Psychological aspects, risk and protective factors related to BRCA genetic testing: a review of the literature
The primary aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review of short-, intermediate- and long-term psychological effects, such as anxiety, depression and distress, on individuals undergoing genetic testing to determine BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation. The different instruments used for the measurement of each construct were reported. In addition, risk and protective factors associated with psychological outcomes of genetic tests were explored.
Bibliographic databases were searched for studies published over the period 1998–2018. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method, 21 articles were selected for the current review.
Overall, the collected data revealed rather diverse results, although most studies reported higher levels of distress, anxiety and depression in carriers, as compared to non-carriers. The two genders were not equally represented, with men constituting only 6% of the sample. Risk factors and protective factors that may influence psychological outcomes and adjustment to genetic tests are highlighted and discussed in this review.
The increased risk of developing cancer associated with positive genetic testing results may be experienced as traumatic by many patients, although not all individuals with positive genetic testing results will experience increased distress. Hence, future studies should consider specific risk factors in order to select those who are more likely to be in need of psychological support. Finally, it is necessary to increase the number of male samples to better understand the male experience related to genetic testing outcomes.
KeywordsBRCA1/2 mutation Genetic counselling Cancer risk Psychological distress Anxiety Depression Review
The authors did not receive any funding for any of the steps taken to write this review.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.NCCN. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2014) Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_screening.pdf
- 8.Sommaggio P (2010) La consulenza genetica: un ponte tra autopoiesi ed auto trascendimento [genetic counseling: a bridge between autopoiesis and self-transcendence]. Tigor 2:155–180Google Scholar
- 12.Kinney AY, Bloor LE, Mandal D, Simonsen SE, Baty BJ, Holubkov R, Seggar K, Neuhausen S, Smith K (2005) The impact of receiving genetic test results on general and cancer-specific psychologic distress among members of an African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. Cancer 104(11):2508–2516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bonadona V, Saltel P, Desseigne F, Mignotte H, Saurin JC, Wang Q, Sinilnikova O, Giraud S, Freyer G, Plauchu H, Puisieux A, Lasset C (2002) Cancer patients who experienced diagnostic genetic testing for cancer susceptibility reactions and behavior after the disclosure of a positive test result. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 11(1):97–104Google Scholar
- 19.Lodder L, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, Tibben A, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Duivenvoorden HJ, Wagner A, van Der Meer CA, Devilee P, Cornelisse CJ, Niermeijer MF (2001) Men at risk of being a mutation carrier for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer: an exploration of attitudes and psychological functioning during genetic testing. Eur J Hum Genet 9(7):492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Smith KR, West JA, Croyle RT, Botkin JR (1999) Familial context of genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: moderating effect of siblings’ test results on psychological distress one to two weeks after BRCA1 mutation testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 8(4):385–392Google Scholar
- 37.Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, Meijers-Heijboer EJ, Klijn JGM, Duivenvoorden HJ, Tibben A, Wagner A, van der Meer CA, Devilee P, Cornelisse CJ, Niermeijer MF (1999) Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? J Med Genet 36:906–913Google Scholar
- 39.Beck AT, Steer RA (1993) Beck depression inventory manual. Psychol Corp, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
- 40.Spielberger C, Gorsuch F, Lushene R (1971) STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
- 41.Babore A, Bramanti SM, Lombardi L, Stuppia L, Trumello C, Antonucci I, Cavallo A (2019) The role of depression and emotion regulation on parenting stress in a sample of mothers with cancer. Support Care Cancer 27:1271–1277Google Scholar
- 45.Fine BA (1999) Psychological impact of mutation testing. In: Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Ovarian Cancer: Assessment, Counseling and Testing Guidelines. American College of Medical Genetics, Bethesda (MD)Google Scholar