Question prompts to empower cancer patients: results of a randomized controlled trial
In addition to question prompts for information transfer, we also used prompts to facilitate the expression of emotions. Our aim was to investigate how a question prompt list (QPL) is accepted by patients and whether it enhances interactional empowerment of the patients in the consultation with the radio-oncological treatment team before the beginning of radiotherapy.
Adult cancer patients before the beginning of radiotherapy were randomly assigned to the intervention group (IG) or control group (CG). The patients in the IG received a QPL with predefined subsets and subject areas. After the physician’s consultation, both groups completed a self-developed, content validated questionnaire on interactional empowerment. The IG evaluated the QPL using a self-developed instrument.
A total of 279 adult cancer patients participated in the study (IG n = 139/CG n = 140). The participants of the IG reported a significantly higher interactional empowerment compared with those of the CG (t(277) = − 2.71, p = .007, 95% CI [− 1.61, − 0.26], d = 0.29). 60.4% of the IG agreed “rather” or “very” that they used the QPL in consultation with the medical team.
The QPL used in the consultation improved the self-assessed competence for interaction with the medical team and strengthened the interactional empowerment. The QPL was well accepted by the patients and is to be introduced into a routine as a practicable and simple instrument in the future. The support of patients in addressing concerns and fears is an important innovation.
KeywordsQuestion prompt lists Empowerment Oncology Information needs
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
Zetzl, Mann, and Gruner report grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe, during conduct of the study. Schuler, Jentschke, Neuderth, Roch, and Oorschot have nothing to disclose.
The design, conduct, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results were performed independently of the funders. The funders played no role in the review or approval of this manuscript.
- 2.Guidolin K, Lock M, Brackstone M (2017) Patient-perceived barriers to radiation therapy for breast cancer. Can J Surg 61(1):15716Google Scholar
- 6.Kinnersley P, Edwards A, Hood K et al (2008) Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. BMJ 3Google Scholar
- 9.Fröjd C, Lampic C, Larsson G, Essen L (2009) Is satisfaction with doctors’ care related to health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among patients with carcinoid tumours? A longitudinal report. Scand J Caring Sci 23(1):107–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00596.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bensing J, Verhaak PFM (eds) (2004) Chapter 11: communication in medical encounters. Health Psychology. Blackwell Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 26.Langewitz W, Keller A, Denz M et al (1995) The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Psychother Med Psych 45(9–10):351–357Google Scholar
- 38.Ahamad A, Wallner P, Salenius S et al (2019) Information needs expressed during patient-oriented oncology consultations. J Canc Educ 34(3):488–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1329-5
- 39.Sansoni JE, Grootemaat P, Duncan C (2015) Question. Prompt Lists Health Consult 98(12):1454–1464Google Scholar