In 2015, Li and Chen proposed a multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) method, as similar as technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information to derive preference values (i.e., alternative ratings) based on individual differentiation of decision-makers. The individual differentiation consideration of decision-makers was useful because alternative ratings and criteria weights in group were generally derived by mean computation in the past. Additionally, MCGDM with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information is regarded to be the extension of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) with group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Practically, fuzzy extension of MCDM is commonly complicated based on the characteristics of fuzzy numbers, especially for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers that may be the most complex one for all kinds of fuzzy numbers. Obviously, Li and Chen’s contribution was extending MCGDM based on individual differentiation of decision-makers under trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Unfortunately, Li and Chen’s method merely expressed the importance difference of decision-makers for yielding preference values, but they derived criteria weights by mean computation. Therefore, the computations of preference values and criteria weights are inconsistent on considering the importance of decision-makers. Besides, their fuzzy extension was complicated and hard for MCGDM with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy information. To resolve the importance inconsistent of yielding ratings and weights as well as fuzzy operation complicated ties, we utilize trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and extended fuzzy preference relation for MCGDM based on individual differentiation of decision-makers in this paper. By utilization of extended fuzzy preference relation, both alternative ratings and criteria weights of MCGDM under intuitionistic fuzzy environment are yielded based on individual differentiation of decision-makers, and decision-making problems are easily and reasonably solved. Furthermore, we also use the simplified version of the MCGDM with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers to evaluate alternatives in the illustrating example of Li and Chen, and compare their evaluating result with the result of proposed method based on individual differentiation of decision-makers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research work was partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under Grant No. MOST 106-2410-H-346-002-.
This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under Grant No. MOST 106-2410-H-346-002-.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The corresponding author (also the sole author) declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Amin F, Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Ali A, Ahmed R, Ghani F (2017) Triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy aggregation operators and their application in group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 34:2401–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Amin F, Siddque N, Ali A (2017a) Aggregation operators on triangular cubic fuzzy numbers and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33:3323–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Amin F, Ali A (2018a) Weighted average rating (WAR) method for solving group decision making problem using triangular cubic fuzzy hybrid aggregation (Tcfha). Punjab Univ J Math 50:23–34MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Fahmi A, Abdullah S, Amin F, Ali A, Khan WA (2018b) Some geometric operators with triangular cubic linguistic hesitant fuzzy number and their application in group decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 35:2485–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang YJ (2015) A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on simple additive weighting method and relative preference relation. Appl Soft Comput 30:412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang CY, Chen SM (2017) Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf Sci 397–398:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar