Advertisement

A fuzzy entropy technique for dimensionality reduction in recommender systems using deep learning

  • B. SaravananEmail author
  • V. Mohanraj
  • J. Senthilkumar
Focus
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Recommenders utilize the knowledge discovery-based methods for identifying information required by the user. The recommender system faces some serious challenges in recent years to access exponentially increasing information due to high number of Web site users. Some of the challenges posed in this respect are: The system should assure high-quality recommendations and high coverage even during data sparsity and produce more recommendations per second based on million users. To improve the performance of the recommender system, selecting appropriate features from the available highly redundant information is a crucial task. The feature selection technique will bring down the dimensionality and also discard the redundant and the noise-corrupted features. The collaborative filtering-based methods will make use of the past activities or the preferences like the user ratings or content information of the products to regulate the top references. This work proposes a fuzzy entropy-based deep learning for the content features as well as a feature selection method. Deep learning-based recommender process takes extended important consideration by overwhelming difficulties of conventional models and attaining high reference excellence. A fuzzy entropy-based feature selection technique lowers the dimensionality of hyperspectral data.

Keywords

Recommender systems Collaborative filtering (CF) Deep learning and fuzzy entropy-based feature selection 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Betru BT, Onana CA, Batchakui B (2017) Deep learning methods on recommender system: a survey of state-of-the-art. Int J Comput Appl 162(10):17–22Google Scholar
  2. Bobadilla J, Ortega F, Hernando A, Gutiérrez A (2013) Recommender systems survey. Knowl Based Syst 46:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Q, Zhang G, Yang X, Li S, Li Y, Wang HH (2017) Single image shadow detection and removal based on feature fusion and multiple dictionary learning. Multimed Tools Appl 77(14):18601–18624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elahi M, Ricci F, Rubens N (2016) A survey of active learning in collaborative filtering recommender systems. Comput Sci Rev 20:29–50MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang W, Wang H, Zhang Y, Zhang S (2017) A novel cluster computing technique based on signal clustering and analytic hierarchy model using hadoop. Clust Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1205-9:1-8 Google Scholar
  6. Lee HM, Chen CM, Chen JM, Jou YL (2001) An efficient fuzzy classifier with feature selection based on fuzzy entropy. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 31(3):426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lu J, Wu D, Mao M, Wang W, Zhang G (2015) Recommender system application developments: a survey. Decis Support Syst 74:12–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nilashi M, bin Ibrahim O, Ithnin N (2014) Multi-criteria collaborative filtering with high accuracy using higher order singular value decomposition and neuro-fuzzy system. Knowl Based Syst 60:82–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pal M (2011) Fuzzy entropy based feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data. Dimensions and Directions of Geospatial Industry, pp 18–21Google Scholar
  10. Pal M, Foody GM (2010) Feature selection for classification of hyperspectral data by SVM. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 5:2297–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarwar B, Karypis G, Konstan J, Riedl J (2000) Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study (No. TR-00-043). Minnesota Univ Minneapolis Dept of Computer ScienceGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang H, Wang N, Yeung DY (2015) Collaborative deep learning for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, pp 1235–1244Google Scholar
  13. Yang X, Guo Y, Liu Y, Steck H (2014) A survey of collaborative filtering based social recommender systems. Comput Commun 41:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang S, Wang H, Huang W (2017) Two-stage plant species recognition by local mean clustering and Weighted sparse representation classification. Clust Comput 20(2):1517–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang S, Wang H, Huang W, You Z (2018) Plant diseased leaf segmentation and recognition by fusion of superpixel, K-means and PHOG. Optik-Int J Light Electron Optics 157:866–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zheng L (2016) A survey and critique of deep learning on recommender systems. Technical Report, University of Illinois, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  17. Zou Q, Ni L, Zhang T, Wang Q (2015) Deep learning based feature selection for remote sensing scene classification. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 12(11):2321–2325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sona College of TechnologySalemIndia

Personalised recommendations