Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 887–894 | Cite as

Sexual health in cancer: the results of a survey exploring practices, attitudes, knowledge, communication, and professional interactions in oncology healthcare providers

  • Thierry AlmontEmail author
  • Fadila Farsi
  • Ivan Krakowski
  • Rabih El Osta
  • Pierre Bondil
  • Éric Huyghe
Original Article



To assess, focusing on population of healthcare professionals providing oncosexology care to men with cancer, clinical practice, attitudes, knowledge, communication, and professional interaction.


We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study with an online self-administered e-questionnaire addressed to all medical, paramedical, or administrative professionals attending the 4th “Cancer, Sexuality and Fertility” Meeting in Toulouse, France. Their participation was voluntary and totally anonymous.


The 165 respondents comprised 44% of physicians, 47% of paramedics, and 9% of other health professionals in oncology, from all French regions. Paramedics were significantly younger than physicians (p = .006). One third of respondents were degreed in sexology, but 75.8% were in demand of oncosexology-specific trainings, particularly paramedics (p = .029). Regarding the oncosexology network, respondents declared being linked to organ specialists (56.8%), psychologists (49.5%), oncologists (47.4%), nurses (31.5%), radiation therapists (27.4%), and general practitioners (25.3%). Compared to paramedics, physicians were more likely to be engaged in oncosexology care (p = .039) and couple counseling (p = .005), but the proportions of counseled patients or couple were identical (p = .430 and p = .252, respectively). Overall, 90% of respondents reported discussing sexuality issues with patients. Regarding the time for discussion, physicians reported communicating more at cancer announcement (p = .004) or after treatments (p = .015), while more paramedics reported discussing at another time (p = .005). Regarding the place for discussion, paramedics more frequently reported talking about sexuality in the hospital room (p = .001) or during a specific consult (p = .007).


Results emphasize various levels for improving existing oncosexology care, such as developing oncosexology-specific educational and practical training programs, particularly for paramedics; consolidating information, counseling, and therapeutic education with formal procedures like implementing medical and paramedical “oncosexology moments,” or strengthening the community-hospital networks, from diagnosis to survivorship.


Healthcare professionals Oncosexology Clinical practice Communication Attitudes Training 



We gratefully acknowledge the 4th RCSF Organizing Committee for their valuable insights for implementing this study and particularly all the professionals who accepted to take part in the survey.

Compliance with ethical standards

The targeted population were all medical, paramedical, or administrative professionals, who have an activity in oncosexuality. Their participation was voluntary and totally anonymous. The link was available for 2 months, with another sending of emails during the second month, to optimize response rates.

Conflict of interest

The study was methodologically supported by the University Cancer Center of Toulouse (University Hospital of Rangueil), the Cancer Network of Midi-Pyrénées (ONCOMIP), the Association of Coordinators of the French Cancer Networks (ACORESCA), the joint group of the Federative Group of French Cancer Centers (UNICANCER), the French Association for Supportive Care (AFSOS), and the French Education and Research Group of Andrology, Urology, and Sexology (GEFRAUS).

This project was performed in the context of a PhD Fellowship granted by the French National League Against Cancer (PhD grant no. TDTJ12441—2013e2016). The authors report having no financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The authors also declare having full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Supplementary material

520_2018_4376_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (321 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 321 kb)


  1. 1.
    Schover LR, van der Kaaij M, van Dorst E, Creutzberg C, Huyghe E, Kiserud CE (2014) Sexual dysfunction and infertility as late effects of cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer Suppl 12(1):41–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sadovsky R, Basson R, Krychman M, Morales AM, Schover L, Wang R, Incrocci L (2010) Cancer and sexual problems. J Sex Med 7(1 Pt 2):349–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    National Health Institute (2006) The prevalence and types of sexual dysfunction in people with cancer. June 13, 2012
  4. 4.
    Bober SL, Varela VS (2012) Sexuality in adult cancer survivors: challenges and intervention. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3712–3719. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brotto LA, Yule M, Breckon E (2010) Psychological interventions for the sexual sequelae of cancer: a review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 4(4):346–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Institut National du Cancer (2014) La vie deux ans après un diagnostic de cancer - De l’annonce à l’après cancer. Accessed April 2018
  7. 7.
    Abdolrasulnia M, Shewchuk RM, Roepke N, Granstaff US, Dean J, Foster JA, Goldstein AT, Casebeer L (2010) Management of female sexual problems: perceived barriers, practice patterns, and confidence among primary care physicians and gynecologists. J Sex Med 7(7):2499–2508.
  8. 8.
    Carr S (2011) Communication about sexuality and cancer. In: Cancer and Sexual Health. vol chapter 20. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 307–316.
  9. 9.
    de Vocht H, Hordern A, Notter J, van de Wiel H (2011) Stepped skills: a team approach towards communication about sexuality and intimacy in cancer and palliative care. Australas Med J 4(11):610–619. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dyer K, das Nair R (2013) Why don’t healthcare professionals talk about sex? A systematic review of recent qualitative studies conducted in the United Kingdom. J Sex Med 10(11):2658–2670. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fitch MI, Beaudoin G, Johnson B (2013) Challenges having conversations about sexuality in ambulatory settings: part II—health care provider perspectives. Can Oncol Nurs J 23(3):182–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Flynn KE, Reese JB, Jeffery DD, Abernethy AP, Lin L, Shelby RA, Porter LS, Dombeck CB, Weinfurt KP (2012) Patient experiences with communication about sex during and after treatment for cancer. Psychooncology 21(6):594–601.
  13. 13.
    Forbat L, White I, Marshall-Lucette S, Kelly D (2012) Discussing the sexual consequences of treatment in radiotherapy and urology consultations with couples affected by prostate cancer. BJU Int 109 (1):98–103.
  14. 14.
    Julien JO, Thom B, Kline NE (2010) Identification of barriers to sexual health assessment in oncology nursing practice. Oncol Nurs Forum 37(3):E186–E190. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindau ST, Surawska H, Paice J, Baron SR (2011) Communication about sexuality and intimacy in couples affected by lung cancer and their clinical-care providers. Psycho-Oncology 20(2):179–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park ER, Norris RL, Bober SL (2009) Sexual health communication during cancer care: barriers and recommendations. Cancer J 15(1):74–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Abdolrasulnia M, Shewchuk RM, Roepke N, Granstaff US, Dean J, Foster JA, Goldstein AT, Casebeer L (2010) Management of female sexual problems: perceived barriers, practice patterns, and confidence among primary care physicians and gynecologists. J Sex Med 7(7):2499–2508. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huyghe E, Almont T, Burte C, Marx E, Habold D, BONDIL P (2016) Formations en onco-sexologie : existant et perspectives. Psycho-Oncologie 10(2):85–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krouwel EM, Nicolai MP, van der Wielen GJ, Putter H, Krol AD, Pelger RC, Incrocci L, Elzevier HW (2015) Sexual concerns after (pelvic) radiotherapy: is there any role for the radiation oncologist? J Sex Med 12(9):1927–1939. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Almont T, Delannes M, Ducassou A, Corman A, Bondil P, Moyal E, Schover L, Eric H (2017) Sexual quality of life and needs for sexual care of cancer patients admitted for radiotherapy : a 3-month cross-sectional study. J Sex Med 14(4):566–576. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rittenberg CN, Johnson JL, Kuncio GM (2010) An oral history of MASCC, its origin and development from MASCC’s beginnings to 2009. Support Care Cancer 18(6):775–784. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Letourneau JM, Smith JF, Ebbel EE, Craig A, Katz PP, Cedars MI, Rosen MP (2012) Racial, socioeconomic, and demographic disparities in access to fertility preservation in young women diagnosed with cancer. Cancer 118(18):4579–4588. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Carter J, Goldfrank D, Schover LR (2011) Simple strategies for vaginal health promotion in cancer survivors. J Sex Med 8(2):549–559. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Incrocci L, Jensen PT (2013) Pelvic radiotherapy and sexual function in men and women. J Sex Med 10 Suppl 1:53–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mulhall JP, Incrocci L, Goldstein I, Rosen R (2011) Cancer and sexual health. Current Clinical Urology. Humana Press, New York.
  26. 26.
    Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, Patiraki E (2009) Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of sexual health care in patients with cancer: critical review of the evidence. Support Care Cancer 17(5):479–501. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EA 3694 Human Fertility Research Group, CHU ToulousePaule de Viguier, Reproductive Medicine DepartmentToulouse cedex 9France
  2. 2.French Education and Research Group in Andrology, Urology and Sexology (GEFRAUS)Paule de Viguier University Hospital, Reproductive Medicine DepartmentToulouse cedex 9France
  3. 3.Francophone Association for Supportive Care (AFSOS)BèglesFrance
  4. 4.Urology Department of Brabois University HospitalCHU de NancyVandoeuvre les NancyFrance

Personalised recommendations