management. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 5:66–98Google Scholar
- 14.Cancer Journey Action Group (2009) Guide to implementing screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: moving towards person-centred care (part a). Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- 15.Howell D, Keller-Olaman S, Oliver TK, Hack TF, Broadfield L, Biggs K, Chung J, Gravelle D, Green E, Hamel M, Harth T, Johnston P, McLeod D, Swinton N, Syme A, Olson K (2013) A pan-Canadian practice guideline and algorithm: screening, assessment, and supportive care of adults with cancer-related fatigue. Curr Oncol 20:233–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cancer Care Ontario (2004) Telephone nursing practice and symptom management guidelines. Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cancer Care Ontario (2005) Palliative care collaborative care plan: fatigue (cancer patients). Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
- 22.Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK et al (2011) Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline. Curr Oncol 18:e265–e281Google Scholar
- 23.Fitch MI (2000) Supportive care for cancer patients. Hosp Q 3:39–46Google Scholar
- 24.About Wellspring. Wellspring. https://wellspring.ca/the-wellspring-approach/. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
- 32.Howell D, Olsen K (2011) Distress – the 6th vital sign. Curr Oncol 18:208–210Google Scholar
- 34.Cancer Journey Portfolio (2012) Screening for distress, the 6th vital sign: a guide to implementing best practices in person-centred care. Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar