Advertisement

Cancer survivorship care after curative treatment: Chinese oncology practitioners’ practices

  • Qiuping LiEmail author
  • Yi Lin
  • Yinghua XuEmail author
  • Alex Molassiotis
Original Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To establish oncology practitioners’ perceptions of responsibility, confidence levels, and frequency of survivorship care practice in relation to the post-treatment phase of survivorship care in Mainland China; to identify factors associated with oncology practitioners’ perceptions of responsibility, confidence levels, and frequency of survivorship care practice; and to examine factors that impede the provision of quality survivorship care.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey of Chinese oncology practitioners was conducted using a test battery consisting of a self-developed information sheet, a 29-item survivorship care scale (29-SCS), and a 16-item impeding factors scale.

Results

There were 331 participants. Mean values of the four subscales (8.87, 61.82, 18.62, and 40.49) on perceptions of responsibility were relatively higher than those of the mean values of confidence levels and frequency of survivorship care practice. Participant characteristics, including professional discipline, highest educational qualification achieved, work status, work role, and work setting, were identified as factors associated with oncology practitioners’ responsibility perceptions, confidence levels, and survivorship care practice frequency. The top three barriers to quality survivorship care perceived by participants were lack of time, an appropriate physical location, and evidence-based practice guidelines to inform survivorship care.

Conclusions

Findings of relatively high levels of perception of responsibility and low levels of confidence in survivorship care suggest that survivorship care is needed, with the aim of implementing oncology practitioners’ responsibility and improving their confidence in providing survivorship care in cancer practice. Future multiple levels of cooperation for overcoming barriers and implementing quality survivorship care are highly recommended.

Keywords

Cancer Oncology Survivorship care Oncology practitioners Practice patterns Perspectives Barriers Mainland China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author (Qiuping LI) is especially grateful to Professor Raymond Javan CHAN (School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology) for his valuable comments on the previous version of the manuscript. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the related hospital and all the participants for their sharing of their experience in this study.

Author contributions

Qiuping Li: Study conception/design; data collection/analysis; drafting of manuscript.

Yi Lin and Yinghua Xu: Data collection/analysis; drafting of manuscript.

Alex Molassiotis: Critical revisions for important intellectual content.

Funding

Financial support of this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81773297). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Disclosures

We (the authors) have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation (2018) Cancer Fact sheet. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  2. 2.
    Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J (2016) Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 66(2):115–132.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarrett N, Scott I, Addingtonhall J, Amir Z, Brearley S, Hodges L, Richardson A, Sharpe M, Stamataki Z, Stark D (2013) Informing future research priorities into the psychological and social problems faced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(5):510–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA (2010) Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 112(S11):2577–2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molassiotis A, Yates P, Li Q, So WKW, Pongthavornkamol K, Pittayapan P, Komatsu H, Thandar M, Li MS, Titus Chacko S, Lopez V, Butcon J, Wyld D, Chan RJ (2017) Mapping unmet supportive care needs, quality-of-life perceptions and current symptoms in cancer survivors across the Asia-Pacific region: results from the International STEP Study. Ann Oncol 28(10):2552–2558.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx350 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship (2014) Defining cancer survivorship. http://www.canceradvocacy.org/news/defining-cancer-survivorship/. Accessed 21 Feb 2018
  7. 7.
    Fitch MI (2008) Supportive care framework. Can Oncol Nurs J 18(1):6–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Committee on Cancer Survivorship: Improving care and quality of life NCPB, Institute of Medicine, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (2005) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transitionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao P, Dai M, Chen W, Li N (2010) Cancer trends in China. Jpn J Clin Oncol 40(4):281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miura A, Matsuda Y, Ogawa I, Takagai J, Hirai K, Hosoda Y, Suzukz S, Onishi K (2015) Oncology nurses’ recognition of long-term cancer survivorship care in Japan. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2(3):136–143.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2347-5625.163412 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birken SA, Presseau J, Ellis SD, Gerstel AA, Mayer DK (2014) Potential determinants of health-care professionals’ use of survivorship care plans: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci 9:167.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-014-0167-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dulko D, Pace CM, Dittus KL, Sprague BL, Pollack LA, Hawkins NA, Geller BM (2013) Barriers and facilitators to implementing cancer survivorship care plans. Oncol Nurs Forum 40(6):575–580.  https://doi.org/10.1188/13.onf.575-580 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye AY, Cheung WY, Goddard KJ, Horvat D, Olson RA (2015) Follow-up patterns of cancer survivors: a survey of Canadian radiation oncologists. J Cancer Surviv 9(3):388–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0390-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ng T, Toh MR, Cheung YT, Chan A (2015) Follow-up care practices and barriers to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives from Asian oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer 23(11):3193–3200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2700-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan RJ, Yates P, Li Q, Komatsu H, Lopez V, Thandar M, Chacko ST, So WKW, Pongthavornkamol K, Yi M, Pittayapan P, Butcon J, Wyld D, Molassiotis A (2017) Oncology practitioners’ perspectives and practice patterns of post-treatment cancer survivorship care in the Asia-Pacific region: results from the STEP study. BMC Cancer 17(1):715.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3733-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu ML (2010) Statistical analysis of questionnaires: SPSS operation and application. Chongqing University Press, ChongqingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A (2005) Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 14(1):26–33.  https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.011155 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chan R, Wallace A, Downs E, Langbecker D, Ekberg S, Gates P, Chan A, Yates P (2016) Cancer nurses’ provision of survivorship care for patients with haematological malignancy. Support Care Cancer 24(Suppl 1):S221Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wallace A, Downs E, Gates P, Thomas A, Yates P, Chan RJ (2015) Provision of survivorship care for patients with haematological malignancy at completion of treatment: a cancer nursing practice survey study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19(5):516–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2015.02.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Health Organisation (2014) Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/. Accessed 22 Feb 2018
  21. 21.
    Yip WC, Hsiao WC, Chen W, Hu S, Ma J, Maynard A (2012) Early appraisal of China’s huge and complex health-care reforms. Lancet 379(9818):833–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ganz PA, Yip CH, Gralow JR, Distelhorst SR, Albain KS, Andersen BL, Bevilacqua JL, de Azambuja E, El Saghir NS, Kaur R, McTiernan A, Partridge AH, Rowland JH, Singh-Carlson S, Vargo MM, Thompson B, Anderson BO (2013) Supportive care after curative treatment for breast cancer (survivorship care): resource allocations in low- and middle-income countries. A Breast Health Global Initiative 2013 consensus statement. Breast 22(5):606–615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nolte L, Kinnane N, Lai-Kwon J, Gates P, Shilkin P, Jefford M (2016) The impact of survivorship care planning on patients, general practitioners, and hospital-based staff. Cancer Nurs 39(6):E26–e35.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000329 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wuxi School of MedicineJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  2. 2.Wuxi People’s HospitalWuxiChina
  3. 3.School of NursingThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityKowloon,Hong Kong

Personalised recommendations