A neutrosophic cubic set (NCS) consists of both an interval neutrosophic set and a single-valued neutrosophic set. Hence, NCSs are very suitable for expressing the hybrid information of both the interval neutrosophic set (related to the uncertain part of the information) and the single-valued neutrosophic set (related to the certain part) simultaneously. However, there is little research on operations and applications of NCNs in existing literature. First, therefore, this paper proposes the operations of neutrosophic cubic numbers (NCNs), which are basic elements in NCSs. Second, we define the score, accuracy, and certainty functions, along with a ranking method for NCNs. Third, we develop a neutrosophic cubic number weighted arithmetic averaging (NCNWAA) operator and a neutrosophic cubic number weighted geometric averaging (NCNWGA) operator in order to aggregate NCN information and indicate their properties. Then, a multiple attribute decision-making method based on the NCNWAA or NCNWGA operator and the ranking method of NCNs is established under a NCN environment. Finally, an illustrative example about the selection problem of investment alternatives is provided in order to demonstrate the application and feasibility of the developed approach.
Neutrosophic cubic set Neutrosophic cubic number Ranking method Neutrosophic cubic number weighted arithmetic averaging (NCNWAA) operator Neutrosophic cubic number weighted geometric averaging (NCNWGA) operator Multiple attribute decision-making
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71471172).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that I have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Ali M, Deli I, Smarandache F (2016) The theory of neutrosophic cubic sets and their applications in pattern recognition. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:1957–1963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun YB, Smarandache F, Kim CS (2017) Neutrosophic cubic sets. New Math Nat Comput 13(01):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu PD (2016) The aggregation operators based on Archimedean t-conorm and t-norm for the single valued neutrosophic numbers and their application to decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 18(5):849–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu PD, Tang GL (2016) Some power generalized aggregation operators based on the interval neutrosophic numbers and their application to decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30:2517–2528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu PD, Wang YM (2014) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25(7–8):2001–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu PD, Wang YM (2016) Interval neutrosophic prioritized OWA operator and its application to multiple attribute decision making. J Syst Sci Complex 29(3):681–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu PD, Chu YC, Li YW, Chen YB (2014) Some generalized neutrosophic number Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 16(2):242–255Google Scholar
Mondal K, Pramanik S (2015) Neutrosophic tangent similarity measure and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 9:85–92Google Scholar
Pramanik S, Biswas P, Giri BC (2017a) Hybrid vector similarity measures and their applications to multi-attribute decision making under neutrosophic environment. Neural Comput Appl 28(5):1163–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pramanik S, Dalapati S, Alam S, Roy TK, Smarandache F (2017b) Neutrosophic cubic MCGDM method based on similarity measure. Neutrosophic Sets Syst 16:44–56Google Scholar
Şahin R (2017) Cross-entropy measure on interval neutrosophic sets and its applications in multicriteria decision making. Neural Comput Appl 28(5):1177–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin R, Küçük A (2015) Subsethood measure for single valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(2):525–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin R, Liu PD (2016) Maximizing deviation method for neutrosophic multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Neural Comput Appl 27(7):2017–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şahin R, Liu PD (2017) Possibility-induced simplified neutrosophic aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria group decision making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(4):769–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smarandache F (1998) Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set, and logic. American Research Press, RehobothzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2005) Interval neutrosophic sets and logic: theory and applications in computin\(g\). Hexis, PhoenixzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Wang H, Smarandache F, Zhang YQ, Sunderraman R (2010) Single valued neutrosophic sets. Multispace Multistruct 4:410–413zbMATHGoogle Scholar
Ye J (2013) Multicriteria decision-making method using the correlation coefficient under single-valued neutrosophic environment. Int J Gen Syst 42(4):386–394MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye J (2014a) A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:2459–2466MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
Ye J (2014b) Similarity measures between interval neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria decision-making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26:165–172zbMATHGoogle Scholar
Ye J (2014c) Single valued neutrosophic minimum spanning tree and its clustering method. J Intell Syst 23(3):311–324Google Scholar
Ye J (2014d) Clustering methods using distance-based similarity measures of single-valued neutrosophic sets. J Intell Syst 23(4):379–389Google Scholar
Ye J (2015) Improved cosine similarity measures of simplified neutrosophic sets for medical diagnoses. Artif Intell Med 63(3):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye J (2017) Single valued neutrosophic similarity measures based on cotangent function and their application in the fault diagnosis of steam turbine. Soft Comput 21(3):817–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ye J, Fu J (2016) Multi-period medical diagnosis method using a single valued neutrosophic similarity measure based on tangent function. Computer Methods Programs Biomed 123:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar