Skip to main content
Log in

The MAINTAIN study—managing hemoglobin variability with darbepoetin alfa in dialysis patients experiencing a severe drop in hemoglobin

Die MAINTAIN Studie – Management von Hämoglobinschwankungen mit Darbepoetin alfa bei Dialysepatienten mit einem akuten Hämoglobinabfall

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Dialysis patients, receiving erythropoiesis stimulating agents, typically show signs of hemoglobin variability as a consequence of their dosing patterns, bleeding, infection, etc., which is commonly managed adjusting the dose regimen of the erythropoiesis stimulating agent. However, information on dosing strategies used in daily clinical practice and their outcomes in relation to hemoglobin variability is limited.

Objectives

To investigate clinical practice in Austria in relation with the management of hemoglobin variability, defined as a decrease of ³ 1 g/dL within 4 weeks from ³ 11 g/dL to £ 11 g/dL during maintenance therapy with darbepoetin alfa. The nature and incidence of clinical events related to the hemoglobin drop were also assessed.

Research design and methods

The MAINTAIN non-interventional study was conducted in hemodialysis patients, receiving darbepoetin alfa in accordance to the label approved in the European Union at that time. Patient data were documented retrospectively for the 3 months prior to the hemoglobin drop. Data for the 6 months post hemoglobin drop were collected retrospectively or prospectively, depending on the time of patient inclusion respective to the Hb drop.

Results

A hundred thirty six of 154 patients fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria and had prospective documentation of 6 months. The main causes for the hemoglobin drop included surgical and medical procedures (36.1 %), and infections or infestations (24.4 %). The median treatment period was 273 days. The mean hemoglobin drop was − 1.74 g/dL (95 % confidence interval (CI): − 1.60 to − 1.87). Consequently, 81 % of the patients had their dose of darbepoetin alfa increased within a median Kaplan–Meier time to dose increase of 12.5 days (95 % CI: 6–22). The geometric mean weekly darbepoetin alfa dose increased by a factor of 1.1 from 29.1 mg (95 % CI: 24.6–34.4) in the 3 months before hemoglobin drop to 32.4 (95 % CI: 27.2–38.6) in months 4–6 post hemoglobin drop. Three patients had red blood cell transfusions before hemoglobin drop and nine patients after hemoglobin drop. The mean hemoglobin increase was 0.43 g/dL (95 % CI: 0.24–0.62) from immediately prior to 2 weeks after dose increase. The median Kaplan–Meier time to achieve a hemoglobin ³ 11 g/dL after hemoglobin drop was 36 days (95 % CI: 32–45). Frequent darbepoetin alfa dose adjustments were necessary to sustain maintenance levels. No drug-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

This observational study describes physicians’ reactions to a drop in hemoglobin in clinical practice. Using darbepoetin alfa, the drop was generally compensated without leading to overcorrection.

Zusammenfassung

Grundlagen

Bei Dialysepatienten unter Erhaltungstherapie mit Erythropoese-stimulierenden Faktoren beobachtet man häufig Hämoglobinschwankung als Folge von Dosisanpassungen, Blutungen, Infektionen etc. Diesen Schwankungen kann am ehesten durch Dosisanpassung begegnet werden. Über Dosisstrategien in der klinischen Praxis und ihre Auswirkungen, ist bis dato wenig bekannt.

Studienziel

Es wurde die klinische Praxis in Österreich zur Handhabung eines akuten Hämoglobinabfalls von ³ 1 g/dl innerhalb von 4 Wochen von ³ 11 g/dl auf £ 11 g/dl unter Erhaltungstherapie mit Darbepoetin alfa untersucht. Weiters wurde die Art und Inzidenz der kausalen klinischen Ereignisse erfasst.

Studiendesign und Methodik

Die nicht-interventionelle MAINTAIN Studie wurde an Hämodialysepatienten durchgeführt, die Darbepoetin alfa nach der zum Zeitpunkt der Studie geltenden Zulassung der Europäischen Union erhielten. Die Patienten wurden retrospektiv über 3 Monate vor dem Hämoglobinabfall dokumentiert, sowie, je nach Zeitpunkt des Studieneinschlusses, retrospektiv oder prospektiv über 6 Monate danach.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt wurden 154 Patienten eingeschlossen, 136 erfüllten alle Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien und wurden prospektiv über 6 Monate dokumentiert. Die Hauptursachen für den Hämoglobinabfall waren chirurgische und medizinische Eingriffe (36,1 %), sowie Infektionen oder parasitäre Erkrankungen (24,4 %). Die mediane Behandlungsdauer war 273 Tage. Der mittlere Hämoglobinabfall betrug − 1,74 g/dl (95 % CI: − 1,60 bis − 1,87). Bei 81 % der Patienten wurde die Dosis erhöht. Die mediane Dauer bis zur Dosiserhöhung war 12,5 Tage (95 % CI: 6–22). Die geometrische mittlere Wochendosis stieg um einen Faktor 1,1 von 29,1 mg (95 % CI: 24,6–34,4) in den 3 Monaten vor auf 32,4 (95 % CI: 27,2–38,6) in den Monaten 4 bis 6 nach dem Hämoglobinabfall, 3 Patienten erhielten Blutkonserven davor und 9 Patienten danach. Der mittlere Hämoglobinanstieg von unmittelbar vor bis zwei Wochen nach Dosiserhöhung war 0,43 g/dl (95 % CI: 0,24–0,62). Die mediane Dauer bis zu einem Hämoglobin ³ 11 g/dl nach dem Hämoglobinabfall war 36 Tage (95 % CI: 32–45). Die Stabilisierung und Erhaltung des Hämoglobinwerts erforderte häufige Dosisanpassungen. Es wurden keine auf das Studienmedikament zurückzuführende unerwünschte Ereignisse berichtet.

Schlussfolgerungen

Diese Beobachtungsstudie beschreibt den Umgang mit einem Hämoglobinabfall in der klinischen Praxis. Dieser konnte mit Darbepoetin alfa meist ohne überschießende Reaktionen kompensiert werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Besarab A, Ayyoub F. Anemia in renal disease. 8th ed. Schrier RW, editor. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

  2. Egrie JC, Dwyer E, Browne JK, Hitz A, Lykos MA. Darbepoetin alfa has a longer circulating half-life and greater in vivo potency than recombinant human erythropoietin. Exp Hematol. 2003;31(4):290–9. (PubMed PMID: 12691916. Epub 2003/04/15. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2085–98. (PubMed PMID: 17108343. Epub 2006/11/17. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Drueke TB, Locatelli F, Clyne N, Eckardt KU, Macdougall IC, Tsakiris D, et al. Normalization of hemoglobin level in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(20):2071–84. (PubMed PMID: 17108342. Epub 2006/11/17. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pfeffer MA, Burdmann EA, Chen CY, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Eckardt KU, et al. A trial of darbepoetin alfa in type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(21):2019–32. (PubMed PMID: 19880844. Epub 2009/11/03. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Phrommintikul A, Haas SJ, Elsik M, Krum H. Mortality and target haemoglobin concentrations in anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietin: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;369(9559):381–8. (PubMed PMID: 17276778. Epub 2007/02/06. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK, Egrie JC, Nissenson AR, Okamoto DM, et al. The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(9):584–90. (PubMed PMID: 9718377. Epub 1998/08/27. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Epoetins and the risk of tumour growth progression and thromboembolic events in cancer patients and cardiovascular risks in patients with chronic kidney disease London. European Medicines Agency. 2007. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Public_statement/2009/11/WC500015604.pdf. Accessed: 25 Feb. 2011.

  9. Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa) label approved on 06/24/2011. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2011.

  10. Aranesp (Darbepoetin alfa) Summary of Product Characteristics. European Medicines Agency. 2011. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000332/WC500026149.pdf. Updated: 3 Feb. 2011.

  11. Berns JS, Elzein H, Lynn RI, Fishbane S, Meisels IS, Deoreo PB. Hemoglobin variability in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003;64(4):1514–21. (PubMed PMID: 12969173. Epub 2003/09/13. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishbane S, Berns JS. Evidence and implications of haemoglobin cycling in anaemia management. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22(8):2129–32. (PubMed PMID: 17595177. Epub 2007/06/28. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fishbane S, Berns JS. Hemoglobin cycling in hemodialysis patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. Kidney Int. 2005;68(3):1337–43. (PubMed PMID: 16105069. Epub 2005/08/18. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Lee GH, Miller JE, Streja E, Jing J, Robertson JA, et al. Predictors of hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53(5):823–34. (PubMed PMID: 2009187294.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Drueke T. Hyporesponsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(Suppl. 7):25–8. (PubMed PMID: 11590253. Epub 2001/10/09. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Macdougall IC, Cooper A. The inflammatory response and epoetin sensitivity. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17(Suppl. 1):48–52. (PubMed PMID: 2002069102.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Hoffken B, Wunsch H, Fink H, Kleiner M, Luft FC. Diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in renal failure patients during the post-erythropoietin era. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995;26(2):292–9. (PubMed PMID: 7645533. Epub 1995/08/01. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rao DS, Shih MS, Mohini R. Effect of serum parathyroid hormone and bone marrow fibrosis on the response to erythropoietin in uremia. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(3):171–5. (PubMed PMID: 8417383. Epub 1993/01/21. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berns JS. Should the target hemoglobin for patients with chronic kidney disease treated with erythropoietic replacement therapy be changed? Semin Dial. 2005;18(1):22–9. (PubMed PMID: 15663760. Epub 2005/01/25. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DeFrancisco AL, Macdougall IC, Carrera F, Braun J, Barany P, Bridges I, et al. Intercurrent events and comorbid conditions influence hemoglobin level variability in dialysis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2009;71(4):397–404. (PubMed PMID: 2009272859.)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collins AJ, Brenner RM, Ofman JJ, Chi EM, Stuccio-White N, Krishnan M, et al. Epoetin alfa use in patients with ESRD: an analysis of recent US prescribing patterns and hemoglobin outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46(3):481–8. (PubMed PMID: 16129210. Epub 2005/09/01. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Portoles JM, de Francisco AL, Gorriz JL, Martinez-Castelao A, Lopez-Gomez JM, Arias M, et al. Maintenance of target hemoglobin level in stable hemodialysis patients constitutes a theoretical task: a historical prospective study. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008(111):S82–7. (PubMed PMID: 19034334. Epub 2008/11/27. eng.)

  23. Pile T, McCafferty K, Byrne CJ, et al. The impact of type of erythropoiesis stimulating agent on hemoglobin variability in haemodialysis patients. Am Soc Nephrol. 2007. p. SU-PO546.

  24. Walker R, Pussell BA. Fluctuations in haemoglobin levels in haemodialysis, pre-dialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients receiving epoetin alpha or darbepoetin alpha. Nephrology (Carlton). 2009;14(7):689–95. (PubMed PMID: 2009528477.)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. West RM, Harris K, Gilthorpe MS, Tolman C, Will EJ. Functional data analysis applied to a randomized controlled clinical trial in hemodialysis patients describes the variability of patient responses in the control of renal anemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(8):2371–6. (PubMed PMID: 17625113. Epub 2007/07/13. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sulowicz W, Locatelli F, Ryckelynck JP, Balla J, Csiky B, Harris K, et al. Once-monthly subcutaneous C.E.R.A. maintains stable hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis and converted directly from epoetin one to three times weekly. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(4):637–46. (PubMed PMID: 17699476. Epub 2007/08/21. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ebben JP, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ. Hemoglobin level variability: associations with comorbidity, intercurrent events, and hospitalizations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(6):1205–10. (PubMed PMID: 17699349. Epub 2007/08/21. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eckardt KU, Kim J, Kronenberg F, Aljama P, Anker SD, Canaud B, et al. Hemoglobin variability does not predict mortality in European hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(10):1765–75. (PubMed PMID: 20798262. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3013534. Epub 2010/08/28. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. van der Putten K, van der Baan FH, Schellekens H, Gaillard CA. Hemoglobin variability in patients with chronic kidney disease in the Netherlands. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32(11):787–93. (PubMed PMID: 20020410. Epub 2009/12/19. eng.)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. 2008. http://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Accessed: 8 Apr. 2011.

  31. Tsirpanlis G. The pattern of inflammation and a potential new clinical meaning and usefulness of C-reactive protein in end-stage renal failure patients. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2005;28(1):55–61. (PubMed PMID: 15550763. Epub 2004/11/20. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. KDOQI, National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47(5 Suppl 3):S11–145. (PubMed PMID: 16678659. Epub 2006/05/09. eng.)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tsirpanlis G, Alevyzaki F, Triantafyllis G, Chatzipanagiotou S, Nicolaou C. C-reactive protein: "cutoff" point and clinical applicability. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005;46(2):368; author reply 9. (PubMed PMID: 16112061. Epub 2005/08/23. eng.)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lacson E, Jr, Ofsthun N, Lazarus JM. Effect of variability in anemia management on hemoglobin outcomes in ESRD. Am J Kid Dis. 2003;41(1):111–24. (PubMed PMID: 2003016294.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang W, Israni RK, Brunelli SM, Joffe MM, Fishbane S, Feldman HI. Hemoglobin variability and mortality in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(12):3164–70. (PubMed PMID: 18003781. Epub 2007/11/16. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gilbertson DT, Ebben JP, Foley RN, Weinhandl ED, Bradbury BD, Collins AJ. Hemoglobin level variability: associations with mortality. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3(1):133–8. (PubMed PMID: 18045862. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2390986. Epub 2007/11/30. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weinhandl ED, Peng Y, Gilbertson DT, Bradbury BD, Collins AJ. Hemoglobin variability and mortality: confounding by disease severity. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(2):255–65. (PubMed PMID: 20801571. Epub 2010/08/31. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pisoni RL, Bragg-Gresham JL, Fuller DS, Morgenstern H, Canaud B, Locatelli F, et al. Facility-level interpatient hemoglobin variability in hemodialysis centers participating in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): associations with mortality, patient characteristics, and facility practices. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(2):266–75. (PubMed PMID: 21251541. Epub 2011/01/22. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wish JB. Hemoglobin variability as a predictor of mortality: what’s a practitioner to do? Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(2):190–3. (PubMed PMID: 21251539. Epub 2011/01/22. eng.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2(4):299–310.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kramar R, Oberbauer R. Austrian Dialysis and Transplantation Registry (OEDTR), Annual Report. Austrian Society of Nephrology. 2009.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander R. Rosenkranz MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watschinger, B., Salmhofer, H., Horn, S. et al. The MAINTAIN study—managing hemoglobin variability with darbepoetin alfa in dialysis patients experiencing a severe drop in hemoglobin. Wien Klin Wochenschr 125, 71–82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-012-0311-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-012-0311-1

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation