Study on centroid type-reduction of general type-2 fuzzy logic systems with weighted Nie–Tan algorithms
- 59 Downloads
In recent years, researching on general type-2 fuzzy logic systems (GT2 FLSs) has become a hot topic as the development of alpha-planes representation of general type-2 fuzzy sets. The iterative Karnik–Mendel (KM) algorithms are used to perform the key block of type-reduction (TR) of GT2 FLSs. However, the KM algorithms are computationally intensive and time-consuming, which is not adapted to real-time applications. In the enhanced types of algorithms, the noniterative Nie–Tan (NT) algorithms decrease the computational cost greatly. Moreover, the closed-form Nie–Tan algorithms which calculate the outputs by averaging the lower and upper bounds of the membership functions have been proved to be actually an accurate algorithm for performing TR. The paper expands the NT algorithms to three different forms of weighted NT (WNT) algorithms according to the Newton–Cotes quadrature formulas of numerical integration techniques. Four computer simulation examples are adopted to analyze the performances of WNT algorithms when solving the type-reduction of general type-2 fuzzy logic systems. The proposed WNT algorithms have smaller absolute errors and faster convergence speed compared with NT algorithms, which provide the potential value for designers and adopters of GT2 FLSs.
KeywordsGeneral type-2 fuzzy logic systems Type-reduction Nie–Tan algorithms Weighted Nie–Tan algorithms Computer simulation
This paper is partially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61773188, No. 61803189), Liaoning Province Natural Science Foundation Guidance Project (No. 20180550056) and Fundamental Research Funds for Liaoning's Universities (No. JL201615410). The author is very obliged to Professor Jerry Mendel, who has offered the author some important suggestions.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict exists. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Castillo O, Melin P (2008) Intelligent systems with interval type-2 fuzzy logic. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 4(4):771–783Google Scholar
- Chen Y, Wang DZ, Ning W (2015) Studies on centroid type-reduction algorithms for general type-2 fuzzy logic systems. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 11(6):1987–2000Google Scholar
- Mathews JH, Fink KD (2004) Numerical Methods Using Matlab. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
- Mendel JM, Wu HW (2007a) Type-2 fuzzistics for symmetric interval type-2 fuzzy sets: Part 1, forward problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 14(6):360–377Google Scholar
- Nie M, Tan WW (2008) Towards an efficient type-reduction method for interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 1425–1432Google Scholar
- Wagner C, Hagras H (2013) Slices based general type-2 fuzzy sets and systems, in advances in type-2 fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. In: Sadeghian A, Mendel JM, Tahayori H (eds) Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Wang T, Chen Y, Tong SC (2008) Fuzzy reasoning models and algorithms on type-2 fuzzy sets. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 4(10):2451–2460Google Scholar
- Wu DR, Nie M (2011) Comparison and practical implementations of type reduction algorithms for type-2 fuzzy sets and systems. In: IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, pp 2131–3138Google Scholar