e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik

, Volume 135, Issue 8, pp 602–608 | Cite as

Geomagnetically induced currents modelling and monitoring transformer neutral currents in Austria

  • Thomas HalbedlEmail author
  • H. Renner
  • G. Achleitner
CIGRE 2018


Transmission system operators are responsible for security and reliability of their grid. An important topic is the analysis of possible risks for the transmission system network.

The paper presents actual results about geomagnetically induced currents (GIC) in the Austrian transmission system. Because of problems with unexpected noise at some transformers, investigations were started, which gave an indication that DC could be the source of this noise. Due to the particular geological structure of the country, the influence of GIC in Austria is higher than for the most other countries in Central Europe. A simulation model to compute GIC was set up and compared to the measured DC transformer neutral current. The comparison of the simulated and measured currents shows a good correlation. High geomagnetic disturbances, which lead to high currents according the simulation model, can be confirmed by the measurement. Differences between measurement and simulation can be seen in the region of “fast” fluctuation within seconds. By detailed analysis of the times of occurrence it was shown, that currents from underground railway, which are operating with DC, flow through the transmission grid, too.


earth magnetic field geomagnetically induced current GIC solar storm transformer transmission grid underground system 


  1. 1.
    Albertson, V. D., Kappenman, J. G., Mohan, N., Skarbakka, G. A. (1981): Load-flow studies in the presence of geomagnetically-induced currents. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 2, 594–607. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pirjola, R. (1982): Electromagnetic induction in the Earth by a plane wave or by fields of line currents harmonic in time and space. In Geophysica (Vol. Vol. 20, Nos. 1–2, pp. 1–161). Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NERC (2012): Effects of geomagnetic disturbances on the bulk power system – interim report, NERC. Atlanta: North American Electric Reliability Corporation. Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dong, X., Liu, Y., Kappenman, J. G. (2001): Comparative analysis of exciting current harmonics and reactive power consumption from GIC saturated transformers (Vol. 1 pp. 318–322). Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walling, R. A., Khan, A. N. (1991): Characteristics of transformer exciting-current during geomagnetic disturbances. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 6(4), 1707–1714. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bachinger, F., et al. (2012): Direct current in transformers: effects and compensation. E&I, Elektrotech., 1–5. Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ETH Zürich and FEN Forschungsstelle Energienetze, Geomagnetically Induced currents in the Swiss transmission network, research centre for energy networks – ETH Zürich, Zurich. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kappenman, J. G. (1996): Geomagnetic storms and their impact on power systems. IEEE Power Eng. Rev., 16(5), 5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Albertson, V. D., Van Baelen, J. A. (1970): Electric and magnetic fields at the Earth’s surface due to auroral currents. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 4, 578–584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marti, L., Rezaei-Zare, A., Boteler, D. (2014): Calculation of induced electric field during a geomagnetic storm using recursive convolution. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv., 29(2), 802–807. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bailey, R. L., et al. (2017): Modelling geomagnetically induced currents in midlatitude Central Europe using a thin-sheet approach. Ann. Geophys., 35(3), 751–761. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ádám, A., Prácser, E., Wesztergom, V. (2012): Estimation of the electric resistivity distribution (EURHOM) in the European lithosphere in the frame of the eurisgic WP2 project. Acta Geod. Geophys. Hung., 47(4), 377–387. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ádám, A., Lemperger, I., Novák, A., Prácser, E., Szarka, L., Wesztergom, V. (2012): Geoelectric litosphere model of the continental Europe. MTA research centre for astronomy and Earth sciences Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boteler, D. H., Pirjola, R. J. (2014): Comparison of methods for modelling geomagnetically induced currents. Ann. Geophys., 32(9), 1177–1187. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halbedl, T., Renner, H., Sakulin, M., Achleitner, G. (2014): Measurement and analysis of neutral point currents in a 400-kV-network. In 2014 electric power quality and supply reliability conference (\(PQ\)) (pp. 65–68). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences. Online. Available: Accessed: 28-Jan-2016.
  17. 17.
    Pulkkinen, A., Bernabeu, E., Eichner, J., Beggan, C., Thomson, A. W. P. (2012): Generation of 100-year geomagnetically induced current scenarios: 100-YEAR SCENARIOS. Space Weather, 10(4), S04003. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demiray, T., Beccuti, G., Andersson, G. (2013): Risk assessment of the impact of geomagnetic disturbances on the transmission grid in Switzerland ( pp. 1–5). Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CIGRE - Reprint from with kind permission 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Electrical Power SystemsGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  2. 2.Graz University of TechnologyGrazAustria
  3. 3.Austrian Power Grid AGWienAustria

Personalised recommendations