Later springs green-up faster: the relation between onset and completion of green-up in deciduous forests of North America
In deciduous forests, spring leaf phenology controls the onset of numerous ecosystem functions. While most studies have focused on a single annual spring event, such as budburst, ecosystem functions like photosynthesis and transpiration increase gradually after budburst, as leaves grow to their mature size. Here, we examine the “velocity of green-up,” or duration between budburst and leaf maturity, in deciduous forest ecosystems of eastern North America. We use a diverse data set that includes 301 site-years of phenocam data across a range of sites, as well as 22 years of direct ground observations of individual trees and 3 years of fine-scale high-frequency aerial photography, both from Harvard Forest. We find a significant association between later start of spring and faster green-up: − 0.47 ± 0.04 (slope ± 1 SE) days change in length of green-up for every day later start of spring within phenocam sites, − 0.31 ± 0.06 days/day for trees under direct observation, and − 1.61 ± 0.08 days/day spatially across fine-scale landscape units. To explore the climatic drivers of spring leaf development, we fit degree-day models to the observational data from Harvard Forest. We find that the default phenology parameters of the ecosystem model PnET make biased predictions of leaf initiation (39 days early) and maturity (13 days late) for red oak, while the optimized model has biases of 1 day or less. Springtime productivity predictions using optimized parameters are closer to results driven by observational data (within 1%) than those of the default parameterization (17% difference). Our study advances empirical understanding of the link between early and late spring phenophases and demonstrates that accurately modeling these transitions is important for simulating seasonal variation in ecosystem productivity.
KeywordsPhenology Green-up Forest productivity Ecosystem model North America
SK was supported by NASA Headquarters under the NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship Program – Grant 14-EARTH14R-23. KH received support from the French National Research Agency (ANR) in the frame of the Investments for the future Programme, within the Cluster of Excellence COTE (ANR-10-LABX-45). ADR acknowledges support for the PhenoCam network from the National Science Foundation, through the Macrosystems Biology program (EF-1065029 and EF-1702697). Additional support was received from the National Science Foundation under the Harvard Forest Long-Term Ecological Research Program (DEB-1237491) and the Harvard Center for Geographic Analysis. We thank John O’Keefe of Harvard Forest for his insightful discussions of this research.
- Keenan TF, Gray J, Friedl MA, Toomey M, Bohrer G, Hollinger DY, Munger JW, O’Keefe J, Schmid HP, Wing IS, Yang B, Richardson AD (2014) Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nat Clim Chang 4:598–604. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klosterman S, Richardson AD (2017b) Landscape phenology from unmanned aerial vehicle photography at Harvard Forest since 2013. Harvard Forest data archive: HF294. http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu:8080/exist/apps/datasets/showData.html?id=hf294. Accessed 1 Dec 2017
- Klosterman ST, Hufkens K, Gray JM, Melaas E, Sonnentag O, Lavine I, Mitchell L, Norman R, Friedl MA, Richardson AD (2014) Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences 11:4305–4320. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4305-2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munger W, Wofsy S, Barford C, Urbanski S (2017) Canopy-atmosphere exchange of carbon, water and energy at Harvard Forest EMS tower since 1991. Harvard Forest data archive: HF004. http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu:8080/exist/apps/datasets/showData.html?id=hf004. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
- O’Keefe J (2015) Phenology of woody species at Harvard Forest since 1990. Harvard forest data archive: HF003. http://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu:8080/exist/apps/datasets/showData.html?id=hf003. Accessed 10 Dec 2017
- Piao S, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P et al (2007) Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 21. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GB002888
- Piao S, Ciais P, Friedlingstein P, Peylin P, Reichstein M, Luyssaert S, Margolis H, Fang J, Barr A, Chen A, Grelle A, Hollinger DY, Laurila T, Lindroth A, Richardson AD, Vesala T (2008) Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature 451:49–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richardson AD, Anderson RS, Arain MA, Barr AG, Bohrer G, Chen G, Chen JM, Ciais P, Davis KJ, Desai AR, Dietze MC, Dragoni D, Garrity SR, Gough CM, Grant R, Hollinger DY, Margolis HA, McCaughey H, Migliavacca M, Monson RK, Munger JW, Poulter B, Raczka BM, Ricciuto DM, Sahoo AK, Schaefer K, Tian H, Vargas R, Verbeeck H, Xiao J, Xue Y (2012) Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the north American carbon program site synthesis. Glob Chang Biol 18:566–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02562.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richardson AD, Hufkens K, Milliman T, Aubrecht DM, Chen M, Gray JM, Johnston MR, Keenan TF, Klosterman ST, Kosmala M, Melaas EK, Friedl MA, Frolking S (2018) Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse north American biomes using PhenoCam imagery. Sci Data 5:180028. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Westergaard-Nielsen A, Lund M, Pedersen SH, Schmidt NM, Klosterman S, Abermann J, Hansen BU (2017) Transitions in high-Arctic vegetation growth patterns and ecosystem productivity tracked with automated cameras from 2000 to 2013. Ambio 46:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0864-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar