Advertisement

Chemotherapy intravenously in children with cancer at home, the nurse practitioner makes it possible!

  • N. T. M. KokEmail author
  • A. C. Ligthart-Beukhof
  • M. D. van de Wetering
Commentary
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Currently the entire treatment of a child with cancer is carried out in a specialized hospital. It would be ideal to conduct part of the treatment at home. This can only be done with adequately trained personnel. In the Netherlands, specialized pediatric oncology home care nurse practitioners have been trained to deliver this kind of care. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to administer intravenous chemotherapy at home.

Purpose

This study aimed to safely administer chemotherapy intravenously (iv) at home by specialized nurse practitioners and aimed to increase the quality of life (QOL) of the child and decrease the social burden in families with a child with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Method

The pilot study was performed by well-trained home care nurse practitioners. Low-dose methotrexate iv and low-dose cytarabine iv were administered to 11 included children with ALL in their home environment.

Results

QOL increased whereas social burden decreased for patients and parents. Chemotherapy administration in the home environment was safe with the help of well-trained nurse practitioners.

Conclusion

It is feasible to administer intravenous chemotherapy at home in a safe and efficient way. The role of the specialized pediatric oncology nurse practitioner is an essential one.

Keywords

Children Cancer Homecare Chemotherapy Nurse practitioner 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mediq Tefa, Emma kinderziekenhuis of the University Medical Center Amsterdam, and Kinderthuiszorg for making this pilot possible, and Prof. Dr. Mr. A.E.E.Verhagen of the University Medical Center Groningen for critically reviewing this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving the participants (e.g., children and their parents) were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fortier MA, Batista ML, Wahi A, Kain A, Strom S, Sender LS (2013) Illness uncertainty and quality of life in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 35(5):366–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Queiroz D, Amorim M, Zandonade E, Miotto M (2015) Quality of life of children and adolescents with cancer: revision of studies literature that used the pediatric quality of life inventory. Investig Educ Enferm 33(2):343–354Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, Blumenthal R (1993) Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull 29:321–326Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burckhardt C, Anderson K (2003) The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity and utilization- BioMedCentral, 31-10-2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vidhubala E, Latha, Kannan R, Mani C, Karthikesh K, Muthuvel R, Surendran V, Premkumari R (2005) Validation of quality of life questionnaire for patients with cancer - Indian scenario. Indian J Cancer 42(3):138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calaminus G, Weinspach S, Teske C, Göbel U (2000) Quality of life in children and adolescents with cancer. First results of an evaluation of 49 patients with the PEDQOL questionnaire. Klin Padiatr 212(4):211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stevens B, Croxford R, McKeever P, Yamada J, Booth M, Daub S, Gafni A, Gammon J, Greenberg M (2006) Hospital and home chemotherapy for children with leukemia: a randomized cross-over study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47:285–292 Oral Outpatient ChemotherapyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips B, Richards M, Boys R, Hodgkin M, Kinsey S (2011) A home-based maintenance therapy program for acute lymphoblastic leukemia—practical and safe? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33:433–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor J, Winter L, Geyer L, Hawkins D (2006) “Medication errors in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia” American Cancer SocietyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly K, Wells D, Chen L, Reeves E, Mass E, Camitta B, Hinds P (2014) Caregiving demands and well-being in parents of children treated with outpatient or inpatient methotrexate infusion: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 36:495–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duderstadt K Medical home: nurse practitioners’ role in health care delivery to vulnerable populations- PlumX MetricsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chicoine V, Aselton P (2015) Nurse practitioner role in home healthcare: challenges and opportunities- December 17, 2014 Clinical Nursing Studies, Vol. 3, NoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University Medical Center GroningenGroningenNetherlands
  2. 2.Prinses Maxima CenterUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations