Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1911–1918 | Cite as

Construction of new personal meanings by cancer patients: a qualitative analysis in an Italian patient population

  • Loredana BuonaccorsoEmail author
  • Gianfranco Martucci
  • Guido Miccinesi
  • Alice Maruelli
  • Carla Ripamonti
Original Article
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study is to investigate the meaning that cancer patients in active therapy and/or rehabilitation give to their illness and resources they rely on to build new experiences of meaning and a future perspective.

Methods

The present study consisted in a summative content analysis of answers to open questions of the Purpose In Life (PIL) Questionnaire administered to 158 consecutive patients with non-advanced cancer (no metastases). The PIL is an attitude scale that indicates the degree of attainment of meaning and purpose in life and is divided into three sections: a first 20-item quantitative section, with statements rated on a 7-point verbal scale with two anchoring phrases (part A); a qualitative section with 13 open-end items and paragraph composition section addressing the future goals (part B) and past meaningful experience (part C). For the present study, we analyzed the answers to open questions, most interesting in a therapeutic contest related to the meanings associated with life, illness, and suffering to understand the experienced of the cancer patients.

Results

The main recurring themes in PIL section B analyzed associated to the sense of life, disease, and death are as follows: meaning (positive/negative), personal dimension, religiousness; physical health, family, normal life; negative sense of death, the end, natural transition, religious belief, consolation, mystery, rejection; opportunity, negativity. Whereas main themes emerging from section C were associated to life goals of the interviewed patients: the desire of realization in the future perspective; the value of life; physical health and healing; guiding values; plus three more themes, distinguishable, but with a minor recurrence: legacy responsibility, religiousness, lack of purpose/resignation.

Conclusion

The use of summative content analysis evidenced the recurrence of a strong sense of positivity, present in the majority of the interviews. In particular, this positivity is shown by the use of words associated frequently to self-consciousness and self-evaluation, desire of happiness, and desire of contributing to the good of significant others and of taking care of your own life in order to give a positive contribution.

Keywords

Awareness Meaning Sense Cancer Spiritual well-being 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Approval was obtained from the ethics committees of all participating centers, with the number 68/2010 Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

520_2018_4444_MOESM1_ESM.exr (311 kb)
ESM 1 (EXR 310 kb)
520_2018_4444_MOESM2_ESM.exr (291 kb)
ESM 2 (EXR 290 kb)
520_2018_4444_MOESM3_ESM.exr (275 kb)
ESM 3 (EXR 274 kb)
520_2018_4444_MOESM4_ESM.exr (213 kb)
ESM 4 (EXR 212 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Grassi L, Spiegel D, Riba M (2017) Advancing psychosocial care in cancer patients. F1000Research 6(F1000 Faculty Rev):2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell AJ, Chan M, Bhatti H, Halton M, Grassi L, Johansen C, Meader N (2011) Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 12:160–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70002-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grassi L, Caruso R, Mitchell AJ, Sabato S, Nanni MG (2018) Screening for emotional disorders in patients with cancer using the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the BSI-18 versus a standardized psychiatric interview (the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview). Cancer 124:2415–2426.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robinson S, Kissane DW, Brooker J, Burney S (2015) A systematic review of the demoralization syndrome in individuals with progressive disease and cancer: a decade of research. J Pain Symptom Manag 49(3):595–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Manne S, Badr H, Zaider T, Nelson C, Kissane D (2010) Cancer-related communication, relationship intimacy, and psychological distress among couples coping with localized prostate cancer. J Cancer Surviv 4(1):74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lynch J, Goodhart F, Saunders Y, O’Connor SJ (2011) Screening for psychological distress in patients with lung cancer: results of a clinical audit evaluating the use of the patient distress thermometer. Support Care Cancer 19:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher L (2010) Psychological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linley PA, Joseph S (2011) Meaning in life and posttraumatic growth. J Loss Trauma 16:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee V (2008) The existential plight of cancer: meaning making as a concrete approach to the intangible search for meaning. Support Care Cancer 16:779–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Breitbart W (2002) Spirituality and meaning in supportive care: spirituality and meaning-centered group psychotherapy intervention in advanced cancer. 2001. Support Care Cancer 10(4):272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosenfeld B, Cham H, Pessin H, Breitbart W (2018) Why is Meaning-Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP) effective? Enhanced sense of meaning as the mechanism of change for advanced cancer patients. Psychooncology 27(2):654–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nelson C, Jacobson CM, Weinberger MI, Bhaskaran V, Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Roth AJ (2009) The role of spirituality in the relationship between religiosity and depression in prostate cancer patients. Ann Behav Med 38(2):105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee V, Robin Cohen S, Edgar L, Laizner AM, Gagnon AJ (2006) Meaning-making intervention during breast or colorectal cancer treatment improves self-esteem, optimism, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med 62:3133–3145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Spek N, Vos J, van Uden-Kraan CF, Breitbart W, Tollenaar RAEM, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2013) Meaning making in cancer survivors: a focus group study. PLoS One 8(9):e76089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steinhauser KE, Alexander SC, Byock IR, George LK, Olsen MK, Tulsky JA (2008) Do preparation and life completion discussions improve functioning and quality of life in seriously ill patients? Pilot randomized control trial. J Palliat Med 11:1234–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Boldini S, Pessi MA, Chiesi F, Miccinesi G (2012) Hope Herth Index (HHI): a validation study in Italian patients with solid and hematological malignancies on active cancer treatment. Tumori 98:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ripamonti CI, Buonaccorso L, Maruelli A, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Boldini S, Primi C, Miccinesi G (2012) Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire: the validation study in Italian patients with solid and haematological cancers on active oncological treatments. Tumori 98(4):491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maruelli A, Ripamonti C, Bandieri E et al (2014) Sexual satisfaction assessment in 194 nonmetastatic cancer patients on treatment or in follow-up. Tumori 100(2):232–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ripamonti CI, Bandieri E, Pessi MA, Maruelli A, Buonaccorso L, Miccinesi G (2014) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) as a screening tool for depression and anxiety in non-advanced patients with solid or haematological malignancies on cure or follow-up. Support Care Cancer 22(3):783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Crumbaugh JC, Maholick LT Manual of instructions for the Purpose in Life test. Viktor Frankl Institute of Logotherapy, Abilene, p 1069Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brunelli C, Bianchi L, Murru P et al (2012) Italian Validation of The Purpose In Life (PIL) test and the Seeking Of Noetic Goals (SONG) test in a population of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20:2775–2783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL (1999) Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol 38(3):215–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Holtmaat K, van der Spek N, Witte BI, Breitbart W, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2017) Moderators of the effects of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors on personal meaning, psychological well-being, and distress. Support Care Cancer 25:3385–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chochinov HM, McClement S, Hack T, Thompson G, Dufault B, Harlos M (2015) Eliciting personhood within clinical practice: effects on patients, families, and healthcare providers. J Pain Symptom Manag 49:974–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arantzamendi M, Belar A, Martínez M (2016) Promoting patient-centred palliative care: a scoping review of the patient dignity question. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 10(4):324–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Golombok S Modern families. Parents and children in new family forms. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schumacher JR, Palta M, Loconte NK et al (2013) Characterizing the psychological distress response before and after a cancer diagnosis. J Behav Med 36:591–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hannum SM, Rubinstein RL (2016 Jan) The meaningfulness of time; narratives of cancer among chronically ill older adults. J Aging Stud 36:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chochinov HM, Hassard T, McClement S et al (2008) The patient dignity inventory: a novel way of measuring dignity-related distress in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 36(6):559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psycho-oncology Unit, Scientific DirectionAzienda Usl - IRCSS Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  2. 2.Italian League for the Fight Against Cancer (LILT) Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  3. 3.Istituto per lo studio e la prevenzione oncologica della ToscanaFlorenceItaly
  4. 4.Psychology UnitLILT and Center for Oncological Rehabilitation-CERION of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  5. 5.Oncology-Supportive Care Unit, Department Oncology-Hematology Fondazione IRCSSIstituto Nazionale dei TumoriMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations