Convergent priorities and tensions: a qualitative study of the integration of complementary and alternative therapies with conventional cancer treatment
Demand for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is high among cancer patients. This, alongside growing evidence for the efficacy of some CAM therapies, is driving change within cancer centres, where evidence-based CAM therapies are increasingly provided alongside standard cancer treatments. In Australia, commitment to equitable access to healthcare is strong, and some cancer centres are now providing integrative services at no cost to the patient. This represents a significant shift in healthcare provision. This study aimed to examine health professional and patient dynamics in an integrated cancer service where CAM is provided at no cost to patients alongside standard cancer treatments. It specifically sought to understand what might drive or hinder further integration of CAM with standard treatment in the cancer context.
Qualitative interviews were undertaken with twenty key stakeholders—cancer patients, cancer nurses, and oncologists—who were delivering or receiving care in an Australian public hospital where acupuncture services are provided at no cost to patients alongside standard chemotherapy and radiation treatments.
Findings point to key areas where the concerns and priorities of cancer patients, cancer nurses, and oncologists converge and diverge in ways that reflect core personal and professional interests regarding patient care needs, the evidence base for CAM efficacy and safety, and rising healthcare costs.
Understanding points of convergence and divergence could assist clinicians and service providers in negotiating ways forward for integrative cancer services.
KeywordsCancer Supportive care Integrative medicine Complementary and alternative medicine
Compliance with ethical standards
Primary data for this study is held with authors named on the Human Research Ethics Approval. Data cannot be reviewed externally for ethical reasons—qualitative interview transcripts indicate the personal views of participants (cancer centre staff and patients), who might be identifiable in the original data.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Fischer FH, Lewith G, Witt CM, Linde K, von Ammon K, Cardini F, Falkenberg T, Fønnebø V, Johannessen H, Reiter B, Uehleke B, Weidenhammer W, Brinkhaus B (2014) High prevalence but limited evidence in complementary and alternative medicine: guidelines for future research. BMC Complement Altern Med 14(1):46–46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-14-46 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Paley CA et al (2012) Acupuncture for cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6Google Scholar
- 10.Dean-Clower E, Doherty-Gilman AM, Keshaviah A, Baker F, Kaw C, Weidong Lu, Manola J, Penson RT, Matulonis UA, Rosenthal DS (2010) Acupuncture as palliative therapy for physical symptoms and quality of life for advanced cancer patients. Integr Cancer Ther 9(2):158–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735409360666 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Shanahan C, de Lorimier R (2014) Targeted use of complementary medicines: potential health outcomes and cost savings in Australia. Frost & Sullivan (Australia) Pty. Ltd., Sydney, p 116Google Scholar
- 18.Furzer B et al (2014) Positive patient experiences in an Australian integrative oncology centre. BMC Complement Altern Med 14(158):1–8Google Scholar
- 21.Thorne S, Kirkham SR, MacDonald-Emes J (1997) Interpretive description: a noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Res Nurs Health 20(2):169–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199704)20:2<169::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-I PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Yardley L (2015) In: Smith JA (ed) Demonstrating validity in qualitative research, in qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. Sage, London, pp 235–251Google Scholar