Self-perceived burden mediates the relationship between self-stigma and quality of life among Chinese American breast cancer survivors
Cancer-related self-stigma (the internalized sense of shame about having cancer) has been found to associate with poorer quality of life (QoL) among cancer survivors. However, culturally salient illness beliefs (e.g., cancer is contagious; cancer is a result of karma; and cancer brings shame to the family) may make Chinese cancer survivors vulnerable to self-stigmatization. This study examined the association between self-stigma and QoL among Chinese American breast cancer survivors (BCS). To understand the potential mechanism, the mediating role of self-perceived burden to caregivers between self-stigma and QoL was also examined.
Chinese American BCS (n = 136) were recruited through community-based cancer associations. Participants’ self-stigma, self-perceived burden, and QoL were measured in a questionnaire package.
Structural equation modeling results supported the proposed mediation model in predicting physical QoL (χ2(100) = 123.041, CFI = 0.982, TLI = 0.975, RMSEA = 0.041) and emotional QoL (χ2(84) = 137.277, CFI = 0.958, TLI = 0.940, RMSEA = 0.069), with satisfactory model fit indices. Both the indirect effects from self-stigma to QoL via self-perceived burden (physical: β = − 0.13; 95% CI = − 0.22, − 0.07 and emotional: β = − 0.11; 95% CI = − 0.22, − 0.04) and the direct effects from self-stigma to poorer QoL were significant (physical: β = − 0.22; 95% CI = −0.34, −0.10 and emotional: β = − 0.39; 95% CI = − 0.54, − 0.23), suggesting a partial mediation effect of self-perceived burden between self-stigma and QoL.
Self-stigma could reduce physical and emotional QoL through increasing self-perceived burden. Interventions aiming to reduce Chinese American BCS’ self-stigma and perceptions of burdensomeness may facilitate improvement in QoL, which in turn promotes better cancer survivorship.
KeywordsCancer Oncology Quality of life Burden Self-stigma Chinese
This study was supported by the American Cancer Society MRSGT-10-011-01-CPPB (PI: Qian Lu) and National Cancer Institute R01CA180896-01A1 (PI: Qian Lu).
Compliance with ethical standards
This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Houston.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer facts & figures 2016. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 5.Warmoth K, Cheung B, You J, Yeung NCY, Lu Q (2017) Exploring the social needs and challenges of Chinese American immigrant breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study using an expressive writing approach. Int J Behav Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-017-9661-4
- 12.Crocker J, Quinn DM (2000) Social stigma and the self: meanings, situations, and self-esteem. In: Heatherton TF, Kleck RE, Hebl MR, Hull JG (eds) The social psychology of stigma. Guilford, New York, pp 153–183Google Scholar
- 28.Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 30.Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modelling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 37.McPherson CJ, Wilson KG, Chyurlia L, Leclerc C (2010) The balance of give and take in caregiver-partner relationships: an examination of self-perceived burden, relationship equity, and quality of life from the perspective of care recipients following stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology 55:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar