Advertisement

5GAuNetS: an autonomous 5G network selection framework for Industry 4.0

  • Bhanu PriyaEmail author
  • Jyoteesh Malhotra
Methodologies and Application
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

The megatrends within the industrial automation and global value chains expedited the adoption of “Industry 4.0 enabled by 5G” to comprehend extremely flexible and smart production systems. The pivotal challenge for the smart manufacturing leveraging on 5G is the seamless vertical handover and connectivity to a suitable network in accordance with the determined application. The existing literature reports numerous strategies to ensure “always best connected” paradigm but they suffer from a couple of limitations. The amateurish approach employed in these strategies propelled the development of an autonomous network selection model exploiting fuzzy analytical hierarchical process consolidated with the novel extended efficacy coefficient method-based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. This article addresses the vertical handover execution under the circumstances of four typical 5G application scenarios, respectively, i.e. Tactile Internet, Bitpipe, Internet of Things and Internet Access for Regional Areas. The analytical results validated through the extensive simulation revealed that the proposed hybrid scheme is effective and efficient compared to other methods in terms of avoiding the unnecessary handover and the ranking abnormality issues.

Keywords

5G Industry 4.0 FAHP ECM-based TOPSIS Handover Ranking abnormality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Author would like to thank University Grant Commission, New Delhi for Junior Research Fellowship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alhabo M, Zhang L (2018) Multi-criteria handover using modified weighted TOPSIS methods for heterogeneous networks. IEEE Access 6:40547–40558Google Scholar
  2. Antonakoglou K, Xu X, Steinbach E, Mahmoodi T, Dohler M (2018) Towards haptic communications over the 5G tactile internet. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 20(4):3034–3059Google Scholar
  3. Barmpounakis S, Kaloxylos A, Spapis P, Alonistioti N (2017) Context-aware, user-driven, network-controlled RAT selection for 5G networks. Comput Netw 113:124–147Google Scholar
  4. Bedo JS, Strinati EC, Castellvi S et al (2015) White paper: 5G and the factories of the future. 5GPPP. https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/5G-PPP-White-Paper-on-Factories-of-the-Future-Vertical-Sector.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2018
  5. Bhatia M, Kumar K (2018) Network selection in cognitive radio enabled wireless body area networks. Digit Commun Netw.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2018.03.003 Google Scholar
  6. Bockelmann C, Pratas N, Nikopour H et al (2016) Massive machine-type communications in 5g: physical and MAC-layer solutions. IEEE Commun Mag 54(9):59–65Google Scholar
  7. Brown G (2016) Exploring 5G new radio: use cases. capabilities & timeline. Qualcomm https://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/files/heavy-reading-whitepaper-exploring-5g-new-radio-use-cases-capabilities-timeline.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2018
  8. Chen Q, Wang C, Wen P, Wang M, Zhao J (2018) Comprehensive performance evaluation of low-carbon modified asphalt based on efficacy coefficient method. J Clean Prod 203:633–644Google Scholar
  9. Cheng J, Chen W, Tao F, Lin CL (2018) Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing. J Ind Inf Integr 10:10–19Google Scholar
  10. Chou CC (2003) The canonical representation of multiplication operation on triangular fuzzy numbers. Comput Math Appl 45:1601–2610MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Feirer S, Sauter T (2017) Seamless handover in industrial WLAN using IEEE 802.11k. In: 2017 IEEE 26th international symposium on industrial electronics (ISIE), pp 1234–1239Google Scholar
  12. Frontoni E, Loncarski J, Pierdicca R, Bernardini M, Sasso M (2018) Cyber physical systems for Industry 4.0: towards real time virtual reality in smart manufacturing. In: Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics, pp 422–434Google Scholar
  13. Gundall M, Schneider J, Schotten HD et al (2018) 5G as enabler for Industrie 4.0 use cases: challenges and concepts. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), pp 1401–1408Google Scholar
  14. Habbal A, Goudar S, Hassan S (2017) Context-aware radio access technology selection approach in 5G ultra dense networks. IEEE Access 5:6636–6648Google Scholar
  15. Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Jahan A, Mustapha F, Sapuan SM, Ismail MY, Bahraminasab M (2011) A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:411–420Google Scholar
  17. Javanbarg MB, Scawthorn C, Kiyono J, Shahbodaghkhan B (2012) Fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria decision making systems using particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 39(1):960–966Google Scholar
  18. Kamvysi K, Gotzamani K, Andronikidis A, Georgiou AC (2014) Capturing and prioritizing students’ requirements for course design by embedding Fuzzy-AHP and linear programming in QFD. Eur J Oper Res 237(3):1083–1094Google Scholar
  19. Kang B, Wei D, Ya Li, Deng Y (2012) Decision making using Z-numbers under uncertain environment. J Comput Inf Syst 8(7):2807–2814Google Scholar
  20. Kasparick M, Wunder G, Jung P et al (2014) 5G waveform candidate selection. 5GNOW. 5GNOW deliverable D3.2Google Scholar
  21. Kumar K, Prakash A, Tripathi R (2017) Spectrum handoff scheme with multiple attributes decision making for optimal network selection in cognitive radio networks. Digi Commun Netw 3(3):164–175Google Scholar
  22. Lahby M, Cherkaoui L, Adib A (2013) An enhanced-TOPSIS based network selection technique for next generation wireless networks. In: ICT 2013, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  23. Li X, Li D, Wan J, Vasilakos AV, Lai C-F, Wang S (2015) A review of industrial wireless networks in the context of Industry 4.0. Wirel Netw 23(1):23–41Google Scholar
  24. Li D, Li X, Wan J (2017) A cloud-assisted handover optimization strategy for mobile nodes in industrial wireless networks. Comput Netw 128:133–141Google Scholar
  25. Li C, Li CP, Hosseini K et al (2019) 5G-based systems design for tactile internet. Proc IEEE 107(2):307–324Google Scholar
  26. Ludwig S, Karrenbauer M, Fellan A et al (2018) A 5G architecture for the factory of the future. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), pp 1409–1416Google Scholar
  27. Ma J, Yang D, Zhang H, Gidlund M (2017) A reliable handoff mechanism for mobile industrial wireless sensor networks. Sensors 17(8):1797Google Scholar
  28. Machan P, Wozniak J (2011) Proactive handover for IEEE 802.11r networks. In: 2011 4th joint IFIP wireless and mobile networking conference (WMNC 2011), pp 1–7Google Scholar
  29. Markaki O, Charilas D, Nikitopoulos D (2007) Enhancing quality of experience in next generation networks through network selection mechanisms. In: 2007 IEEE 18th international symposium on personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  30. Mikhailov L (2003) Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets Syst 134(3):365–385MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Mikhailov L, Tsvetinov P (2004) Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 5(1):23–33Google Scholar
  32. Osseiran A, Boccardi F, Braun V et al (2014) Scenarios for 5G mobile and wireless communications: the vision of the METIS project. IEEE Commun Mag 52(5):26–35Google Scholar
  33. Promentilla MAB, Furuichi T, Ishii K, Tanikawa N (2008) A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. J Environ Manag 88(3):479–495Google Scholar
  34. Rao SK, Prasad R (2018) Impact of 5G technologies on Industry 4.0. Wirel Pers Commun 100(1):145–159Google Scholar
  35. Sasirekha V, Chandrasekar C, Ilangkumaran M (2015) Heterogeneous wireless network vertical handoff decision using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making technique. Int J Comput Sci Eng 10(3):263–280Google Scholar
  36. Senouci MA, Mushtaq MS, Hoceini S, Mellouk A (2016a) TOPSIS-based dynamic approach for mobile network interface selection. Comput Netw 107:304–314Google Scholar
  37. Senouci MA, Hoceini S, Mellouk A (2016b) Utility function-based TOPSIS for network interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6Google Scholar
  38. Sgora A, Gizelis CA, Vergados DD (2011) Network selection in a WiMAX-WiFi environment. Pervasive Mob Comput 7(5):584–594Google Scholar
  39. Sheng-mei L, Su P, Ming-hai X (2010) An improved TOPSIS vertical handoff algorithm for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2010 IEEE 12th international conference on communication technology, pp 750–754Google Scholar
  40. Stevens-Navarro E, Wong VWS (2006) Comparison between vertical handoff decision algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2006 IEEE 63rd vehicular technology conference, pp 947–951Google Scholar
  41. Tang H, Fang NA (2018) A novel improvement on rank reversal in TOPSIS based on the efficacy coefficient method. Int J Internet Manuf Serv 5(1):67–84Google Scholar
  42. Tran PN, Boukhatem N (2008) Comparison of MADM decision algorithms for interface selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: 2008 16th international conference on software, telecommunications and computer networks, pp 119–124Google Scholar
  43. Vitturi S, Tramarin F, Seno L (2013) Industrial wireless networks: the significance of timeliness in communication systems. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 7(2):40–51Google Scholar
  44. Wang L, Kuo GGS (2013) Mathematical modeling for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks—a tutorial. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 15(1):271–292Google Scholar
  45. Wang YM, Luo Y (2009) On rank reversal in decision analysis. Math Comput Model 49(5–6):1221–1229MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186:735–747zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Zadeh LA (2011) A note on Z-numbers. Inf Sci 181(14):2923–2932MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang D, Zhang Y, Lv N, He Y (2013) An access selection algorithm based on GRA integrated with FAHP and entropy weight in hybrid wireless environment. In: 2013 7th International conference on application of information and communication technologies, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  49. Zhu KJ, Jing Y, Chang DY (1999) A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):450–456zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ECE DepartmentGNDU RCJalandharIndia

Personalised recommendations