Advertisement

An agent-based approach to power system dynamic state estimation through dual unscented Kalman filter and artificial neural network

  • Sassan GoleijaniEmail author
  • Mohammad Taghi Ameli
Methodologies and Application
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel approach to the power system dynamic state estimation by using the concepts of dynamic artificial neural networks and dual unscented Kalman filter. A dynamic artificial neural network is applied for developing a discrete-time state transition model of power system which is used for one-step-ahead prediction of the state vector. The model is also applicable for the generation of pseudo-measurements while it is needed. The dual unscented Kalman filter estimates the state vector of power system and calculates the weights of the dynamic artificial neural network simultaneously. A multi-agent-based model is utilized to structure the computational architecture of the proposed approach. The autonomous agents are designed to carry out the complex computations needed in the power system dynamic state estimation. The agents distribute multiple execution tasks among themselves, and they share information interactively. The agent-based modeling of the proposed method enhances the computing efficiency through decomposition of the computations among several autonomous agents. The effectiveness of the proposed method is examined through comprehensive simulations. The results guarantee the performance of the proposed approach as a practical solution for the power system dynamic state estimation.

Keywords

Artificial neural network Dynamic power system state estimation Machine learning Multi agent systems Unscented Kalman filter 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abur A, Exposito AG (2004) Power system state estimation: theory and implementation. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed NK, Atiya AF, Gayar NE, El-Shishiny H (2010) An empirical comparison of machine learning models for time series forecasting. Econ Rev 29:594–621MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aminifar F, Shahidehpour M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Kamalinia S (2014) Power system dynamic state estimation with synchronized phasor measurements. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 63:352–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai J, Ng S (2005) Tests for skewness, kurtosis, and normality for time series data. J Bus Econ Stat 23:49–60MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellifemine F et al (2002) Java agent development framework. TILAB Italia 10:2002Google Scholar
  6. Bi T, Qin X, Yang Q (2008) A novel hybrid state estimator for including synchronized phasor measurements. Electr Power Syst Res 78:1343–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blood E, Ilic M, Krogh BA (2006) Kalman filter approach to quasi-static state estimation in electric power systems. In: Power symposium, 2006. NAPS 2006. 38th North American, 2006. IEEE, pp 417–422Google Scholar
  8. Bretas N (1989) An iterative dynamic state estimation and bad data processing. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 11:70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buitrago J, Asfour S (2017) Short-term forecasting of electric loads using nonlinear autoregressive artificial neural networks with exogenous vector inputs. Energies 10:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caro E, Valverde G (2014) Impact of transformer correlations in state estimation using the unscented transformation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 29:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Systems 2:303–314MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Dabbagchi I, Christie R (1993) Power system test case archive (resources at electrical engineering). The University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  13. Debs AS, Larson RE (1970) A dynamic estimator for tracking the state of a power system. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 7:1670–1678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Do Coutto Filho MB, de Souza JCS (2009) Forecasting-aided state estimation—part I: panorama. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:1667–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Do Coutto Filho MB, de Souza JCS, Freund RS (2009) Forecasting-aided state estimation—part II: implementation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24:1678–1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Falcao DM, Wu FF, Murphy L (1995) Parallel and distributed state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10:724–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Funahashi K-I (1989) On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Netw 2:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghahremani E, Kamwa I (2011) Online state estimation of a synchronous generator using unscented Kalman filter from phasor measurements units. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 26:1099–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH (1996) Neural network design, vol 20. Pws Pub., BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Haykin SS (2001) Kalman filtering and neural networks. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Iiguni Y, Sakai H, Tokumaru H (1992) A real-time learning algorithm for a multilayered neural network based on the extended Kalman filter. IEEE Trans Signal Process 40:959–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK (1997) New extension of the Kalman filter to nonlinear systems. In: AeroSense’97, 1997. International society for optics and photonics, pp 182–193Google Scholar
  23. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK (2004) Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc IEEE 92:401–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Julier S, Uhlmann J, Durrant-Whyte HF (2000) A new method for the nonlinear transformation of means and covariances in filters and estimators. IEEE Trans Autom Control 45:477–482MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Kirincic V, Skok S, Terzija V (2015) A two-step hybrid power system state estimator. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 25:1158–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ko C-N, Lee C-M (2013) Short-term load forecasting using SVR (support vector regression)-based radial basis function neural network with dual extended Kalman filter. Energy 49:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Korres GN, Manousakis NM (2011) State estimation and bad data processing for systems including PMU and SCADA measurements. Electr Power Syst Res 81:1514–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandic DP, Chambers JA (2000) A normalised real time recurrent learning algorithm. Sig Process 80:1909–1916CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. McArthur SD, Davidson EM, Catterson VM, Dimeas AL, Hatziargyriou ND, Ponci F, Funabashi T (2007a) Multi-agent systems for power engineering applications—part I: concepts, approaches, and technical challenges. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22:1743–1752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McArthur SD, Davidson EM, Catterson VM, Dimeas AL, Hatziargyriou ND, Ponci F, Funabashi T (2007b) Multi-agent systems for power engineering applications—part II: technologies, standards, and tools for building multi-agent systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22:1753–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nishiya K, Hasegawa J, Koike T (1982) Dynamic state estimation including anomaly detection and identification for power systems. In: IEE proceedings C (generation, transmission and distribution), 1982. vol 5. IET, pp 192–198Google Scholar
  32. Nordman MM, Lehtonen M (2005) Distributed agent-based state estimation for electrical distribution networks. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:652–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pai A (2012) Energy function analysis for power system stability. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Qi J, Sun K, Wang J, Liu H (2016) Dynamic state estimation for multi-machine power system by unscented Kalman filter with enhanced numerical stability. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 9(2):1184–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanderson C, Curtin R (2016) Armadillo: a template-based C ++ library for linear algebra. J Open Source Softw.  https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00026
  36. Shahidehpour M, Wang Y (2004) Communication and control in electric power systems: applications of parallel and distributed processing. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  37. Sinha A, Mondal J (1999) Dynamic state estimator using ANN based bus load prediction. IEEE Trans Power Syst 14:1219–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SpA T (2001) Foundation for intelligent physical agentsGoogle Scholar
  39. Srivastava A, Ravikumar KG, Zweigle G (2011) Wide-area monitoring and control using the real time digital simulator and a synchrophasor vector processor. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 21:1521–1530Google Scholar
  40. Talebi HA, Abdollahi F, Patel RV, Khorasani K (2009) Neural network-based state estimation of nonlinear systems: application to fault detection and isolation, vol 395. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Tsekouras GJ, Kanellos FD, Mastorakis N (2015) Short term load forecasting in electric power systems with artificial neural networks. In: Mastorakis N, Bulucea A, Tsekouras G (eds) Computational problems in science and engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 343. Springer, Cham, pp 19–58Google Scholar
  42. Valverde G, Terzija V (2011) Unscented Kalman filter for power system dynamic state estimation. IET Gener Transm Distrib 5:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Volna E (2013) Introduction to soft computing (ISBN: 978-87-403-0391-9). https://Bookboon.com
  44. Wan EA, Van Der Merwe R (2000) The unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear estimation. In: Adaptive systems for signal processing, communications, and control symposium 2000. AS-SPCC. The IEEE 2000, 2000. IEEE, pp 153–158Google Scholar
  45. Wang S, Gao W, Meliopoulos AS (2012) An alternative method for power system dynamic state estimation based on unscented transform. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27:942–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wooldridge M (2009) An introduction to multiagent systems. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhan R, Wan J (2006) Neural network-aided adaptive unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation. IEEE Signal Process Lett 13:445–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhao J (2017) Power system dynamic state estimation considering measurement correlations. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 32:1630–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao J, Zhang G, La Scala M (2015) PMU based robust dynamic state estimation method for power systems. In: Power & energy society general meeting, 2015 IEEE, 2015. IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  50. Zhao J, Zhang G, Das K, Korres GN, Manousakis NM, Sinha AK, He Z (2016) Power system real-time monitoring by using PMU-based robust state estimation method. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 7:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations