Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 3785–3792 | Cite as

A cross-sectional population-based survey looking at the impact of cancer survivorship care plans on meeting the needs of cancer survivors in the posttreatment stage

  • Soleil ChahineEmail author
  • Robin Urquhart
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of receiving a survivorship care plan (SCP) on meeting cancer survivors’ overall, informational, physical, emotional, and practical needs. Since the recommendation for implementation of SCPs, there have been numerous studies on their effectiveness with mostly inconclusive results.

Methods

All Nova Scotia survivors meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified from the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry and sent the 83-item survey to assess experiences and needs across five domains (overall, informational, physical, emotional, and practical). Descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages) and chi-square analyses were used to examine and report survey findings.

Results

The response rate was 44.6%, with 1514 respondents. SCPs were significantly associated (p < 0.00001) with receiving timely help and support to meet survivors’ overall, informational, physical, emotional, and practical needs posttreatment. For the most part, survivors’ clinical characteristics, such as cancer type, time since treatment, chronic comorbidities, and metastases, did not result in differences among the five outcomes.

Conclusions

Those who received a SCP reported higher agreement on all five outcomes in comparison to those who did not receive a SCP. Further work should evaluate the delivery of SCPs and the components of SCPs that are most likely to contribute to positive survivor outcomes.

Keywords

Survivorship Survivorship care plan Needs Survey Cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Research In Medicine studentship funding from Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine Gladys Osman Estate. The authors would also like to acknowledge Gordon Walsh from the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry for his assistance in this project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Kramer JL, Rowland JH et al (2016) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. Am J Clin Oncol 66(4):271–289Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics (2017) Canadian Cancer Statistics. Can Cancer Soc 2017:1–132Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller KD, Pandey M, Jain R, Mehta R (2015) Cancer survivorship and models of survivorship care: a review. Am J Clin Oncol 38(6):627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E, Policy NC. (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in translation. Committee on cancer survivorship: improving quality care and quality of life, national cancer policy board; Washington, DC: National Academies Press. 150–156Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van De Poll-franse LV, Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM, Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM (2017) The impact of cancer survivorship care plans on patient and health care provider outcomes: a current perspective. Acta Oncol (Madr) 56(2):134–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lagrandeur W, Armin J, Howe CL, Ali-akbarian L (2018) Survivorship care plan outcomes for primary care physicians, cancer survivors, and systems: a scoping review. J Cancer Surviv 12:334–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobsen PB, Derosa AP, Henderson TO, Mayer DK, Moskowitz CS, Electra D et al (2018) Systematic review of the impact of cancer survivorship care plans on health outcomes and health care delivery. J Clin Oncol 36(20):2088–2100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klemanski DL, Browning KK, Kue J (2016) Survivorship care plan preferences of cancer survivors and health care providers: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv 10(1):71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nicolaije KAH, Ezendam NPM, Vos MC, Pijnenborg JMA, Boll D, Boss EA, Hermans RHM, Engelhart KCM, Haartsen JE, Pijlman BM, van Loon-Baelemans IEAM, Mertens HJMM, Nolting WE, van Beek JJ, Roukema JA, Zijlstra WP, Kruitwagen RFPM, van de Poll-Franse LV (2015) Impact of an automatically generated cancer survivorship care plan on patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: longitudinal outcomes of a pragmatic, cluster randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 33(31):3550–3559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kvale EA, Huang CHS, Meneses KM, Demark-Wahnefried W, Bae S, Azuero CB, Rocque GB, Bevis KS, Ritchie CS (2016) Patient-centered support in the survivorship care transition: outcomes from the patient-owned survivorship care plan intervention. Cancer 122(20):3232–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keesing S, Mcnamara B, Rosenwax L (2015) Cancer survivors’ experiences of using survivorship care plans: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv 9:260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Birken SA, Urquhart R, Munoz-Plaza C, Zizzi AR, Haines E, Stover A, Mayer DK, Hahn EE (2018) Survivorship care plans: are randomized controlled trials assessing outcomes that are relevant to stakeholders? J Cancer Surviv 12(4):495–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beckjord EB, Reynolds KA, van Londen G, Burns R, Singh R, Arvey SR et al (2014) Population-level trends in posttreatment cancer survivors’ concerns and associated receipt of care: results from the 2006 and 2010 LIVESTRONG surveys. J Psychosoc Oncol 32(2):125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodgkinson K, Butow P, Hunt G, Pendelbury S, Hobbs K, Lo S et al (2007) The development and evaluation of a measure to assess cancer survivors’ unmet supportive care needs: the CaSUN (cancer survivors’ unmet needs measure). Psychooncology 16:796–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boekhout AH, Maunsell E, Pond GR, Julian JA, Coyle D, Levine MN et al (2015) A survivorship care plan for breast cancer survivors: extended results of a randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv 9(4):683–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maly RC, Liang L-J, Liu Y, Griggs JJ, Ganz PA (2017) Randomized controlled trial of survivorship care plans among low-income, predominantly Latina breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol 35(16):1814–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith K, Tolbert E, Hannum S, Radhakrishnan A, Zorn K, Blackford A et al (2016) Comparing web-based provider-initiated and patient-initiated survivorship care planning for cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Cancer 2(2):e12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore A, Carlson A, Kornhauser N, Schneider SE, Andreopoulou E, Cigler T, Vahdat LT, Webster G, Guthrie W (2018) Breast cancer survivorship care plan: patient satisfaction with a web-based application. J Clin Oncol 36(7):50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Birken SA, Raskin S, Zhang Y, Lane G, Zizzi A, Pratt-Chapman M. (2018) Survivorship care plan implementation in US cancer programs: a national survey of cancer care providers. J Cancer EducGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Nova Scotia Health AuthorityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations