Advertisement

Multiattribute decision making based on the binary connection number in set pair analysis under an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment

  • Qing Shen
  • Xu Huang
  • Yong Liu
  • Yunliang JiangEmail author
  • Keqin Zhao
Methodologies and Application
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

A new multiattribute decision-making (MADM) methodology based on set pair analysis (SPA) for an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment is developed in this paper. The connection number, which is known as a major component of SPA, provides a quantitative analysis to integrate the certainty and uncertainty as a combined system. First, we briefly review the concepts of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFS) and the binary connection number (BCN). Then, the transformation method of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers into BCNs is studied. Finally, we present a new MADM method where interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values are used to express evaluating values of alternatives on attributes, and weights are represented with real numbers or IVIFS. Some typical examples are presented to illustrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Multiattribute decision making Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets Set pair analysis Binary connection numbers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61771193, 61802123) and the Science and Technology Major Project of Zhejiang Province (2017C03047).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov KT, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31(3):343–349MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atanassov KT, Pasi G, Yager RR (2005) Intuitionistic fuzzy interpretations of multi-criteria multi-person and multi-measurement tool decision making. Int J Syst Sci 36(14):859–868MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao YX, Zhou H, Wang JQ (2018) An approach to interval-valued intuitionsitic stochastic multi-criteria decision-making using set pair analysis. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 9(4):629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaira T (2011) A novel intuitionistic fuzzy C means clustering algorithm and its application to medical images. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):1711–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen SM, Chiou CH (2015) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, PSO techniques and evidential reasoning methodology. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):1905–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen SM, Huang ZC (2017) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf Sci 381:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen TY, Li CH (2010) Determining objective weights with intuitionistic fuzzy entropy measures: a comparative analysis. Inf Sci 180(21):4207–4222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubois D, Pap E, Prade H (2000) Hybrid probabilistic-possibilistic mixtures and utility functions. In: Fodor J, De Baets B, Perny P (eds) Preferences and decisions under incomplete knowledge. Physica, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  10. Ejegwa PA, Modom ES (2015) Diagnosis of viral hepatitis using new distance measure of intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Fuzzy Math Arch 8(1):1–7Google Scholar
  11. Fan J, Jiang YL, Liu Y (2017) Quick attribute reduction with genealized indiscernibility models. Inf Sci 397–398:15–36Google Scholar
  12. Fu S, Zhou H (2017) Triangular fuzzy number multi-attribute decision-making method based on set-pair analysis. J Softw Eng 11(1):116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garg H (2016a) Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput Ind Eng 101:53–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garg H (2016b) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garg H (2017a) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:164–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garg H (2017b) A robust ranking method for intuitionistic multiplicative sets under crisp, interval environments and its applications. IEEE Trans Emerg Top Comput Intell 1(5):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garg H (2017c) Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multicriteria decision-making. Arab J Sci Eng 42(12):5275–5290MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garg H, Arora R (2018) Generalized and group-based generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets with applications in decision-making. Appl Intell 48(2):343–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garg H, Kumar K (2018a) Distance measure for connection number sets based on set pair analysis and its applications to decision-making process. Appl Intell 48:3346–3359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garg H, Kumar K (2018b) An advanced study on the similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the set pair analysis theory and their application in decision making. Soft Comput 22(15):4959–4970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta P, Mehlawant MK, Grover N, Pedrycz W (2018) Multi-attribute group decision making based on extended TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 69:554–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu JH, Yang L (2011) Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analysis. Syst Eng Procedia 1:432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recogn Lett 25:1603–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang YL, Xu CF, Yao Y. Zhao KQ (2004) Systems information in set pair analysis and its applications. In: Proceedings of 2004 international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 3, pp 1717–1722Google Scholar
  25. Kumar K, Garg H (2018a) TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput Appl Math 37:1319–1329MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar K, Garg H (2018b) Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Appl Intell 48:2112–2119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li DF (2010) TOPSIS-based nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 18(2):299–311Google Scholar
  28. Li DF, Cheng CT (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recogn Lett 23:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Y, Huang WL, Jiang YL, Zeng ZY (2014) Quick attribute reduct algorithm for neighborhood rough set model. Inf Sci 271:65–81MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nancy Garg H (2016) Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision making operators under frank norm operations and its application. Int J Uncertain Quantif 6(4):361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nayagam VLG, Jeevaraj S, Dhanasekaran P (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on non-hesitance score for interval-valued intuiitonistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 21(23):7077–7082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oztaysi B, Onar SC, Goztepe K, Kahrama C (2017) Evaluation of research proposals for grant funding using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput 21(5):1203–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pap E (2004) A generalization of the utility theory using a hybrid idempotent-probabilistic measure. J Syst Dialectr 12:261–274zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Park DG, Kwun YC, Park JH, Park IY (2009) Correlation coefficient of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application to multiple attribute group decision making problems. Math Comput Model 50(9–10):1279–1293MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shen Q, Jiang YL, Zhang XT, Fan J, Liu Y (2017) Method and applications for multiple attribute decision-making based on converting triangular fuzzy numbers into connection numbers. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10092, pp 281–292Google Scholar
  36. Wei CP, Wang P, Zhang YZ (2011) Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Inf Sci 181(19):4273–4286MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2010) Generalized point operators for aggregating intuitionistic fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst 25(11):1061–1080zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Xia MM, Xu ZS (2012) Entropy/cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Inf Fusion 13(1):31–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xie ZH, Zhang F, Cheng JT, Li L (2013) Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods based on improved set pair analysis. In: Proceedings of 2013 sixth international symposium on computational intelligence and design, vol 2, pp 386–389Google Scholar
  40. Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu ZS (2010) A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Inf Sci 180(1):181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Induced generalized intuiitonistic fuzzy operators. Knowl Based Syst 24(2):197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ye J (2009) Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making method based on a novel accuracy function under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 36:6899–6902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yue R, Wang ZB, Peng AH (2012) Multi-attribute group decision making based on set pair analysis. Int J Adv Comput Technol 4(10):205–213Google Scholar
  46. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang S (2008) Method for multiple attribute decision making with linguistic assessment information based on set pair analysis and intuitionistic fuzzy set. Sci Technol Rev 26(12):67–69Google Scholar
  48. Zhao KQ (1989) Set pair and set pair analysis—a new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the national conference on system theory and regional planning, Baotou, China, pp 87–91Google Scholar
  49. Zhao ZT, Zhang YJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making method in the frame of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Proceeding of the 2011 eighth international conference on fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. Shanghai, China, pp 192–196Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information EngineeringHuzhou UniversityHuzhouChina
  2. 2.Institute of Cyber-Systems and ControlZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
  3. 3.Institute of Connection mathematicsZhujiChina

Personalised recommendations