Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 21, Issue 9, pp 2643–2649 | Cite as

Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients: what is known and what is needed

  • Jacqueline de LeeuwEmail author
  • Maria Larsson
Review Article

Abstract

Traditionally, cancer patient follow-up has focused on disease surveillance and detecting recurrence. However, an increasing number of patients who have survived cancer acknowledge the importance of cancer rehabilitation issues and the need for more patient-oriented models of care by reporting their unmet physical, emotional, and social needs. Nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients fulfills this need and has been developing gradually for various cancer diagnoses and prognoses. A growing body of evidence suggests that these services provide high-quality care that is both safe and efficient. Furthermore, patients benefit from the continuity of care and easy access to support for their multitude of needs, provided by such organized care. In this paper, we review the literature published in the past 5 years regarding nurse-led follow-up care for cancer patients in order to provide input and opinion for future research, clinical practice development, and nursing leadership. We pay special attention to head and neck cancer patients, a group that has been largely understudied and hence underreported in the literature. These patients have specific needs with respect to information and education regarding their cancer and potential treatment side-effects as well as a particular need for long-term psychosocial support and practical advice.

Keywords

Nurse-led care Follow-up Review Oncology 

References

  1. 1.
    Kjaer TK, Johansen C, Ibfelt E, Christensen J, Rottmann N, Hoybye MT, Ross L, Svendsen M, Dalton SO (2011) Impact of symptom burden on health related quality of life of cancer survivors in a Danish cancer rehabilitation program: a longitudinal study. Acta Oncol 50:223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Cancer Institute (2010) Follow-up care after cancer treatment. http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Therapy/followup. Accessed 12 May 2012.
  3. 3.
    American Cancer Society (2011) Global cancer facts & figures, 2nd edition. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies N, Batehup L (2011) Towards a personalised approach to aftercare: a review of cancer follow-up in the UK. J Cancer Surviv 5:142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gezondheidsraad (Dutch Health Council) (2007) Nacontrole in de oncologie (Follow-up in oncology). Gezondheidsraad, The Hague, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheldon H, Davis A, Parsons S (2009) Cancer follow up care. Picker Institute Europe, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rowland JH (2008) Cancer survivorship: rethinking the cancer control continuum. Semin Oncol Nurs 24:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, Chasen M, Earle CC, Friedman AJ, Green E, Jones GW, Jones JM, Parkinson M, Payeur N, Sabiston CM, Sinclair S (2012) Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. doi: 10.1007/s11764-012-0232-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS (2006) Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 24:5117–5124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kate W, Ziv A (2006) Patient choice in cancer follow-up. Eur J Oncol Nurs 10:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Cancer Policy Board (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilbert JE, Green E, Lankshear S, Hughes E, Burkoski V, Sawka C (2011) Nurses as patient navigators in cancer diagnosis: review, consultation and model design. Eur J Cancer Care 20:228–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loftus LA, Weston V (2001) The development of nurse-led clinics in cancer care. J Clin Nurs 10:215–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corner J (2003) The role of nurse-led care in cancer management. Lancet Oncol 4:631–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lewis R, Neal RD, Williams NH, France B, Wilkinson C, Hendry M, Russell D, Russell I, Hughes DA, Stuart NS, Weller D (2009) Nurse-led vs. conventional physician-led follow-up for patients with cancer: systematic review. J Adv Nurs 65:706–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beaver K, Latif S, Williamson S, Procter D, Sheridan J, Heath J, Susnerwala S, Luker K (2010) An exploratory study of the follow-up care needs of patients treated for colorectal cancer. J Clin Nurs 19:3291–3300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Offerman MPJ, Pruyn JFA (2009) Quality care criteria for patients with head and neck cancer. (Goede zorg voor mensen met kanker in het hoofd-halsgebied: kwaliteitscriteria gezien vanuit de patient). Patientenverenging NSvG en Stichting Klankbord. Utrecht: The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The National Cancer Alliance (2002) Head and neck cancers. Patient views and experiences. The National Cancer Alliance, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trinidade A, Kothari P, Andreou Z, Hewitt RJ, O'Flynn P (2012) Follow-up in head and neck cancer: patients’ perspective. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 25:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Anderson B (2010) The benefits to nurse-led telephone follow-up for prostate cancer. Br J Nurs 19:1085–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leahy M, Krishnasamy M, Herschtal A, Bressel M, Dryden T, Tai KH, Foroudi F (2012) Satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow up for low to intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy. A comparative study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shaida N, Jones C, Ravindranath N, Das T, Wilmott K, Jones A, Malone PR (2007) Patient satisfaction with nurse-led telephone consultation for the follow-up of patients with prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 10:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beaver K, Campbell M, Williamson S, Procter D, Sheridan J, Heath J, Susnerwala S (2012) An exploratory randomised controlled trial comparing telephone and hospital follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02936.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jefford M, Lotfi-Jam K, Baravelli C, Grogan S, Rogers M, Krishnasamy M, Pezaro C, Milne D, Aranda S, King D, Shaw B, Schofield P (2011) Development and pilot testing of a nurse-led posttreatment support package for bowel cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs 34:E1–E10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeyarajah S, Adams KJ, Higgins L, Ryan S, Leather AJ, Papagrigoriadis S (2011) Prospective evaluation of a colorectal cancer nurse follow-up clinic. Colorectal Dis 13:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Knowles G, Sherwood L, Dunlop MG, Dean G, Jodrell D, McLean C, Preston E (2007) Developing and piloting a nurse-led model of follow-up in the multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11:212–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McFarlane K, Dixon L, Wakeman CJ, Robertson GM, Eglinton TW, Frizelle FA (2012) The process and outcomes of a nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic. Colorectal Dis 14:e245–e249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Strand E, Nygren I, Bergkvist L, Smedh K (2011) Nurse or surgeon follow-up after rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 13:999–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cox A, Bull E, Cockle-Hearne J, Knibb W, Potter C, Faithfull S (2008) Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective. Eur J Oncol Nurs 12:412–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polinder S, Verschuur EM, Siersema PD, Kuipers EJ, Steyerberg EW (2009) Cost comparison study of two different follow-up protocols after surgery for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:2110–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Verschuur EM, Steyerberg EW, Tilanus HW, Polinder S, Essink-Bot ML, Tran KT, van der Gaast A, Stassen LP, Kuipers EJ, Siersema PD (2009) Nurse-led follow-up of patients after oesophageal or gastric cardia cancer surgery: a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 100:70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cruickshank S, Kennedy C, Lockhart K, Dosser I, Dallas L (2008) Specialist breast care nurses for supportive care of women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub2
  33. 33.
    Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Voogd AC, Falger P, Gijsen BC, Thuring M, Lenssen A, van der Ent F, Verkeyn J, Haekens C, Hupperets P, Nuytinck JK, van Riet Y, Brenninkmeijer SJ, Scheijmans LJ, Kessels A, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2011) Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT. Eur J Cancer 47:1175–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Voogd AC, Falger P, Gijsen BC, Thuring M, Lenssen A, van der Ent F, Verkeyn J, Haekens C, Hupperets P, Nuytinck JK, van Riet Y, Brenninkmeijer SJ, Scheijmans LJ, Kessels A, Lambin P, Boersma LJ (2011) Nurse-led telephone follow-up and an educational group programme after breast cancer treatment: results of a 2 × 2 randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sheppard C, Higgins B, Wise M, Yiangou C, Dubois D, Kilburn S (2009) Breast cancer follow up: a randomised controlled trial comparing point of need access versus routine 6-monthly clinical review. Eur J Oncol Nurs 13:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kagan SH (2009) The influence of nursing in head and neck cancer management. Curr Opin Oncol 21:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Larsson M, Hedelin B, Athlin E (2007) A supportive nursing care clinic: conceptions of patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    de Leeuw J, Prins JB, Teerenstra S, Merkx MA, Marres HA, van Achterberg T (2012) Nurse-led follow-up care for head and neck cancer patients: a quasi-experimental prospective trial. Support Care Cancer. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1553-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wells M, Donnan PT, Sharp L, Ackland C, Fletcher J, Dewar JA (2008) A study to evaluate nurse-led on-treatment review for patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. J Clin Nurs 17:1428–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wiederholt PA, Connor NP, Hartig GK, Harari PM (2007) Bridging gaps in multidisciplinary head and neck cancer care: nursing coordination and case management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:S88–S91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dutch Cancer Society Cancer Surveillance Committee (2011) The role of primary care for cancer patients during follow-up. KWF, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dutch Cancer Society Cancer Surveillance Committee (2010) The quality of cancer care in the Netherlands. KWF, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Guyatt GH, Ferrans CE, Halyard MY, Revicki DA, Symonds TL, Varricchio CG, Kotzeva A, Valderas JM, Alonso J (2007) Exploration of the value of health-related quality-of-life information from clinical research and into clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 82:1229–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cullum N, Spilsbury K, Richardson G (2005) Nurse led care. BMJ 330:682–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Farrell C, Molassiotis A, Beaver K, Heaven C (2011) Exploring the scope of oncology specialist nurses’ practice in the UK. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15:160–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morgan MA (2009) Cancer survivorship: history, quality-of-life issues, and the evolving multidisciplinary approach to implementation of cancer survivorship care plans. Oncol Nurs Forum 36:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck SurgeryRadboud University Nijmegen Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Health SciencesKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations