Advertisement

Physical problems, functional limitations, and preferences for physical therapist-guided exercise programs among Dutch patients with metastatic breast cancer: a mixed methods study

  • M. R. ten Tusscher
  • W. G. Groen
  • E. Geleijn
  • G. S. Sonke
  • I. R. Konings
  • M. J. Van der Vorst
  • A. van Zweeden
  • N. K. Aaronson
  • Martijn M. StuiverEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

In this study we aimed (1) to identify the most prevalent physical symptoms and functional limitations that limit physical activity of patients with palliative treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and (2) to identify their preferences for exercise-based physical therapy programs, as a first step towards the development of physical therapist (PT)-guided exercise programs for patients with MBC.

Methods

We performed a mixed-method study that comprised a cross-sectional survey and two focus group sessions among patients with MBC. Survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The focus groups were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed independently by two researchers, using directed content analysis.

Results

A total of 114 women (response rate 61%) completed the survey (mean age 63.5, SD 10.2). Eighty-six percent of the women reported at least some level of physical problems limiting their ability to be physically active, of whom 46% reported substantial problems. The most prevalent problems were fatigue, painful joints, painful muscles, and shortness of breath. Uptake of exercise appeared to be limited. Exercise preferences varied strongly. Fifty-three percent indicated a preference for some form of PT-supervision, and 34% for a prolonged period of time (> 8 weeks). Focus group results clarified that patients’ preferences for supervision, by PTs with special qualifications in oncology, were related to feelings of insecurity about their ability to self-manage physical functioning.

Conclusions

Patients with MBC experience a broad range of physical health problems that limit their ability to be physically active. While preferences vary strongly, patients with MBC would value the availability of high quality, PT-guided, tailored exercise programs.

Keywords

Metastatic breast cancer Exercise Physical therapy Functional limitations Quality of life 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Adriënne Veraart, Rachel Verbeek, and Fleurine van Beek for their contributions to the project and Pink Ribbon for supporting this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Aaronson, Dr. Stuiver, and E. Geleijn report a grant from the Dutch Cancer Foundation KWF/Pink Ribbon supporting this study. Dr. Sonke reports unrelated grants from Astra-Zeneca, Novartis, Roche, and Merck.

We have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Buffart LM, Kalter J, Sweegers MG, Courneya KS, Newton RU, Aaronson NK, Jacobsen PB, May AM, Galvao DA, Chinapaw MJ, Steindorf K, Irwin ML, Stuiver MM, Hayes S, Griffith KA, Lucia A, Mesters I, van Weert E, Knoop H, Goedendorp MM, Mutrie N, Daley AJ, McConnachie A, Bohus M, Thorsen L, Schulz KH, Short CE, James EL, Plotnikoff RC, Arbane G, Schmidt ME, Potthoff K, van Beurden M, Oldenburg HS, Sonke GS, van Harten WH, Garrod R, Schmitz KH, Winters-Stone KM, Velthuis MJ, Taaffe DR, van Mechelen W, Kersten MJ, Nollet F, Wenzel J, Wiskemann J, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Brug J (2017) Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer Treat Rev 52:91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, Snyder C (2012) Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD007566Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Galvao DA, Pinto BM, Irwin ML, Wolin KY, Segal RJ, Lucia A, Schneider CM, von Gruenigen VE, Schwartz AL (2010) American College of Sports M. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42(7):1409–1426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mariotto AB, Etzioni R, Hurlbert M, Penberthy L, Mayer M (2017) Estimation of the number of women living with metastatic breast cancer in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 26(6):809–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sheill G, Guinan E, Neill LO, Hevey D, Hussey J (2018) Physical activity and advanced cancer: the views of oncology and palliative care physicians in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 187(2):337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heywood R, McCarthy AL, Skinner TL (2017) Safety and feasibility of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 25(10):3031–3050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dittus KL, Gramling RE, Ades PA (2017) Exercise interventions for individuals with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Prev Med 104:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Salakari MR, Surakka T, Nurminen R, Pylkkanen L (2015) Effects of rehabilitation among patients with advances cancer: a systematic review. Acta Oncol 54(5):618–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ligibel JA, Giobbie-Hurder A, Shockro L, Campbell N, Partridge AH, Tolaney SM, Lin NU, Winer EP (2016) Randomized trial of a physical activity intervention in women with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 122(8):1169–1177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Headley JA, Ownby KK, John LD (2004) The effect of seated exercise on fatigue and quality of life in women with advanced breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 31(5):977–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oldervoll LM, Loge JH, Paltiel H, Asp MB, Vidvei U, Hjermstad MJ, Kaasa S (2005) Are palliative cancer patients willing and able to participate in a physical exercise program? Palliat Support Care 3(4):281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lowe SS, Watanabe SM, Baracos VE, Courneya KS (2010) Physical activity interests and preferences in palliative cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 18(11):1469–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu RD, Buffart LM, Kersten MJ, Spiering M, Brug J, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ (2011) Psychometric properties of two physical activity questionnaires, the AQuAA and the PASE, in cancer patients. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granger CL, Parry SM, Denehy L (2015) The self-reported physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE) is a valid and clinically applicable measure in lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 23(11):3211–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA (1999) The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 52(7):643–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alberts M, Smets EM, Vercoulen JH, Garssen B, Bleijenberg G (1997) ‘Abbreviated fatigue questionnaire’: a practical tool in the classification of fatigue. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 141(31):1526–1530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, Lindeman E, van der Heijden GJ, Regtop W, Knipschild PG (1999) A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manip Physiol Ther 22(3):144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centers. Guideline Cancer Rehabilitation 2017. Available from https://www.oncoline.nl/medisch-specialistischerevalidatie-bij-oncologie [Dutch]. Accessed July 2018
  20. 20.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(5):365–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kokkonen K, Saarto T, Makinen T, Pohjola L, Kautio H, Jarvenpaa S, Puustjarvi-Sunabacka K (2017) The functional capacity and quality of life of women with advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer 24(1):128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bender CM, Ergyn FS, Rosenzweig MQ, Cohen SM, Sereika SM (2005) Symptom clusters in breast cancer across 3 phases of the disease. Cancer Nurs 28(3):219-25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Costa WA, Eleuterio J Jr, Giraldo PC, Goncalves AK (2017) Quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 63(7):583–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ecclestone C, Chow R, Pulenzas N, Zhang L, Leahey A, Hamer J, DeAngelis C, Bedard G, McDonald R, Bhatia A, Ellis J, Rakovitch E, Vuong S, Chow E, Verma S (2016) Quality of life and symptom burden in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 24(9):4035–4043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cleeland C, von Moos R, Walker MS, Wang Y, Gao J, Chavez-MacGregor M, Liede A, Arellano J, Balakumaran A, Qian Y (2016) Burden of symptoms associated with development of metastatic bone disease in patients with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 24(8):3557–3565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Niklasson A, Paty J, Ryden A (2017) Talking about breast cancer: which symptoms and treatment side effects are important to patients with advanced disease? Patient 10(6):719–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vilhauer RP (2008) A qualitative study of the experiences of women with metastatic breast cancer. Palliat Support Care 6(3):249–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Irwin ML, Cartmel B, Gross CP, Ercolano E, Li F, Yao X, Fiellin M, Capozza S, Rothbard M, Zhou Y, Harrigan M, Sanft T, Schmitz K, Neogi T, Hershman D, Ligibel J (2015) Randomized exercise trial of aromatase inhibitor-induced arthralgia in breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33(10):1104–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heywood R, McCarthy AL, Skinner TL (2018) Efficacy of exercise interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 99:2595–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koelwyn GJ, Jones LW, Hornsby W, Eves ND (2012) Exercise therapy in the management of dyspnea in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 6(2):129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Scott N, Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bottomley A, de Graeff A, Groenvold M, Gundy C, Koller M, Petersen MA, Sprangers M (2008) EORTC QLQ-C30. Reference values Brussels: EORTCGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cormie P, Newton RU, Spry N, Joseph D, Taaffe DR, Galvao DA (2013) Safety and efficacy of resistance exercise in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 16(4):328–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cormie P, Galvao DA, Spry N, Joseph D, Taaffe DR, Newton RU (2014) Functional benefits are sustained after a program of supervised resistance exercise in cancer patients with bone metastases: longitudinal results of a pilot study. Support Care Cancer 22(6):1537–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N, Cormie P, Joseph D, Chambers SK, Chee R, Peddle-McIntyre CJ, Hart NH, Baumann FT, Denham J, Baker M, Newton RU (2018) Exercise preserves physical function in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Med Sci Sports Exerc 50(3):393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anderson RT, Kimmick GG, McCoy TP, Hopkins J, Levine E, Miller G, Ribisl P, Mihalko SL (2012) A randomized trial of exercise on well-being and function following breast cancer surgery: the RESTORE trial. J Cancer Surviv 6(2):172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van Waart H, van Harten WH, Buffart LM, Sonke GS, Stuiver MM, Aaronson NK (2016) Why do patients choose (not) to participate in an exercise trial during adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer? Psychooncology 25(8):964–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG (2006) Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol 59(10):1087–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. ten Tusscher
    • 1
  • W. G. Groen
    • 2
  • E. Geleijn
    • 3
  • G. S. Sonke
    • 4
  • I. R. Konings
    • 5
  • M. J. Van der Vorst
    • 5
    • 6
  • A. van Zweeden
    • 5
    • 7
  • N. K. Aaronson
    • 2
  • Martijn M. Stuiver
    • 1
    • 3
    • 8
    Email author
  1. 1.Center for Quality of LifeThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Division of Psychosocial Research and EpidemiologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement SciencesAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Medical OncologyThe Netherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Department of Medical OncologyAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam/Cancer Center AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Department of Internal MedicineRijnstate HospitalArnhemthe Netherlands
  7. 7.Department of Internal MedicineAmstelland HospitalAmstelveenThe Netherlands
  8. 8.ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of HealthUniversity of Applied Sciences AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations