Examining trajectories of anxiety in men with prostate cancer faced with complex treatment decisions
- 153 Downloads
To examine changes in anxiety over time (trajectories) in men with prostate cancer faced with a decision to participate in a clinical trial and to identify demographic and study variables that predict these trajectories.
Our data come from a larger study examining the efficacy of a decision aid on decisional conflict in men with prostate cancer who were deciding whether to participate in a prostate cancer clinical trial. We used latent growth mixture models to identify ‘classes’ (i.e. groups) of participants with different trajectories of anxiety, as assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state scale, and binary logistic regression to determine predictors of anxiety ‘class’.
In 128 men with prostate cancer (mean age = 63), growth mixture modelling identified two classes defined by different anxiety trajectories. One class (n = 27) started with a higher mean anxiety score and did not change over time (stable high), whereas the second class (n = 101) started with lower anxiety and significantly reduced over time (low and recovering). None of the demographic and study variables (including age, education, marital status, and decision to join the trial) was predictive of anxiety class.
Men treated for prostate cancer who have high levels of anxiety after surgery may continue to have persistent high anxiety levels which do not reduce naturally over time. Patient or disease characteristics do not appear to predict anxiety. It is important, therefore, to monitor for anxiety in this population and refer for psychological interventions where required.
KeywordsProstate cancer Anxiety Trajectories Latent growth mixture model Patient decision-making
This study was supported by Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (Young Investigator Grant No. YI 0112) and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists Research Grant awarded to PS.
Compliance with ethical standards
Ethical approval was obtained from the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee and from site-specific research governance bodies at each participating site (HREC/11/RPAH/433).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Watts S et al (2013) Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates. BMJ Open 4:3Google Scholar
- 7.Lam WWT, Ye M, Fielding R (2013) Trajectories of quality of life among Chinese patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal cancer. PLoS One 7(9):e440022Google Scholar
- 13.Spielberger CD et al (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA (2006) An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
- 15.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2011) Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & MuthénGoogle Scholar