Advertisement

International Journal of Biometeorology

, Volume 63, Issue 10, pp 1405–1415 | Cite as

Establishment of validated models for non-invasive prediction of rectal temperature of sows using infrared thermography and chemometrics

  • Yao-Ze FengEmail author
  • Hai-Tao Zhao
  • Gui-Feng Jia
  • Chijioke Ojukwu
  • He-Qun Tan
Original Paper
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

Rectal temperature is an important physiological indicator used to characterize the reproductive and health status of sows. Infrared thermography, a surface temperature measurement technology, was investigated in this study to explore its feasibility in non-invasive detection of rectal temperature in sows. A total of 124 records of rectal temperature and surface temperature in various body regions of 99 Landrace × Yorkshire crossbred sows were collected. These surface temperatures together with ambient temperature, ambient humidity, and wind speed in pig pens were correlated with the real rectal temperature of sows to establish rectal temperature prediction models by introducing chemometrics algorithms. Two types of models, i.e., full feature models and selected feature models, were established by applying the partial least squares regression (PLSR) method. The optimal model was attained when 7 important features were selected by LARS-Lasso, where correlation coefficients and root mean squared errors of calibration were 0.80 and 0.30 °C, respectively. Particularly, the validity and stability of established simplified models were further evaluated by applying the model to an independent prediction set, where correlation coefficients and root mean squared errors for prediction were 0.80 and 0.35 °C, respectively. The validation of established models is scarce in previous similar studies. Above all, this study demonstrated that introduction of chemometrics methodologies would lead to more reliable and accurate model for predicting sow rectal temperature, thus the potential for ensuring animal welfare in a broader view if extended to more applications.

Keywords

Sows Rectal temperature Surface temperature Infrared thermography Partial least squares regression Chemometrics 

Notes

Funding information

The authors would like to thank the financial supports from the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD0500700) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2018CFB099).

References

  1. Banhazi TM, Lehr H, Black JL, Crabtree H, Schofield P, Tscharke M, Berckmans D (2012) Precision livestock farming: an international review of scientific and commercial aspects. Int J Agric Biol Eng 5:1–9Google Scholar
  2. Brown-Brandl TM, Eigenberg RA, Purswell JL (2013) Using thermal imaging as a method of investigating thermal thresholds in finishing pigs. Biosyst Eng 114:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung T, Jung W, Nam E, Kim J, Park S, Hwang C (2010) Comparison of rectal and infrared thermometry for obtaining body temperature of gnotobiotic piglets in conventional portable germ free facility. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 23:1364–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diego ACPD, Sánchez-Cordón PJ, Pedrera M, Martínez-López B, Gómez-Villamandos JC, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM (2013) The use of infrared thermography as a non-invasive method for fever detection in sheep infected with bluetongue virus. Vet J 198:182–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R (2004) Least angle regression. Ann Stat 32:407–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng YZ, Sun DW (2013) Near-infrared hyperspectral imaging in tandem with partial least squares regression and genetic algorithm for non-destructive determination and visualization of Pseudomonas loads in chicken fillets. Talanta 109:74–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng YZ, Elmasry G, Sun DW, Scannell AG, Walsh D, Morcy N (2013) Near-infrared hyperspectral imaging and partial least squares regression for rapid and reagentless determination of Enterobacteriaceae on chicken fillets. Food Chem 138:1829–1836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furniss SJ (1987) Measurement of rectal temperature to predict ‘mastitis, metritis and alagactia’ (MMA) in sows after farrowing. Prev Vet Med 5:133–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(87)90018-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvão RK, Araujo MC, José GE, Pontes MJ, Silva EC, Saldanha TC (2005) A method for calibration and validation subset partitioning. Talanta 67:736–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. George WD, Godfrey RW, Ketring RC, Vinson MC, Willard ST (2014) Relationship among eye and muzzle temperatures measured using digital infrared thermal imaging and vaginal and rectal temperatures in hair sheep and cattle. J Anim Sci 92:4949–4955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hardy JD, Soderstrom GF (1938) Heat loss from the nude body and peripheral blood flow at temperature of 22°C to 35°C. J Nutr 16:493–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hine L, Laven RA, Sahu SK (2015) An analysis of the effect of thermometer type and make on rectal temperature measurements of cattle, horses and sheep. N Z Vet J 63:171–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen BN, Jensen FS, Madsen SN, Løssl K (2000) Accuracy of digital tympanic, oral, axillary, and rectal thermometers compared with standard rectal mercury thermometers. Eur J Surg 166:848–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kammersgaard TS, Malmkvist J, Pedersen LJ (2013) Infrared thermography--a non-invasive tool to evaluate thermal status of neonatal pigs based on surface temperature. Animal 7:2026–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kantardzic M (2004) Data mining: concepts, models, methods and algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Loughmiller JA, Spire MF, Dritz SS, Fenwick BW, Hosni MH, Hogge SB (2001) Relationship between mean body surface temperature measured by use of infrared thermography and ambient temperature in clinically normal pigs and pigs inoculated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Am J Vet Res 62:676–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lucy MC, Safranski TJ (2017) Heat stress in pregnant sows: thermal responses and subsequent performance of sows and their offspring. Mol Reprod Dev 84:946–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malmkvist J, Pedersen LJ, Kammersgaard TS, Jørgensen E (2012) Influence of thermal environment on sows around farrowing and during the lactation period. J Anim Sci 90:3186–3199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marai IFM, EI-Darawany AA, Fadiel A, Abdel-Hafez MAM (2007) Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep—a review. Small Rumin Res 71:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qin YX, Wang YL, Gao XF, Shi-Rong MI, Qiu XT, Zhang Q, Ding XD (2016) Temperature changes during estrus in swine was studied by infrared temperature measurement device. Chin J Anim Vet Sci 47(1):85–91Google Scholar
  21. Roberto J, Souza B (2014) Use of infrared thermography in veterinary medicine and animal production. J Anim Behav Biometeorol 2(3):73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sathiyabarathi M, Jeyakumar S, Manimaran A, Jayaprakash G, Pushpadass HA, Sivaram M, Ramesha KP, Das DN, Kataktalware MA, Prakash MA, Kumar RD (2016) Infrared thermography: a potential noninvasive tool to monitor udder health status in dairy cows. Vet World 9:1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sellier N, Guettier E, Staub C (2014) A review of methods to measure animal body temperature in precision farming. Am J Agric Sci Technol 2:74–99Google Scholar
  24. Siewert C, Dänicke S, Kersten S, Brosig B, Rohweder D, Beyerbach M, Seifert H (2014) Difference method for analysing infrared images in pigs with elevated body temperatures. Z Med Phys 24:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soerensen DD, Pedersen LJ (2015) Infrared skin temperature measurements for monitoring health in pigs: a review. Acta Vet Scand 57:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stiehler T, Heuwieser W, Pfützner A, Voigtsberger R, Burfeind O (2013) Repeatability of measurements of the rectal temperature and comparison of vaginal and rectal temperature in puerperal sows. Tierarztl Prax Ausg G Grosstiere Nutztiere 41:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Svante W, Michael S, Lennart E (2001) PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 58:109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tibshirani R (2011) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc 73:267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Traulsen I, Naunin K, Müller K, Krieter J (2010) Application of infrared thermography to measure body temperature of sows. Züchtungskunde 82:437–446Google Scholar
  30. Vicente-Pérez R, Avendaño-Reyes L, Mejía-Vázquez Á, Álvarez-Valenzuela FD, Correa-Calderón A, Mellado M, Meza-Herrera CA, Guerra-Liera JE, Robinson PH, Macías-Cruz U (2016) Prediction of rectal temperature using non-invasive physiologic variable measurements in hair pregnant ewes subjected to natural conditions of heat stress. J Therm Biol 55:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warriss PD, Pope SJ, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ, Knowles TG (2006) Estimating the body temperature of groups of pigs by thermal imaging. Vet Rec 158:331–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wathes CM, Kristensen HH, Aerts JM, Berckmans D (2008) Is precision livestock farming an engineer’s daydream or nightmare, an animal’s friend or foe, and a farmer’s panacea or pitfall? Comput Electron Agric 64:2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu J, Yin P, Liu F, Cheng G, Guo K, Lu A, Zhu X, Luan W, Xu J (2010) Effect of heat stress on the porcine small intestine: a morphological and gene expression study. Comp Biochem Physiol A 156:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EngineeringHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Agricultural Equipment in Mid-lower Yangtze RiverMinistry of Agriculture and Rural AffairsWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations