Advertisement

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 131, Issue 13–14, pp 329–336 | Cite as

Incidence, etiology, predictors and outcomes of suspected drug hypersensitivity reactions in a tertiary care university hospital’s emergency department

A retrospective study
  • Cvijeta Bielen
  • Luka Bielen
  • Robert LikićEmail author
original article
  • 92 Downloads

Summary

Background

Allergic drug reactions are adverse drug reactions that result from a specific immunologic response to a medication. Considering the epidemiological and clinical importance of drug allergy, this retrospective analysis focused on drug hypersensitivity in a tertiary care university hospital emergency department (ED).

Methods

In this study 74,929 ED records obtained from March 2012 to March 2015 were reviewed to determine the incidence, etiology, predictors and clinical features of drug hypersensitivity.

Results

The observed incidence of drug hypersensitivity was 0.87% of all ED admissions. It was significantly higher in female patients aged 18–29 years (2.26%; P < 0.0001) and during winter months (1.09%; P = 0.0058). Most patients had mild to moderate symptoms which regressed following ED treatment. Only five patients (7 per 100,000 ED visits) were diagnosed with drug-induced anaphylaxis, and only five patients were provisionally diagnosed with severe non-immediate reactions with systemic involvement. No patient died of drug hypersensitivity in the ED, and only a small proportion required subsequent hospitalization. The most common causes of drug hypersensitivity reactions were amoxicillin and paracetamol.

Conclusion

Drug hypersensitivity is a common reason for tertiary centre emergency admissions. This is the largest analysis of ED drug hypersensitivity admissions so far. Beta-lactams were identified as the leading cause of drug hypersensitivity requiring ED evaluation, which also explains the peak of drug hypersensitivity cases during winter months when the use of these medications is highest.

Keywords

Drug hypersensitivity Emergency department Beta-lactam antibiotics Anaphylaxis Serious non-immediate reactions with systemic involvement Adverse drug reaction Paracetamol 

Notes

Author contribution

CB wrote the article and performed data analysis, while LB and RL designed the study, performed data acquisition and critical review of the article.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ružica Jurakić-Tončić, a specialist in dermatology and allergology, for advice on making provisional diagnoses in patients with serious non-immediate reactions with systemic involvement. We thank Prof. Aleksandra Žmegač-Horvat, a professional proof reader in medical English, for revising the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

C. Bielen, L. Bielen, and R. Likić declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

508_2019_1499_MOESM1_ESM.docx (45 kb)
Table 1 Suspected medications for drug hypersensitivity reactions grouped by their therapeutic indications

References

  1. 1.
    Stone SF, Phillips EJ, Wiese MD, Heddle RJ, Brown SGA. Immediate-type hypersensitivity drug reactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moore N, Briffaut C, Noblet C, Normand CA, Thuillez C. Indirect drug-related costs. Lancet. 1995;345(8949):588–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279(15):1200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hohl CM, Nosyk B, Kuramoto L, Zed PJ, Brubacher JR, Abu-Laban RB, et al. Outcomes of emergency department patients presenting with adverse drug events. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(3):270–279.e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turner PJ, Gowland MH, Sharma V, Ierodiakonou D, Harper N, Garcez T, et al. Increase in anaphylaxis-related hospitalizations but no increase in fatalities: An analysis of United Kingdom national anaphylaxis data, 1992–2012. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):956–963.e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Drug allergy: Diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults, children and young people. 2014. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg183. Accessed 26 June 2015, NICE clinical guideline 183.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organisation (WHO). The use of the WHO-UMC system for standardised case causality assessment.. www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/safety_efficacy/WHOcausality_assessment.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology.. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. 2015. http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_publications/guidelines/. Accessed 9 Aug 2015.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mirakian R, Ewan PW, Durham SR, Youlten LJF, Dugué P, Friedmann PS, et al. BSACI guidelines for the management of drug allergy. Clin Exp. Allergy. 2009;39(1):43–61.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, et al. Anaphylaxis: Guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 2014;69(8):1026–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dworzynski K, Ardern-Jones M, Nasser S. Diagnosis and management of drug allergy in adults, children and young people: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g4852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moellman JJ, Bernstein JA, Lindsell C, Banerji A, Busse PJ, Camargo CA, et al. A consensus parameter for the evaluation and management of angioedema in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(4):469–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hitti EA, Zaitoun F, Harmouche E, Saliba M, Mufarrij A. Acute allergic reactions in the emergency department: Characteristics and management practices. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015;22(4):253–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moro Moro M, Tejedor Alonso MA, Esteban Hernández J, Múgica García MV, Rosado Ingelmo A, Vila Albelda C. Incidence of anaphylaxis and subtypes of anaphylaxis in a general hospital emergency department. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(2):142–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piromrat K, Chinratanapisit S, Trathong S. Anaphylaxis in an emergency department: A 2-year study in a tertiary-care hospital. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2008;26(2/3):121–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhopeshwarkar N, Sheikh A, Doan R, Topaz M, Bates DW, Blumenthal KG, et al. Drug-induced anaphylaxis documented in electronic health records. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wöhrl S. NSAID hypersensitivity—Recommendations for diagnostic work up and patient management. Allergo J Int. 2018;27(4):114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mawhirt SL, Fonacier LS, Calixte R, Davis-Lorton M, Aquino MR. Skin testing and drug challenge outcomes in antibiotic-allergic patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;118(1):73–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albin S, Agarwal S. Prevalence and characteristics of reported penicillin allergy in an urban outpatient adult population. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2014;35(6):489–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Birmingham LE, Cochran T, Frey JA, Stiffler KA, Wilber ST. Emergency department use and barriers to wellness: A survey of emergency department frequent users. BMC Emerg Med. 2016;17(1):16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gomes ER, Demoly P. Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;5(4):309–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gomes E, Cardoso MF, Praça F, Gomes L, Mariño E, Demoly P. Self-reported drug allergy in a general adult Portuguese population. Clin Exp Allergy. 2004;34(10):1597–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mirakian R, Leech SC, Krishna MT, Richter AG, Huber PAJ, Farooque S, et al. Management of allergy to penicillins and other beta-lactams. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(2):300–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Castells Guitart MC. Rapid drug desensitization for hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in the 21st century. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24(2):72–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hsu Blatman KS, Hepner DL. Current knowledge and management of hypersensitivity to perioperative drugs and radiocontrast media. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(3):587–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pfützner W, Brockow K. Perioperative drug reactions—Practical recommendations for allergy testing and patient management. Allergo J Int. 2018;27(4):126–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rubegni P, Cevenini G, Lamberti A, Bruni F, Tiezzi R, Verzuri A, et al. Dermatological conditions presenting at the Emergency Department in Siena University Hospital from 2006 to 2011. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(1):164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Blanquart F, Lehtinen S, Fraser C. An evolutionary model to predict the frequency of antibiotic resistance under seasonal antibiotic use, and an application to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc Biol Sci. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0679.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johansson SGO, Bieber T, Dahl R, Friedmann PS, Lanier BQ, Lockey RF, et al. Revised nomenclature for allergy for global use: Report of the Nomenclature Review Committee of the World Allergy Organization, October 2003. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):832–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IQVIA Zagreb d.o.o.ZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Internal Medicine, Intensive Care UnitUniversity Hospital Centre ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Internal Medicine, Unit of Clinical PharmacologyUniversity Hospital Centre ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  4. 4.School of MedicineUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations