Advertisement

Ensemble classification from deep predictions with test data augmentation

  • Jorge Calvo-ZaragozaEmail author
  • Juan R. Rico-Juan
  • Antonio-Javier Gallego
Methodologies and Application
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Data augmentation has become a standard step to improve the predictive power and robustness of convolutional neural networks by means of the synthetic generation of new samples depicting different deformations. This step has been traditionally considered to improve the network at the training stage. In this work, however, we study the use of data augmentation at classification time. That is, the test sample is augmented, following the same procedure considered for training, and the decision is taken with an ensemble prediction over all these samples. We present comprehensive experimentation with several datasets and ensemble decisions, considering a rather generic data augmentation procedure. Our results show that performing this step is able to boost the original classification, even when the room for improvement is limited.

Keywords

Convolutional neural networks Data augmentation Ensemble classification 

Notes

Funding

First author thanks the support from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades through Juan de la Cierva-Formación Grant (Ref. FJCI-2016-27873).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Agrawal R (2008) Karmeshu: perturbation scheme for online learning of features: Incremental principal component analysis. Pattern Recognit 41(5):1452–1460CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed E, Jones M, Marks TK (2015) An improved deep learning architecture for person re-identification. In: The IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR)Google Scholar
  3. Aksakalli V, Malekipirbazari M (2016) Feature selection via binary simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation. Pattern Recognit Lett 75(Supplement C):41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bottou L (2010) Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In: Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010, Springer, pp. 177–186Google Scholar
  5. Burges CJC (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 2:121–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo-Zaragoza J, Oncina J (2014) Recognition of pen-based music notation: the HOMUS dataset. In: 22nd international conference on pattern recognition, ICPR 2014, Stockholm, Sweden, August 24–28, pp 3038–3043Google Scholar
  7. Cui X, Goel V, Kingsbury B (2015) Data augmentation for deep neural network acoustic modeling. IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Proc 23(9):1469–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Demsar J (2006) Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J Mach Learn Res 7:1–30MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Duchi JC, Hazan E, Singer Y (2011) Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J Mach Learn Res 12:2121–2159MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern recognition and scene analysis. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Glorot X, Bordes A, Bengio Y (2011) Deep sparse rectifier neural networks. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics, AISTATS 2011, Fort Lauderdale, USA, April 11–13, pp 315–323Google Scholar
  12. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Regularization for deep learning. In: Deep learning, chap 10, MIT Press, pp 228–273Google Scholar
  13. Ha TM, Bunke H (1997) Off-line, handwritten numeral recognition by perturbation method. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19(5):535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J (2015) Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. CoRR. arXiv:1502.01852
  15. Hull JJ (1994) A database for handwritten text recognition research. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 16:550–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jain AK, Mao J, Mohiuddin KM (1996) Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer 29(3):31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kittler J, Hatef M, Duin RPW, Matas J (1998) On combining classifiers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 20:226–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ko T, Peddinti V, Povey D, Khudanpur S (2015) Audio augmentation for speech recognition. In: 16th Annual conference of the international speech communication association, INTERSPEECH 2015, Dresden, Germany, September 6–10, pp 3586–3589Google Scholar
  19. Krizhevsky A, Hinton G (2009) Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. Technical report, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar
  20. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE (2012) Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: 26th Annual conference on neural information processing systems, pp 1106–1114Google Scholar
  21. Kuncheva LI (2004) Combining pattern classifiers: methods and algorithms. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Latecki LJ, Lakamper R, Eckhardt T (2000) Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour. In: Proceedings. IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, vol 1, IEEE, pp 424–429Google Scholar
  23. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P (1998) Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE 86(11):2278–2324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature 521(7553):436–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemley J, Bazrafkan S, Corcoran P (2017) Smart augmentation learning an optimal data augmentation strategy. IEEE Access 5:5858–5869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lv JJ, Cheng C, Tian GD, Zhou XD, Zhou X (2016) Landmark perturbation-based data augmentation for unconstrained face recognition. Signal Process Image Commun 47:465–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sermanet P, Eigen D, Zhang X, Mathieu M, Fergus R, LeCun Y (2013) Overfeat: integrated recognition, localization and detection using convolutional networks. CoRR. arXiv:1312.6229
  28. Simonyan K, Zisserman A (2014) Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. CoRR. arXiv:1409.1556
  29. Smith LN, Topin N (2016) Deep convolutional neural network design patterns. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.00847
  30. Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun Y, Wang X, Tang X (2013) Hybrid deep learning for face verification. In: The IEEE international conference on computer vision (ICCV)Google Scholar
  32. Sutskever I, Martens J, Dahl GE, Hinton GE (2013) On the importance of initialization and momentum in deep learning. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on machine learning, ICML 2013, Atlanta, GA, USA, 16–21 June 2013, pp 1139–1147Google Scholar
  33. Torralba A, Fergus R, Freeman WT (2008) 80 million tiny images: a large data set for nonparametric object and scene recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 30(11):1958–1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan L, Zeiler M, Zhang S, Cun YL, Fergus R (2013) Regularization of neural networks using dropconnect. In: Dasgupta S, Mcallester D (eds) JMLR workshop and conference proceedings, proceedings of the 30th international conference on machine learning (ICML-13), vol 28, pp 1058–1066Google Scholar
  35. Wilkinson RA, Geist J, Janet S, Grother PJ et al (1992) The first census optical character recognition system conference. Technical report, US Department of Commerce.  https://doi.org/10.18434/T4H01C
  36. Zeiler MD (2012) ADADELTA: an adaptive learning rate method. CoRR. arXiv:1212.5701
  37. Zheng WS, Lai J, Yuen PC, Li SZ (2009) Perturbation LDA: learning the difference between the class empirical mean and its expectation. Pattern Recognit 42(5):764–779CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software and Computing SystemsUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations