Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 10, pp 3805–3811 | Cite as

Combined decongestive therapy and reduction of pain and heaviness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema

  • Zahra Sheikhi Mobarakeh
  • Parisa Mokhtari-Hesari
  • Masomeh Lotfi-TokaldanyEmail author
  • Ali Montazeri
  • Mahnaz Heidari
  • Fatemeh Zekri
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

We aimed to determine the effectiveness of combined decongestive therapy (CDT) and the minimum sessions required to significantly reduce pain and heaviness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Methods

A sample of 169 patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema underwent CDT, 5 days/week for a total of 3 to 4 weeks. Self-reported pain and heaviness was quantified on a separate visual analog scale (VAS) prior to CDT and after 3, 5, 7, 10, and 15 sessions. Scores derived from VASs were categorized into three categories: mild (score < 4), moderate (score = 4–6), and severe (score > 6). Downward transition for at least one category in severity of each parameter was considered as an improvement. Repeated measure analysis of variance was conducted to test the effect of time on the severities of pain and heaviness while age, afflicted side with lymphedema, history of chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were considered as covariates.

Results

The mean age of patients was 52.66 ± 12.20 years. In all 132 patients, out of 169 patients (71.3%) reported pain and 155 patients (83.7%) reported heaviness at baseline. However, after intervention, the cumulative percentage of patients with at least a one category reduction in pain and heaviness was 86.4% and 83%, respectively. At least seven sessions of CDT were shown to be sufficient in alleviating the severity of the symptoms in greater than 83% of patients.

Conclusions

The combined decongestive therapy significantly reduced the intensities of pain and heaviness in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Keywords

Breast cancer Lymphedema Pain Combined decongestive therapy 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the BCRC’s review board and the ethics committee of the Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR). All participants completed the informed consent form.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Lopez Penha TR, Slangen JJ, Heuts EM, Voogd AC, Von Meyenfeldt MF (2011) Prevalence of lymphoedema more than five years after breast cancer treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:1059–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paiva DM, Rodrigues VO, Cesca MG, Palma PV, Leite IC (2013) Prevalence of lymphedema in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer in a referral center in southeastern Brazil. BMC Womens Health 13:6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-13-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miller CL, Specht MC, Skolny MN, Horick N, Jammallo LS, O'Toole J, Shenouda MN, Sadek BT, Smith BL, Taghian AG (2014) Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:71–77.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-014-2856-34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shih YC, Xu Y, Cormier JN, Giordano S, Ridner SH, Buchholz TA, Perkins GH, Elting LS (2009) Incidence, treatment costs, and complications of lymphedema after breast cancer among women of working age: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 27:2007–2014.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.18.3517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McWayne J, Heiney SP (2005) Psychologic and social sequelae of secondary lymphedema: a review. Cancer 104:457–466.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Teo I, Novy DM, Chang DW, Cox MG, Fingeret MC (2015) Examining pain, body image, and depressive symptoms in patients with lymphedema secondary to breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 24:1377–1383.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.37457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pyszel A, Malyszczak K, Pyszel K, Andrzejak R, Szuba A (2006) Disability, psychological distress and quality of life in breast cancer survivors with arm lymphedema. Lymphology 39:185–192Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newman ML, Brennan M, Passik S (1996) Lymphedema complicated by pain and psychological distress: a case with complex treatment needs. J Pain Symptom Manag 12:376–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sitzia J, Sobrido L (1997) Measurement of health-related quality of life of patients receiving conservative treatment for limb lymphoedema using the Nottingham health profile. Qual Life Res 6:373–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed RL, Prizment A, Lazovich D, Schmitz KH, Folsom AR (2008) Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's health study. J Clin Oncol 26:5689–5696.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moffatt CJ, Franks PJ, Doherty DC, Williams A, Badger C, Jeffs E, Bosanquet N, Mortimer P (2003) Lymphoedema: an underestimated health problem. Qjm 96(10):731–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Passik SD, McDonald MV (1998) Psychosocial aspects of upper extremity lymphedema in women treated for breast carcinoma. Cancer 83(S12B):2817–2820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chachaj A, Małyszczak K, Pyszel K, Lukas J, Tarkowski R, Pudełko M, Andrzejak R, Szuba A (2010) Physical and psychological impairments of women with upper limb lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Psycho-Oncology 19:299–305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Committee E (2016) The diagnosis and treatment of peripheral lymphedema: 2016 consensus document of the International Society of Lymphology. Lymphology 49:170–184Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamner JB, Fleming MD (2007) Lymphedema therapy reduces the volume of edema and pain in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1904–1908.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-006-9332-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Buragadda S, Alhusaini AA, Melam GR, Arora N (2015) Effect of complete decongestive therapy and a home program for patients with post mastectomy lymphedema. J Phys Ther Sci 27:2743–2748.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.2743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kasseroller RG (1998) The Vodder School: the Vodder method. Cancer 83(12 Suppl American):2840–2842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reed MD, Van Nostran W (2014) Assessing pain intensity with the visual analog scale: a plea for uniformity. J Clin Pharmacol 54:241–244.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA (2003) Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med 10:1128–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szolnoky G, Varga E, Varga M, Tuczai M, Dósa-Rácz E, Kemény L (2011) Lymphedema treatment decreases pain intensity in lipedema. Lymphology 44:178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Quality of life Department, Breast Cancer Research CenterMotamed Cancer Institute, ACECRTehranIran
  2. 2.Integrative Oncology Department, Breast Cancer Research CenterMotamed Cancer Institute, ACECRTehranIran
  3. 3.Research Department, Tehran Heart CenterTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  4. 4.Population Health Research Group, Health Metrics Research CenterIranian Institute for Health Sciences Research, ACECRTehranIran
  5. 5.Lymphedema Clinic, Breast Cancer Research CenterMotamed Cancer Institute, ACECRTehranIran

Personalised recommendations