Advertisement

An application of soft computing for the earth stress analysis in hydropower engineering

  • Shike ZhangEmail author
  • Yuan Yuan
  • Hongyuan Fang
  • Fuming Wang
Focus
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a soft computing of integrating artificial neural networks (ANNs) and genetic algorithms (GAs) to back analyze the earth stress field based on hydraulic fracturing. In this method, the ANN model is employed to map the relationship between the earth stress parameters and hydraulic fracturing behavior instead of numerical computation, and the advantage of this work is that it can conveniently conduct the integration of ANN and optimization algorithm and effectively reduce the workload of numerical computation by using directly the field-measured information to build learning samples. In addition, this can also improve accuracy of earth stress determination from field test data sets for ANN model. The GA is applied to implement multi-objective earth stress parameters optimization on the basis of the objective function. The field monitoring information in a practical project of hydropower engineering is used to verify the proposed soft computing in this study. Investigation results demonstrate that the proposed methodology is capable and valuable in addressing geomechanical parameters determination in hydropower engineering.

Keywords

Soft computing Earth stress identification Hydraulic fracturing Artificial neural network Genetic algorithm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. This study was supported by project funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51678536), Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (182300410160), Science and Technology Research Planning Project of Henan Province (182102310804, 182102310763), Training Project for Young Scholar of Institutions of High Education of Henan Province (2018GGJS122), Key Research Project of Institution of Higher Learning in Henan Province (20B560002) and Anyang Science and Technology Research Planning Project (Anke[2018]66).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aadnøy BS (1990) Inversion technique to determine the in–situ stress field from fracturing data. J Pet Sci Eng 4(2):127–141Google Scholar
  2. Aadnøy BS, Looyeh R (2011) Petroleum rock mechanics: drilling operations and well design. Gulf Professional Pub., OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Amadei B, Stephansson O (1997) Rock stress and its measurement. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Anaraki AK, Ayati M, Kazemi F (2019) Magnetic resonance imaging-based brain tumor grades classification and grading via convolutional neural networks and genetic algorithms. Biocybern Biomed Eng 39(1):63–74Google Scholar
  5. Bell JS (1996) Petro Geoscience 1. In situ stresses in sedimentary rocks (part 1): measurement techniques. Geosci Can 23:85–100Google Scholar
  6. Brown ET, Hoek E (1978) Trends in relationships between measured in situ stresses and depth. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(4):211–215Google Scholar
  7. Ebrahimzadeh A, Ghazalian R (2010) Modulation classification using genetic algorithm and radial basis neural network based on the HOS. In: 2010 6th international conference on digital content, multimedia technology and its applications (IDC), pp 375–378Google Scholar
  8. Fu X, Wang L (2001) Rule extraction by genetic algorithms based on a simplified RBF neural network. In: Proceedings of the 2001 congress on evolutionary computation, vols 1 and 2, pp 753–758Google Scholar
  9. Fu X, Wang L (2002) A GA-based RBF classifier with class-dependent features. In: CEC’02: proceedings of the 2002 congress on evolutionary computation, vols 1 and 2, pp 1890–1894Google Scholar
  10. Haimson BC, Fairhurst C (1967) Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks. SPE J 7(3):310–318Google Scholar
  11. Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang M, Wu A, Wang Y, Han B (2014) Geostress measurements near fault areas using borehole stress-relief method. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24(11):3660–3665Google Scholar
  13. Hubbert MK, Willis DG (1957) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Pet Trans AIME 210:153–168Google Scholar
  14. Ito T, Igarashi A, Kato H, Ito H, Sano O (2006) Crucial effect of system compliance on the maximum stress estimation in the hydro fracturing method: theoretical considerations and field-test verification. Earth Planets Space 58(2006):963–971Google Scholar
  15. Ito I, Funato A, Lin W et al (2013) Determination of stress state in deep subsea formation by combination of hydraulic fracturing in situ test and core analysis: a case study in the IODP expedition 319. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 118(3). Geophys Res Solid Earth 118(3):1203–1215Google Scholar
  16. Jafari-Marandi R, Smith BK (2017) Fluid genetic algorithm (FGA). J Comput Des Eng 4(2017):158–167Google Scholar
  17. Khademi F, Jamal SM, Deshpande N, Londle S (2016) Predicting strength of recycled aggregate concrete using artificial neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and multiple linear regression. Int J Sustain Built Environ 2016(5):355–369Google Scholar
  18. Lai J, Li D, Wang G, Xiao C, Hao X, Luo Q, Lai L, Qi Z (2019) Earth stress and reservoir quality evaluation in high and steep structure: the Lower Cretaceous in the Kuqa Depression, Tarim Basin, China. Mar Pet Geol 101:43–54Google Scholar
  19. Liu P, Ju Y, Ranjith PG, Zheng Z, Chen J (2016) Experimental investigation of the effects of heterogeneity and geostress difference on the 3D growth and distribution of hydrofracturing cracks in unconventional reservoir rocks. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35(A):541–554Google Scholar
  20. Ljunggren C, Chang Y, Janson T, Christiansson R (2003) An overview of rock stress measurement methods. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40(7–8):975–989Google Scholar
  21. Ngoc Q, Do T, Hussain FK (2013) A hybrid approach for the personalisable of cloud-based e-governance services. Int J High Perform Comput Netw 7(3):205–214Google Scholar
  22. Nicolson JPW, Hunt SP (2004) Distinct element analysis of borehole instability in fractured petroleum reservoir seal formation. In: SPE Asia and Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, society of petroleum engineering. Perth, Australia, pp 231–240Google Scholar
  23. Nikravesh M, Aminzadeh F, Zadeh LA (2003) Soft computing and intelligent data analysis in oil exploration. Elsevier, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Sangwan KS, Saxena S, Kant G (2015) Optimization of machining parameters to minimize surface roughness using integrated ANN-GA approach. Proc CIRP 29(2015):305–310Google Scholar
  25. Serpoush B, Khanian M, Shamsai A (2017) Hydropower plant site spotting using geographic information system and a MATLAB based algorithm. J Clean Prod 152(2017):7–16Google Scholar
  26. Tsukahara H, Ikeda R (1985) Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements and in situ stress field in the Kanta-Tokai area, Japan. Tectonophysics 135(4):329–345Google Scholar
  27. Wang J (2000) Several problems in application of hydraulic fracturing method to in-site 3D stress measurement. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 19(2):229–233Google Scholar
  28. Wang L, Fu X (2005) Data mining with computational intelligence. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang J, Li F (2015) Review of inverse optimal algorithm of in situ stress field and new achievement. J China Univ Min Technol 44(2):229–233Google Scholar
  30. Wu G (2009) Ground-stress testing result application of Huizhou Pumped storage power station. Resour Environ Eng 23(5):694–695Google Scholar
  31. Wu A, Wang J, Zhou Z, Huang S, Ding X, Dong Z, Zhang Y (2016) Engineering rock mechanics practices in the underground powerhouse at Jinping I hydropower station. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(2016):640–650Google Scholar
  32. Yang G, Qiao J, Bo Y (2011) Research on artificial neural networks with spatial architecture based on span connection and lateral inhibition mechanism. Int J Comput Sci Eng 6(1/2):86–95Google Scholar
  33. Yekta PV, Honar FJ, Fesharaki MN (2019) Modelling of hysteresis loop and magnetic behaviour of Fe-48Ni alloys using artificial neural network coupled with genetic algorithm. Comput Mater Sci 159:349–356Google Scholar
  34. Yin S, Towler BF, Dusseault MB, Rothenburg L (2010) Fully coupled THMC modeling of wellbore stability with thermal and solute convection considered. Transp Porous Media 84(3):773–798MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin S, Zhou W, Shan Y, Ding W, Xie R, Guo C (2017) Assessment of the geostress field of deep-thick gypsum cap rocks: a case study of Paleogene Formation in the south western Tarim Basin, NW China. J Pet Sci Eng 154(2017):76–90Google Scholar
  36. Zhang S, Yin S (2014) Determination of in situ stresses and elastic parameters from hydraulic fracturing tests by geomechanics modeling and soft computing. J Pet Sci Eng 124(2014):484–492Google Scholar
  37. Zhang L, Zhang D, Qiu D (2012) Application of radial basis function neural network to geostress field back analysis. Rock Soil Mech 33(3):799–804Google Scholar
  38. Zhang C, Liu N, Chu W (2016a) Key technologies and risk management of deep tunnel construction at Jinping II Hydropower station. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8(4):499–512Google Scholar
  39. Zhang S, Lv J, Yuan X, Yin S (2016b) BP Neural network with genetic algorithm optimization for prediction of geo-stress state from wellbore pressures. Int J Comput Intell Appl 15(3):1–16Google Scholar
  40. Zhang S, Niu X, Yin S, Ru Z (2016c) Estimation of earth stresses and fracture properties using numerical method and soft computing. Int J Comput Sci Eng 13(4):390–399Google Scholar
  41. Zhang S, Yin S, Wang F, Zhao B (2017) Characterization of in situ stress state and joint properties from extended leak-off tests in fractured shale gas reservoirs. Int J Geomech 3:1–12Google Scholar
  42. Zhang H, Yin S, Aadnoy BS (2018) Poroelastic modeling of borehole breakouts for in situ stress determination by finite element method. J Pet Sci Eng 162:674–684Google Scholar
  43. Zoback MD, Barton CA, Brudy M, Castillo DA, Finkbeiner T, Grollimund BR, Moos DB, Peska P, Ward CD, Wiprut DJ (2003) Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells. Int J Rcok Mech Min Sci 40(3):1049–1076Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureAnyang Normal UniversityAnyangChina
  2. 2.School of Water Conservancy and EnvironmentZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina

Personalised recommendations