Evaluating a professional patient navigation intervention in a supportive care setting
- 36 Downloads
Unmet supportive care needs are common among cancer patients. This study evaluates a patient navigation intervention (i.e., specially trained oncology nurse who monitors, advises, and (if needed) refers patients to supportive cancer care) in terms of need, satisfaction, advice uptake, and consumption of supportive cancer care.
Using a cross-sectional design, the intervention was evaluated among healthcare professionals, patients who participated, and patients who did not participate in the intervention. All patients were newly diagnosed with breast cancer or melanoma. Data was collected through medical records and online surveys.
In total, 1091 patients were offered patient navigation. Most of these patients (755) were willing to consult the patient navigator (PN). Approximately 90% of patients who completed both the intervention and the questionnaire (N = 120, response rate 54%) perceived the PN as valuable, accessible, and reliable. Approximately 80% of respondents who needed advice regarding nutrition (n = 67), fatigue (n = 98), emotions (n = 106), and work (n = 79) were adequately informed by the PN. Of the 120 respondents, 59 used some form of supportive cancer care. Most of the responding healthcare professionals (N = 70, response rate 45%) perceived the intervention as a valuable addition to current cancer care (n = 51) and mentioned that the PN should be available to all patients (n = 54).
The intervention was perceived as valuable by both patients and healthcare professionals. The results may, however, been biased by the large number of patients who were omitted from participation due to logistical reasons.
KeywordsPatient navigation Unmet needs Supportive care Cancer
We would like to thank the patient navigators Marit van de Water, Anke van der Pol, and Nanda Wiegman for carrying out the intervention activities. Our thanks also goes to Stichting OOK, which contributed to the intervention in an intellectual way.
This project was funded by the Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Compliance with ethical standards
Permission for data collection was granted by the Medical Ethical Committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute (registered: METC18.1633). Since the study concerned evaluation of existing healthcare, it did not fall under the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (Wet Medisch Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek). Hence, obtaining informed consent was not required.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. LondonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Mertz BG, Dunn-Henriksen AK, Kroman N, Johansen C, Andersen KG, Andersson M, Mathiesen UB, Vibe-Petersen J, Dalton SO, Envold Bidstrup P (2017) The effects of individually tailored nurse navigation for patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: a randomized pilot study. Acta Oncol 56:1682–1689Google Scholar
- 13.White VM, Macvean ML, Grogan S, d'Este C, Akkerman D, Ieropoli S, Hill DJ, Sanson-Fisher R (2012) Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology 21:1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bouwmans C, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Koopmanschap M, Krol M, Severens H, Brouwer W (2013) Handleiding imta medical cost questionnaire (imcq). In: Editor (ed)^(eds) Book Handleiding imta medical cost questionnaire (imcq). Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, CityGoogle Scholar
- 19.Jean-Pierre P, Fiscella K, Winters PC, Post D, Wells KJ, McKoy JM, Battaglia T, Simon MA, Kilbourn K (2012) Psychometric development and reliability analysis of a patient satisfaction with interpersonal relationship with navigator measure: a multi-site patient navigation research program study. Psycho-Oncology 21:986–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (2009) Blauwdruk kanker en werkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (2017) Detecteren behoefte psychosociale zorgGoogle Scholar
- 23.Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (2017) Algemene voedings- en dieetbehandelingGoogle Scholar
- 27.Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (2011) Oncologische revalidatieGoogle Scholar
- 30.Muscaritoli M, Lucia S, Farcomeni A, Lorusso V, Saracino V, Barone C, Plastino F, Gori S, Magarotto R, Carteni G, Chiurazzi B, Pavese I, Marchetti L, Zagonel V, Bergo E, Tonini G, Imperatori M, Iacono C, Maiorana L, Pinto C, Rubino D, Cavanna L, Di Cicilia R, Gamucci T, Quadrini S, Palazzo S, Minardi S, Merlano M, Colucci G, Marchetti P, PreMi OSG (2017) Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the premio study. Oncotarget 8:79884–79896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.van Waart H, Stuiver MM, van Harten WH, Geleijn E, Kieffer JM, Buffart LM, de Maaker-Berkhof M, Boven E, Schrama J, Geenen MM, Meerum Terwogt JM, van Bochove A, Lustig V, van den Heiligenberg SM, Smorenburg CH, Hellendoorn-van Vreeswijk JA, Sonke GS, Aaronson NK (2015) Effect of low-intensity physical activity and moderate- to high-intensity physical exercise during adjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness, fatigue, and chemotherapy completion rates: results of the paces randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 33:1918–1927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Schuurhuizen CS, Braamse AM, Beekman AT, Bomhof-Roordink H, Bosmans JE, Cuijpers P, Hoogendoorn AW, Konings IR, van der Linden MH, Neefjes EC, Verheul HM, Dekker J (2015) Screening and treatment of psychological distress in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: study protocol of the tes trial. BMC Cancer 15:302CrossRefGoogle Scholar