Advertisement

EPL models with fuzzy imperfect production system including carbon emission: a fuzzy differential equation approach

  • Manoranjan DeEmail author
  • Barun Das
  • Manoranjan Maiti
Methodologies and Application
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

The paper outlines the production policies for maximum profit of a firm producing imperfect economic lot size with time-dependent fuzzy defective rate under the respective country’s carbon emission rules. Generally in economic production lot-size models, defective production starts after the passage of some time from production commencement. So the starting time of producing defective units is normally uncertain and imprecise. Thus, produced defective units are fuzzy, partially reworked instantly and sold as fresh units. As a result, the inventory level at any time becomes fuzzy and the relation between the production, demand and inventory level becomes a fuzzy differential equation (FDE). Nowadays, different governments have made environmental regulations following the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to reduce carbon emission. Some governments use cape and trade policy on emission. Due to this, firms are in fix how to optimize the production. If the firms produce more, the profit increases along with more emission and corresponding tax. Here, models are formulated as profit maximization problems using FDE, and the corresponding inventory and environmental costs are calculated using fuzzy Riemann integration. An \(\alpha \)-cut of average profits is obtained and the reduced multi-objective crisp problems are solved using intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique. The models are illustrated numerically and results are presented graphically. Considering different carbon regulations, an algorithm for a firm management is presented to achieve the maximum profit. Real-life production problems for the firms in Annex I and developing countries are solved.

Keywords

Fuzzy imperfect production Carbon emission Fuzzy differential equation Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique 

Abbreviations

ACEC

Average carbon emission cost

ACER

Average carbon emission reward

ATP

Average total profit

CE

Carbon emission

CEC

Carbon emission cost

CER

Carbon emission reward

EOQ

Economic order quantity

EPL

Economic production lot size

EPQ

Economic production quantity

FDE

Fuzzy differential equation

FRI

Fuzzy Riemann integration

IFN

Intuitionistic fuzzy number

IFOT

Intuitionistic fuzzy optimization technique

IFS

Intuitionistic fuzzy set

MOOP

Multi-objective optimization problem

MOP

Multi-objective problem

TFN

Triangular fuzzy number

UPC

Unit production cost

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are greatly indebted to the referees for their valuable observations and suggestions for improving the presentation of the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Ahmadi MB, Kiani NA, Mikaeilvand N (2014) Laplace transform formula on fuzzy \(n\)th-order derivative and its application in fuzzy ordinary differential equations. Soft Comput 18(12):2461–2469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1224-x zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Allahviranloo T, Chehlabi M (2015) Solving fuzzy differential equations based on the length function properties. Soft Comput 19(2):307–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1254-4 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Allahviranloo T, Abbasbandy S, Behzadi SS (2014) Solving nonlinear fuzzy differential equations by using fuzzy variational iteration method. Soft Comput 18(11):2191–2200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-013-1193-5 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelov PP (1997) Optimization in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst 86(3):299–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00009-7 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Atanassov KT (2010) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets: theory and applications, 1st edn. Physica-Verlag GmbH, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Daya M (2002) The economic production lot-sizing problem with imperfect production processes and imperfect maintenance. Int J Prod Econ 76(3):257–264.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00168-2 Google Scholar
  8. Benjaafar S, Li Y, Daskin M (2013) Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: insights from simple models. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(1):99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304 Google Scholar
  9. Bouchery Y, Ghaffari A, Jemai Z, Dallery Y (2012) Including sustainability criteria into inventory models. Eur J Oper Res 222(2):229–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.004 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley JJ, Feuring T (1999) Introduction to fuzzy partial differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 105(2):241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00323-6 (Fuzzy analysis and related topics)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Chalco-Cano Y, Romn-Flores H (2009) Comparation between some approaches to solve fuzzy differential equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(11):1517–1527.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2008.10.002 (Theme: analysis)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen X, Benjaafar S, Elomri A (2013) The carbon-constrained EOQ. Oper Res Lett 41(2):172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.003 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiu YP (2003) Determining the optimal lot size for the finite production model with random defective rate, the rework process, and backlogging. Eng Optim 35(4):427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150310001597783 Google Scholar
  14. Das B, Maiti M (2012) A volume flexible fuzzy production inventory model under interactive and simulation approach. Int J Math Oper Res 4(4):422–438.  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMOR.2012.048903 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Das S, Dutta B, Guha D (2016) Weight computation of criteria in a decision-making problem by knowledge measure with intuitionistic fuzzy set and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set. Soft Comput 20(9):3421–3442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-015-1813-3 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Das A, Bera UK, Maiti M (2018) Defuzzification and application of trapezoidal type-2 fuzzy variables to green solid transportation problem. Soft Comput 22(7):2275–2297.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2491-0 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. De SK, Goswami A (2006) An eoq model with fuzzy inflation rate and fuzzy deterioration rate when a delay in payment is permissible. Int J Syst Sci 37(5):323–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720600681112 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Dey JK, Kar S, Maiti M (2005) An interactive method for inventory control with fuzzy lead-time and dynamic demand. Eur J Oper Res 167(2):381–397.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.07.025 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Du S, Zhu L, Liang L, Ma F (2013) Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the cap-and-trade system. Energy Policy 57:61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.042 Google Scholar
  20. Dubois D, Prade H (1988) Possibility theory. Springer, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Ezzati R, Maleknejad K, Khezerloo S, Khezerloo M (2015) Convergence, consistency and stability in fuzzy differential equations. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 12(3):95–112.  https://doi.org/10.22111/ijfs.2015.2021 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Gitinavard H, Ghaderi H, Pishvaee MS (2018) Green supplier evaluation in manufacturing systems: a novel interval-valued hesitant fuzzy group outranking approach. Soft Comput 22(19):6441–6460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2697-1 Google Scholar
  23. Guchhait P, Maiti MK, Maiti M (2013) A production inventory model with fuzzy production and demand using fuzzy differential equation: an interval compared genetic algorithm approach. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(2):766–778.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2012.10.017 Google Scholar
  24. Hayek PA, Salameh MK (2001) Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Prod Plan Control 12(6):584–590.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095372801750397707 Google Scholar
  25. He P, Zhang W, Xu X, Bian Y (2015) Production lot-sizing and carbon emissions under cap-and-trade and carbon tax regulations. J Clean Prod 103:241–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.102 (Carbon emissions reduction: policies, technologies, monitoring, assessment and modeling)Google Scholar
  26. Hu JS, Zheng H, Guo CY, Ji YP (2010) Optimal production run length with imperfect production processes and backorder in fuzzy random environment. Comput Ind Eng 59(1):9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.01.012 Google Scholar
  27. Hua G, Cheng T, Wang S (2011) Managing carbon footprints in inventory management. Int J Prod Econ 132(2):178–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.024 Google Scholar
  28. Jaber MY, Glock CH, Saadany AME (2013) Supply chain coordination with emissions reduction incentives. Int J Prod Res 51(1):69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.651656 Google Scholar
  29. Jana B, Roy TK (2007) Multi-objective intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming and its application in transportation model. Notes Intuit Fuzzy Sets 13(1):34–51Google Scholar
  30. Khouja M, Mehrez A (1994) An economic production lot size model with imperfect quality and variable production rate. J Oper Res Soc 45(12):1405–1417zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Lasdon LS, Waren AD, Jain A, Ratner M (1978) Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 4(1):34–50zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin TY (2010) An economic order quantity with imperfect quality and quantity discounts. Appl Math Model 34(10):3158–3165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.02.004 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu B, Iwamura K (1998) Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94(2):227–237MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Mandal M, Maiti M (2000) Inventory of damagable items with variable replenishment and stock-dependent demand. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 17(1):41zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Mandal S, Maity K, Mondal S, Maiti M (2010) Optimal production inventory policy for defective items with fuzzy time period. Appl Math Model 34(3):810–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2009.06.031 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Manna A, Das B, Dey J, Mondal S (2016) An EPQ model with promotional demand in random planning horizon: population varying genetic algorithm approach. J Intell Manuf 27(1):1–17Google Scholar
  37. Mizukoshi MT, Barros LC, Chalco-Cano Y, Román-Flores H, Bassanezi RC (2007) Fuzzy differential equations and the extension principle. Inf Sci 177(17):3627–3635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2007.02.039 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Mondal M, Maiti MK, Maiti M (2013) A production-recycling model with variable demand, demand-dependent fuzzy return rate: a fuzzy differential equation approach. Comput Ind Eng 64(1):318–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.10.014 Google Scholar
  39. Roy A, Kar S, Maiti M (2010) A volume flexible production-policy for randomly deteriorating item with trended demand and shortages. Int J Prod Econ 128(1):188–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.010 (Integrating the global supply chain)Google Scholar
  40. Sakawa M (1983) Interactive computer programs for fuzzy linear programming with multiple objectives. Int J Man Mach Stud 18(5):489–503zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Salameh M, Jaber M (2000) Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. Int J Prod Econ 64(1):59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00044-4 Google Scholar
  42. Sana SS (2010) An economic production lot size model in an imperfect production system. Eur J Oper Res 201(1):158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.027 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Song J, Leng M (2012) Analysis of the single-period problem under carbon emissions policies. Springer, New York, pp 297–313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3600-3_13 Google Scholar
  44. Taleizadeh AA, Kalantari SS, Cárdenas-Barrón LE (2016) Pricing and lot sizing for an epq inventory model with rework and multiple shipments. TOP 24(1):143–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-015-0377-9 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang X, Tang W (2009) Optimal production run length in deteriorating production processes with fuzzy elapsed time. Comput Ind Eng 56(4):1627–1632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.10.012 Google Scholar
  46. Wu HC (2000) The fuzzy riemann integral and its numerical integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst 110(1):1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00353-9 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Zadeh L (1999) Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 100:9–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)80004-9 Google Scholar
  49. Zhang B, Xu L (2013) Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. Int J Prod Econ 144(1):118–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024 Google Scholar
  50. Zhang C, Zhao R, Tang W (2009) Optimal run lengths in deteriorating production processes in random fuzzy environments. Comput Ind Eng 57(3):941–948.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.03.014 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics with Oceanology and Computer ProgrammingVidyasagar UniversityMidnaporeIndia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsSidho-Kanho-Birsha UniversityPuruliaIndia

Personalised recommendations