Advertisement

Evaluation of microclimates and assessment of thermal comfort of Panthera leo in the Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya

  • Satyajit GhoshEmail author
  • Dhruv Gangadharan Arvind
  • Steven Dobbie
Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Quantifying comfort levels of lions within the Masai Mara National Reserve in Kenya is the main focus of this study. Its discourse delineates step by step the process of quantifying comfort levels of lions within the Mara. Resource-efficient measures for humans in the built environment have long been developed through the creation of passive zones and modulated ventilation. In an analogous manner, new procedures are being adapted for creating optimized microclimates in natural game reserves. This involves CFD (computational fluid dynamics)-inspired landscaping. It is seen that the predicted mean vote (PMV) values—measures of thermal comfort—exceed the expected comfortable ranges suitable for normal functioning of lions in the reserve. This calls for a detailed exploration on sustainable development of this sanctuary. The paper illustrates how modern tools in computational fluid dynamics can be used along with standard ecological models to ascertain the optimal extent of airflow, levels of hydration, and land use pattern changes affecting the prevailing microclimate.

Keywords

Game reserve resource efficiency Airflow Thermal comfort Habitat preference Microclimate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted after a personal visit to the Masai Mara National Reserve, organized by Mr. Binod Sharma at the United Nations in Nairobi. The authors humbly thank VIT University, Vellore, India, and University of Leeds, UK, for making this research possible and for providing an intellectual space for the betterment of wildlife conservation. The Masai people are sincerely thanked for the upkeep and maintenance of their natural heritage and are held in reverence. Thanks are also due to Mr. Siddharth Gumber.

References

  1. ASHRAE 55 (2004) Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. (Supersedes ANSI/ASHRAEStandard 55 (1992))Google Scholar
  2. Auliciems A (1981) Towards a psycho-physiological model of thermal perception. Int J Biometeorol 25:109–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axarli K, Chatzidimitriou A (2012) Redesigning urban open spaces based on bioclimatic criteria: two squares in Thessaloniki, Greece. Proceedings of PLEA2012, Lima, PeruGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer H, Chapron G, Nowell K, Henschel P, Funston P, Hunter LTB, Macdonald DW, Packer C (2015) Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:14894–14899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belcher SE, Hunt JCR (1998) Turbulent flow over hills and waves. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 30:507–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belsky AJ, Amundson RG, Duxbury JM, Riha SJ, Ali AR, Mwonga SM (1989) The effects of trees on their physical, chemical and biological environments in a semi-arid savanna in Kenya. J Appl Ecol 26:1005–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkovic S, Yezioro A, Bitan A (2012) Study of thermal comfort in courtyards in a hot arid climate. Sol Energy 86:1173–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bitsuamlak GT, Stathopoulos T, Bedard C (2004) Numerical evaluation of wind flow over complex terrain: review. J Aerosp Eng 17:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britter RE, Hunt JCR, Richards KJ (1981) Airflow over a two-dimensional hill: studies of velocity speed-up, roughness effects and turbulence. Q J R Meteorol Soc 107:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. BS EN ISO 7730:1995 (1995) Moderate thermal environments, determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfortGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen J, Saunders SC, Crow TR, Naiman RJ, Brosofske KD, Mroz GD, Brookshire BL, Franklin JF (1999) Microclimate in forest ecosystem and landscape ecology variations in local climate can be used to monitor and compare the effects of different management regimes. BioScience 49:288–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cionco RM (1965) A mathematical model for air flow in a vegetative canopy. J Appl Meteorol 4:517–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cracknell AP, Varotsos CA (2007) Editorial and cover: fifty years after the first artificial satellite: from Sputnik 1 to ENVISAT. Int J Remote Sens 28(10):2071–2072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Efstathiou MN, Varotsos CA (2010) On the altitude dependence of the temperature scaling behaviour at the global troposphere. Int J Remote Sens 31(2):343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fanger PO (1972) Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Homewood K, Lambin EF, Coast E, Kariuki A, Kikula I, Kivelia J, Said M, Serneels S, Thompson M (2001) Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: pastoralism, population, or policies. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:12544–12549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huttner S, Bruse M (2009) Numerical modeling of the urban climate—a preview on ENVI-met 4.0. 7th International Conference on Urban Climate ICUC-7, Yokohama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson PS, Hunt JCR (1975) Turbulent wind flow over a low hill. Q J R Meteorol Soc 101:929–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaufmann RV (1976) The development of the range land areas. In: Heyer J, Maitha J, Senga W (eds) Agricultural development in Kenya: an economic assessment. Oxford University Press, Nairobi, pp 255–287Google Scholar
  20. Mahrt L (2000) Surface heterogeneity and vertical structure of the boundary layer. Bound-Layer Meteorol 96:33–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Michalakes J, Chen S, Dudhia J, Hart L, Klemp J, Middlecoff J, Skamarock W (2001) Development of a next generation regional weather research and forecast model, Developments in Teracomputing: Proceedings of the Ninth ECMWF Workshop on the use of high performance computing in meteorology, World ScientificGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishimura N, Nomura T, Iyota H, Kimoto S (1998) Novel water facilities for creation of comfortable urban micrometeorology. Sol Energy 64:197–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ogutu JO, Piepho HP, Dublin HT, Bhola N, Reid RS (2009) Dynamics of Mara–Serengeti ungulates in relation to land use changes. J Zool 278(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oke TR (2002) Boundary layer climates. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oke TR, Cleugh HA (1987) Urban heat storage derived as energy balance residuals. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 39:233–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perry DA (1994) Forest ecosystems. JHU Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  27. Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robitu M, Musy M, Inard C, Groleau D (2006) Modeling the influence of vegetation and water pond on urban microclimate. Sol Energy 80:435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santamouris M (2014) Cooling the cities—a review of reflective and green roof mitigation technologies to fight heat island and improve comfort in urban environments. Sol Energy 103:682–703 ISSN 0038-092XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shirley HL (1929) The influence of light intensity and light quality upon the growth of plants. Am J Bot 16:354–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sindiga I (1984) Land and population problems in Kajiado and Narok, Kenya. Afr Stud Rev 27:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Atmospheric Sciences Library, Dordrecht; Kluwer Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Young T, Finegan E, Brown RD (2013) Effects of summer microclimates on behavior of lions and tigers in zoos. Int J Biometeorol 57:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISB 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringVIT UniversityVelloreIndia
  2. 2.School of Earth and EnvironmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  3. 3.School of Biosciences and TechnologyVIT UniversityVelloreIndia
  4. 4.School of Geography and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations