Hesitant fuzzy set (HFS) takes several possible values as the membership degree of an element to a set to express the decision makers’ hesitance when making decisions. Since its appearance, the HFS has been widely used in many fields, such as decision making, clustering analysis. Lukasiewicz implication operator, an indispensable part of implication operators, can grasp more nuances compared with the others. In this paper, we shall combine the Lukasiewicz implication operator with HFSs to realize a direct clustering analysis algorithm and a novel alternative sorting method in decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment. To do that, we first apply the Lukasiewicz implication operator to deal with HFEs by getting a hesitant fuzzy Lukasiewicz implication operator, and then construct a hesitant fuzzy triangle product and a hesitant fuzzy square product based on the new implication operator. After that, the hesitant fuzzy square product is applied to define the similarity degree between HFSs, and based on which, we develop a direct clustering algorithm for hesitant fuzzy information. Meanwhile, the hesitant fuzzy triangle product is used to induce a new alternative sorting method. Finally, two numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness and practicability of our method and algorithm, one of which involves the evaluation analysis of the Arctic development risk.
Hesitant fuzzy set Lukasiewicz implication operator Clustering analysis Hesitant fuzzy square product Alternative sorting
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Ananthi VP, Balasubramaniam P, Kalaiselvi T (2016) A new fuzzy clustering algorithm for the segmentation of brain tumor. Soft Comput 20:4859–4879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong Y, Zhang H, Herrera-Viedma E (2016) Integrating experts’ weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors. Decis Support Syst 84:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubois D, Prade H (1980) Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications. Academic Press, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
Kohout LJ, Bander W (1980) Fuzzy relation product as a tool for analysis and synthesis of the behavior of complex natural and artificial systems. In: Wang SK, Chang PP (eds) Fuzzy sets: theory and application to policy analysis an information systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 341–367Google Scholar
Kohout LJ, Bander W (1984) Automatic documentary information retrieval by means of fuzzy relation products. TMS/Stud Manag Sci 20:343–383Google Scholar
Liao HC, Xu ZS (2014) Subtraction and division operations over hesitant fuzzy sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27:65–72MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
Meng FY, An QX (2017) A new approach for group decision making method with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 127:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar