Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1035–1041 | Cite as

Brief supportive-expressive group therapy for partners of men with early stage prostate cancer: lessons learned from a negative randomized controlled trial

  • Linda E. CarlsonEmail author
  • Codie R. Rouleau
  • Michael Speca
  • John Robinson
  • Barry D. Bultz
Commentary

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a negative randomized controlled trial, which piloted brief supportive-expressive therapy (SET) for partners of men with prostate cancer, and to discuss lessons learned for future clinical trials.

Methods

Partners of men with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic prostate cancer were randomized to SET (n = 45) or usual care (n = 32). SET involved six weekly group sessions emphasizing emotional expression, social support, and finding meaning in the cancer experience. Measures of mood disturbance, marital satisfaction, and social support were administered to both partners and patients at baseline, post-program, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences between SET and the control group for either patients or their wives on any outcome. Regardless of group membership, partners reported improvements in total mood disturbance (p = .011), tension (p < .001), anger (p = .041), confusion (p < .001), state anxiety (p = .001), and emotional support (p = .037), and patients reported improvements in tension (p = .003), emotional support (p = .047), positive interaction support (p = .004), and overall social support (p = .026).

Conclusions

Compared to the natural course of recovery, SET did not improve psychosocial outcomes for either men with prostate cancer or their wives. Methodological challenges experienced in implementing this trial yield valuable lessons for future research, including designing interventions relevant to unique problems faced by specific groups, being closely guided by previous research, and the potential utility of screening for distress as an inclusion criteria in intervention trials.

Keywords

Prostate cancer Oncology Partners Supportive expressive therapy Mood disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant through the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (formerly the National Cancer Institute of Canada, PI: B. Bultz). L. Carlson holds the Enbridge Research Chair in Psychosocial Oncology at the University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, co-funded by the Canadian Cancer Society Alberta/Northwest Territories Division and Alberta Cancer Foundation. C. Rouleau is supported by an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) Graduate Studentship and a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Doctoral Award. B. Bultz holds the Daniel Family Leadership Chair in Psychosocial Oncology. The sources of funding had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in writing the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Compliance with ethical standards

This study was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant through the Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute (formerly the National Cancer Institute of Canada, PI: B. Bultz).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Moser MT, Künzler A, Nussbeck F et al (2013) Higher emotional distress in female partners of cancer patients: prevalence and patient-partner interdependencies in a 3-year cohort. Psychooncology 22:2693–2701. doi: 10.1002/pon.3331 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN et al (2008) Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull 134:1–30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chambers SK, Schover L, Nielsen L et al (2013) Couple distress after localised prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer 21:2967–2976. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1868-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams KC, Hicks EM, Chang N et al (2014) Purposeful normalization when caring for husbands recovering from prostate cancer. Qual Health Res 24:306–316. doi: 10.1177/1049732314523842 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wootten AC, Abbott JM, Osborne D et al (2014) The impact of prostate cancer on partners: a qualitative exploration. Psychooncology 23:1252–1258. doi: 10.1002/pon.3552 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlson LE, Bultz BD, Speca M, St.Pierre M (2000) Partners of cancer patients: part II. Current psychosocial interventions and suggestions for improvement. J Psychosoc Oncol 18:33–43. doi: 10.1300/J077v18n03 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlson EL, Bultz DB, Speca M, Pierre SM (2000) Partners of cancer patients: part I. Impact, adjustment, and coping across the illness trajectory. J Psychosoc Oncol 18:39–63. doi: 10.1300/J077v18n02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US et al (1994) Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. The value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer 73:2791–2802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oberst M, James RH (1985) Going home: patient and spouse adjustment following cancer surgery. Top Clin Nurs 7:46–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allen SM (1994) Gender differences in spousal caregiving and unmet need for care. J Gerontol 49:S187–S195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blanchard CG, Toseland RW, McCallion P (1996) The effects of a problem-solving intervention with apouses of cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol 14:1–21. doi: 10.1300/J077v14n02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carter CA, Carter RE (1994) Some observations on individual and marital therapy with breast cancer patients and spouses. J Psychosoc Oncol 12(65–81):17p. doi: 10.1300/J077V12N01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bultz BD, Speca M, Brasher PM et al (2000) A randomized controlled trial of a brief psychoeducational support group for partners of early stage breast cancer patients. Psychooncology 9:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Pompe G, Duivenvoorden HJ, Antoni MH et al (1997) Effectiveness of a short-term group psychotherapy program on endocrine and immune function in breast cancer patients: an exploratory study. J Psychosom Res 42:453–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Brown L, Cross PA (1985) Psychosocial status of cancer patients and next of kin: normative data from the profile of mood states. J Psychosoc Oncol 3:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meinert CL (1986) Clinical trials: design, conduct and analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Classen C, Diamond S, Soleman A et al (1993) Brief supportive-expressive group therapy for women with primary breast cancer: a treatment manual. Psychosocial Treatment Manual, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spiegel D, Bloom JR, Kramer HC, Gottheil E (1989) Effect of psychosocial treatment on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Lancet 2:888–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spiegel D, Spira J (1991) Supportive-expressive group therapy: a treatment manual of psychosocial intervention for women with recurrent breast cancer. Psychosocial treatment laboratory, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spiegel D, Butler LD, Giese-Davis J et al (2007) Effects of supportive-expressive group therapy on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized prospective trial. Cancer 110:1130–1138. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22890 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Butler LD, Koopman C, Neri E et al (2009) Effects of supportive-expressive group therapy on pain in women with metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol 28:579–587. doi: 10.1037/a0016124 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Classen C, Butler L, Koopman C et al (2001) Supportive-expressive group therapy and distress in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized clinical intervention trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 58:494–501. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.5.494 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reuter K, Scholl I, Sillem M et al (2010) Implementation and benefits of psychooncological group interventions in German breast centers: a pilot study on supportive-expressive group therapy for women with primary breast cancer. Breast Care 5:91–96. doi: 10.1159/000297739 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McNair DA, Lorr M, Droppelman LF (1971) Profile of mood states. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San DiagoGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R et al (1983) State-trait anxiety inventory. Mind Garden, Redwood CityGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hudson WW (1990) Index of marital satisfaction. Walmyr Publishing Company, TempeGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sherbourne C, Stewart A (1991) The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 32:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Carlson LE, Doll R, Stephen J et al (2013) Randomized controlled trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy for distressed survivors of breast cancer (MINDSET). J Clin Oncol 31:3119–3126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carlson LE, Ottenbreit N, St Pierre M, Bultz BD (2001) Partner understanding of the breast and prostate cancer experience. Cancer Nurs 24:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Simard S, Savard J (2009) Fear of cancer recurrence inventory: development and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of fear of cancer recurrence. Support Care Cancer 17:241–251. doi: 10.1007/s00520-008-0444-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kirby RS (2015) Prostate cancer: lessons to be learned from breast cancer. Trends Urol Men’s Heal 6:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Regan T, Lambert SD, Kelly B (2013) Uptake and attrition in couple-based interventions for cancer: perspectives from the literature. Psychooncology 22:2639–2647. doi: 10.1002/pon.3342 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Robertson J, McNamee P, Molloy G et al (2016) Couple-based psychosexual support following prostate cancer surgery: results of a feasibility pilot randomized control trial. J Sex Med 13:1233–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lyons KS, Winters-Stone KM, Bennett JA, Beer TM (2015) The effects of partnered exercise on physical intimacy in couples coping with prostate cancer. Health Psychol 35:509–513. doi: 10.1037/hea0000287 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Couper J, Collins A, Bloch S et al (2015) Cognitive existential couple therapy (CECT) in men and partners facing localised prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int 115:35–45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12991 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lambert SD, McElduff P, Girgis A et al (2016) A pilot, multisite, randomized controlled trial of a self-directed coping skills training intervention for couples facing prostate cancer: accrual, retention, and data collection issues. Support Care Cancer 24:711–722. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2833-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Song L, Rini C, Deal AM et al (2015) Improving couples’ quality of life through a web-based prostate cancer education intervention. Oncol Nurs Forum 42:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Badr H, Krebs P (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology 22:1688–1704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Regan TW, Lambert SD, Girgis A et al (2012) Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer? A systematic review. BMC Cancer 12:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-279 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wootten AC, Abbott JM, Farrell A et al (2014) Psychosocial interventions to support partners of men with prostate cancer: a systematic and critical review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 8:472–484. doi: 10.1007/s11764-014-0361-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Carlson LE, Waller A, Groff SL et al (2013) What goes up does not always come down: patterns of distress, physical and psychosocial morbidity in people with cancer over a one year period. Psychooncology 22:168–176. doi: 10.1002/pon.2068 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda E. Carlson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Codie R. Rouleau
    • 2
  • Michael Speca
    • 1
    • 3
  • John Robinson
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Barry D. Bultz
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Division of Psychosocial Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer CentreCancer Control AlbertaCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations