Soft Computing

, Volume 22, Issue 22, pp 7505–7517 | Cite as

Involutive equality algebras

  • R. A. Borzooei
  • M. Zarean
  • O. ZahiriEmail author


The present paper aims to study a special class of equality algebras, called involutive equality algebra. We obtain some properties of this structure and prove that every linearly ordered 0-compatible equality algebra includes a \((\sim _0)\)-involutive subalgebra. We prove that each \((\sim _0)\)-involutive equality algebra is a lattice, while it is distributive under a suitable condition. Then, we define \((\sim _0)\)-involutive deductive systems on bounded equality algebras and represent a condition under which the set of all dense elements of an equality algebra is a \((\sim _0)\)-involutive deductive system. Finally, we find the relations among 0-compatible equality algebras, residuated lattices and Boolean algebras.


Equality algebra Involutive equality algebra Residuated lattice Boolean algebra 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03G25 06F05 06F35 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.


  1. Boicescu V, Filipoiu A, Georgescu G, Rudeanu S (1991) Lukasiewicz-Moisil algebras, Annals of Discrete Mathematics, vol 49. Elsevier, North HollandzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Borzooei RA, Zebardasta F, Aaly Kologani M (2017) Some types of filters in equality algebras. Categ Gen Algebr Struct Appl 7:33–55MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Busneag D (1993) Hertz algebras of fractions and maximal Hertz algebra of quotients. Math Jpn 39:461–469MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Ciungu LC (2014) On pseudo-equality algebras. Arch Math Log 53:561–570MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ciungu LC (2015) Internal states on equality algebras. Soft Comput 19:939–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciungu LC (2017) Commutative pseudo equality algebras. Soft Comput 21:4601–4616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dvurečenskij A, Zahiri O (2016) Pseudo equality algebras: revision. Soft Comput 20(6):2091–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jenei S (2012) Equality algebras. Stud Log 100:1201–1209MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jenei S, Kóródi L (2013) Pseudo-equality algebras. Arch Math Log 52:469–481MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muresan C (2010) Dense elements and classes of residuated lattices. Bull Math Soc Sci Math Roum Nouv Ser 53(101)(1):11–24MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Novák V (2007) EQ-Algebras in progress. In: Castillo O, Melin P, Ross OM, Sepúlveda Cruz R, Pedrycz W, Kacprzyk J (eds) Theoretical advances and applications of fuzzy logic and soft computing. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 42. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  12. Novák V, De Baets B (2009) EQ-algebras. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160:2956–2978MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rachůnek J, Šalounová D (2017) Ideals and involutive filters in generalizations of fuzzy structures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 311:70–85MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ward M, Dilworth RP (1939) Residuated Lattices. Trans Am Math Soc 45:335–354MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zarean M, Borzooei RA, Zahiri O (2017) On state equality algebras. Quasigr Relat Syst 25(2):211–220MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Zebardasta F, Borzooei RA, Aaly M (2017) Kologani Results on equality algebras. Inf Sci 381:270–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsPayame Noor UniversityTehranIran
  3. 3.University of Applied Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations