Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1307–1316 | Cite as

Factors supporting cardiomyopathy screening among at-risk adult survivors of pediatric malignancies

  • Cheryl L. CoxEmail author
  • Liang Zhu
  • Rohit P. Ojha
  • Brenda D. Steen
  • Susan Ogg
  • Leslie L. Robison
  • Melissa M. Hudson
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Anthracyclines and chest irradiation place adult survivors of childhood cancer at risk of cardiomyopathy; many survivors do not obtain the recommended screening. Based on our recent clinical trial, the addition of telephone counseling to a printed survivorship care plan more than doubled survivors’ risk-based screening. Here, we sought to measure the impact of specific factors targeted in the intervention for their impact on survivors’ screening participation.

Methods

Study population—survivors participating in a randomized longitudinal intervention trial. Survivor questionnaires and medical records at baseline and 1-year follow-up provided the data. Within- and between-group differences in factors were assessed at baseline and follow-up; structural equation modeling (SEM) identified direct and indirect effects on screening participation.

Results

Of the 411 survivors, 55.3% were female, 89.3% white, 38.9% college graduates, and age 26–59 years (mean = 41 years, SD = 7.68 years). At follow-up, the counseling group demonstrated higher scores for intent to undergo screening (p < 0.001), adherence determination (p < 0.001), autonomous regulation (p < 0.001), competency (p = 0.03), perceived effort warranted for screening (p < 0.001), and perceived value of screening (p = 0.02). SEM identified four factors that directly influenced screening participation (n = 411, RMSEA = 0.02 [90% CI = 0.000–0.05]; CFI = 0.99; TLI = 0.99; WRMR = 0.63): the counseling intervention (p < 0.0001), intrinsic motivation (p < 0.0001), competency (p < 0.0001), and decisional control (p = 0.001); intrinsic motivation was also a mediator (p = 0.002) of screening participation.

Conclusions

Direct interpersonal interaction that focused on multiple modifiable, autonomy-supportive factors powerfully enhances the efficacy of a print survivorship care plan in increasing survivors’ screening participation. This finding challenges providers to reach beyond the disease treatment focus and embrace these strategies in their behavior change efforts.

Keywords

Cardiomyopathy Echocardiogram Survivors Pediatric cancer Late effects 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

NIH grants R01 NR011322 (CL Cox and MM Hudson, Co-PIs), CA55727 (GT Armstrong, PI), Cancer Center Support (CORE) grant (CA21765, C. Roberts, PI), and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The overall study was approved by the St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital Institutional Review Board and at each of the 27 participating institutions in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lipshultz SE, Adams MJ, Colan SD, Constine LS, Herman EH, Hsu DT, Hudson MM, Kremer LC, Landy DC, Miller TL, Oeffinger KC, Rosenthal DN, Sable CA, Sallan SE, Singh GK, Steinberger J, Cochran TR, Wilkinson JD, American Heart Association Congenital Heart Defects Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiolo (2013) Long-term cardiovascular toxicity in children, adolescents, and young adults who receive cancer therapy: pathophysiology, course, monitoring, management, prevention, and research directions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 128(19):e394. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182a88099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mulrooney DA, Yeazel MW, Kawashima T, Mertens AC, Mitby P, Stoval M, Donaldson SS, Green DM, Sklar CA, Robinson LL, Leisenring WM (2009) Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. BMJ 339:b4606. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4606 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Dalen EC, van der Pal HJ, Kok WE, Caron HN, Kremer LC (2006) Clinical heart failure in a cohort of children treated with anthracyclines: a long-term follow-up study. Eur J Cancer 42:3191–3198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Pal HJ, Van Dalen EC, Kremer LC, BP J, van Leeuwen FE (2005) Risk of morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease following radiotherapy for childhood cancer: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 31:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Armstrong GT, Kawashima T, Leisenring W, Stratton K, Stovall M, Hudson MM, Sklar CA, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC (2014) Aging and risk of severe, disabling, life-threatening, and fatal events in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 32:1218–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Armstrong GT, Liu Q, Yasui Y, Neglia JP, Leisenring W, Robison LL, Mertens AC (2009) Late mortality among 5-year survivors of childhood cancer: a summary from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 27:2328–2338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Armenian SH, Hudson MM, Mulder RL, Chen MH, Constine LS, Dwyer M, Nathan PC, Tissing WJE, Shankar S, Sieswerda E, Skinner R, Steinberger J, Van Dalen EC, Van der Pal HJ, Wallace WH, Levitt G, Kremer LC (2015) Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol 16:e123–e136. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70409-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2013) Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer: a national clinical guideline. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/132/index.html . Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  9. 9.
    United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group Late Effects Group (2005) Therapy based long term follow up practice statement. http://www.birminghamcancer.nhs.uk/uploads/document_file/document/4ea01eff358e980efb00006a/national_long_term_follow-up_guidelines_pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  10. 10.
    Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (2010) Richtlijn follow-up na kinderkanker (Directive follow-up after cancer in childhood: more than 5 years after diagnosis) Den Haag. https://www.skion.nl/workspace/uploads/richtlijn_follow-up_na_kinderkanker_deel_1.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  11. 11.
    Children’s Oncology Group (2008) Long-term follow-up guidelines for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers (version 3.0). http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org/pdf/ltfuguidelines.pdf. Accessed Feb 10 2016
  12. 12.
    Nathan PC, Greenberg ML, Ness KK, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Mahoney MC, Gurney JG, Donaldson SS, Leisenring W, Robison LL, Oeffinger KC (2008) Medical care in long-term survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26:4401–4409. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oeffinger KC, Hudson MM, Mertens AC, SS M, Mitby PA, Eshelman-Kent DA, Ford JS, Jones JK, Kamani S, Robison LL (2011) Increasing rates of breast cancer and cardiac surveillance among high-risk survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma following a mailed, one-page survivorship care plan. Pediatr Blood Cancer 56:818–824. doi: 10.1002/pbc.22696 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hudson MM, Leisenring W, Stratton K, Tinner N, Steen BD, Ogg S, Barnes L, Oeffinger KC, Robison LL, Cox CL (2014) Increasing cardiomyopathy screening in at-risk adult survivors of pediatric malignancies: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 10:3974–3791. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.3493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deci EL (1980) The psychology of self-determination. Lexington Books, Lexington, MAGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cox CL (1982) An interaction model of client health behavior: theoretical prescription for nursing. Adv Nurs Sci 5:41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cox CL (2003) Online exclusive: a model of health behavior to guide studies of childhood cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 30:E92–E99. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.E92-E99 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lazarus RS (1993) From psychological stress to the emotions: a history of changing outlooks. Annu Rev Psychol 4:1–22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cox CL, Hudson M, Mertens A, Oeffinger K, Whitton J, Montgomery M, Robison L (2009) Medical screening participation in the childhood cancer survivors. Arch Intern Med 169:454–462. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.588 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, Levesque C, Kouides RW, Ryan RM, Deci EL (2006) Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychol 25:91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schiller JS, Ward BW, Freeman G, Peregoy JA (2013) Early release of selected estimates based on data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/earlyrelease201306.pdf . Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  22. 22.
    DiMatteo MR, Hays RD, Gritz ER, Bastani R, Crane L, Elashoff R, Ganz P, Heber D, McCarthy W, Marcus A (1993) Patient adherence to cancer control regimens: scale development and initial validation. Psychol Assess 5(1):102. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.5.1.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Derogatis LR (1993) Brief symptom inventory (BSI), administration, scoring and procedure manual. National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Recklitis CJ, Rodriquez P (2007) Screening childhood cancer survivors with the brief symptom inventory-18: classification agreement with the symptom checklist-90-revised. Psycho-Oncology 16:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (2015). http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40. Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  26. 26.
    Wagner J (2005) Development of a questionnaire to measure heart disease risk knowledge in people with diabetes: the Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire. Patient Educ Couns 58:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (2008) Health care needs survey. http://www.stjude.org/SJFiles/ccss_healthneed.pdf . Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  28. 28.
    Nelson DE, Holtzman D, Bolen J, Stanwyck CA, Mack KA (2001) Reliability and validity of measures from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Soz Praventivmed 46(Suppl 1):S3–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Williams GC, Ryan RM, Deci EL (2008) Health-care, self-determination theory questionnaire packet. http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/health.html . Accessed 10 Feb 2016
  30. 30.
    Champion V, Skinner CS, Menon U (2005) Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. Res Nurs Health 28:329–336. doi: 10.1002/nur.20088 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983) A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24:385–396. doi: 10.2307/2136404 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM (2005) Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 43:436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Browne M, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JA (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–162Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bollen K (1990) Overall fit in covariance structure models: two types of sample size effects. Psychol Bull 107:256–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yu CY, Muthen BO (2002) Evaluation of model fit indices for latent variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. UCLA, Graduate School of Education and Information Studies, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krull KR, Brinkman TM, Li C, Armstrong GT, Ness KK, Srivastava DK, Gurney JG, Kimberg C, Krasin MJ, Pui CH, Robison LL, Hudson MM (2013) Neurocognitive outcomes decades after treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 31:4407–4415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Williams GC, Gagné M, Ryan RM, Deci EL (2002) Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychol 21:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Henderson TO, Hlubocky FJ, Wroblewski KE, Diller L, Daugherty CK (2010) Physician preferences and knowledge gaps regarding the care of childhood cancer survivors: a mailed survey of pediatric oncologists. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 28:878–883. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nathan PC, Daugherty CK, Wroblewski KE, Kigin ML, Stewart TV, Hlubocky FJ, Grunfeld E, Del Giudice ME, Oeffinger KC, Henderson TO (2013) Family physician preferences and knowledge gaps regarding the care of adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Cancer Surviv 7:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Suh E, Daugherty CK, Wroblewski KE, Lee H, Kigin ML, Rasinski KA, Ford JS, Tonorezos ES, Nathan PC, Oeffinger KC, Henderson TO (2014) General internists’ preferences and knowledge about the care of adult survivors of childhood cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Intern Med 160:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA, Forte KJ, Sweeney T, Hester AL, Darling J, Armstrong FD, Blatt J, Constine LS, Freedman ZR, Friedman DL, Green DM, Marina N, Meadows AT, Neglia JP, Oeffinger KC, Robison LL, Ruccione KS, Sklar CA, Hudson MM (2004) Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children’s Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22(24):4979–4990. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheryl L. Cox
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liang Zhu
    • 2
  • Rohit P. Ojha
    • 1
  • Brenda D. Steen
    • 3
  • Susan Ogg
    • 4
  • Leslie L. Robison
    • 1
  • Melissa M. Hudson
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Epidemiology and Cancer ControlSt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiostatisticsSt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  3. 3.Department of AnesthesiaSt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Nursing ResearchSt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA
  5. 5.Department of OncologySt. Jude Children’s Research HospitalMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations