Effective conductivity in steady well-type flows through porous formations

  • Gerardo SeverinoEmail author
Original Paper


A steady flow generated by a well of given strength takes place in a two-dimensional heterogeneous porous formation where the conductivity K is modeled as a random space function (RSF). As a consequence, the flow-variables become RSF s, and we wish to compute the effective conductivity (EC) by means of the self-consistent approximation. Toward this aim, the porous formation is sought as a collection of circular, non overlapping, inclusions with different (and statistically independent) conductivities. We compute the EC by adapting a procedure which was originally developed for mean uniform flows. Overall, the EC is found to be position-dependent, and therefore it can not be regarded as a medium’s property (unless one is dealing with large distances from the well). Then, it is shown how results of the present study can be used for practical applications.


Porous media Sink-flow Heterogeneity Stochastic modelling Self-consistent approximation Effective conductivity 



The constructive comments from three anonymous Referees were deeply appreciated, and they have significantly improved the early version of the manuscript. The author thanks Giovanna Ameno (Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples - Federico II, Italy) for the valuable assistance during the literature review.


  1. Bear J (2013) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. Courier Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beran JM (1968) Statistical continuum theories. Interscience, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Comegna A, Coppola A, Comegna V, Severino G, Sommella A, Vitale C (2010) State-space approach to evaluate spatial variability of field measured soil water status along a line transect in a volcanic-vesuvian soil. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:2455–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dagan G (1979) Models of groundwater flow in statistically homogeneous porous formations. Water Resour Res 15:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dagan G (1981) Analysis of flow through heterogeneous random aquifers by the method of embedding matrix: 1. steady flow. Water Resour Res 17:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dagan G (1989) Flow and transport in porous formations. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dagan G, Fiori A, Jankovic I (2013) Upscaling of flow in heterogeneous porous formations: critical examination and issues of principle. Adv Water Resour 51:67–85 (35th Year Anniversary Issue)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Di Dato M, Fiori A, de Barros FP, Bellin A (2017) Radial solute transport in highly heterogeneous aquifers: modeling and experimental comparison. Water Resour Res 53:5725–5741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fallico C, De Bartolo S, Veltri M, Severino G (2016) On the dependence of the saturated hydraulic conductivity upon the effective porosity through a power law model at different scales. Hydrol Process 30:2366–2372. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fallico C, Ianchello M, De Bartolo S, Severino G (2018) Spatial dependence of the hydraulic conductivity in a well-type configuration at the mesoscale. Hydrol Process 15:590–595. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fiori A, Jankovic I, Dagan G (2003) Flow and transport through two-dimensional isotropic media of binary conductivity distribution. Part 1: numerical methodology and semi-analytical solutions. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 17:370–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez S, Severino G, Randazzo L, Toraldo G, Otero J (2009) Identification of the hydraulic conductivity using a global optimization method. Agric Water Manag 96:504–510.
  13. Hashin Z, Shtrikman S (1962) A variational approach to the theory of the effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials. J Appl Phys 33:3125–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Indelman P (1996) Averaging of unsteady flows in heterogeneous media of stationary conductivity. J Fluid Mech 310:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Indelman P (2001) Steady-state source flow in heterogeneous porous media. Transp Porous Med 45:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Indelman P, Abramovich B (1994) Nonlocal properties of nonuniform averaged flows in heterogeneous media. Water Resour Res 30:3385–3393. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jankovic I, Fiori A, Dagan G (2003) Effective conductivity of an isotropic heterogeneous medium of lognormal conductivity distribution. Multisc Model Simul 1:40–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jankovic I, Maghrebi M, Fiori A, Dagan G (2017) When good statistical models of aquifer heterogeneity go right: the impact of aquifer permeability structures on 3d flow and transport. Adv Water Resour 100:199–211. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanaun S, Levin V (2007) Self-consistent methods for composites: static problems. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Milne-Thomson L (1940) Hydrodynamical images. In: Mathematical proceedings of the Cambridge philosophical society, Cambridge University Press, pp 246–247Google Scholar
  21. Milne-Thomson LM (1968) Theoretical Hydrodynamics. Courier Corporation, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milton GW (2002) The theory of composites. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Renard P, De Marsily G (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review. Adv Water Resour 20:253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rubin Y (2003) Applied stochastic hydrogeology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  25. Sahimi M (2003) Heterogeneous materials I: linear transport and optical properties. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  26. Severino G (2011a) Macrodispersion by point-like source flows in randomly heterogeneous porous media. Transp Porous Med 89:121–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Severino G (2011b) Stochastic analysis of well-type flows in randomly heterogeneous porous formations. Water Resources Research 47:W03520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Severino G, Comegna A, Coppola A, Sommella A, Santini A (2010) Stochastic analysis of a field-scale unsaturated transport experiment. Adv Water Resour 33:1188–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Severino G, Coppola A (2012) A note on the apparent conductivity of stratified porous media in unsaturated steady flow above a water table. Transp Porous Med 91:733–740. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Severino G, Cvetkovic V, Coppola A (2005) On the velocity covariance for steady flows in heterogeneous porous formations and its application to contaminants transport. Comput Geosci 9:155–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Severino G, De Bartolo S, Toraldo G, Srinivasan G, Viswanathan H (2012) Travel time approach to kinetically sorbing solute by diverging radial flows through heterogeneous porous formations. Water Resour Res.
  32. Severino G, Santini A (2005) On the effective hydraulic conductivity in mean vertical unsaturated steady flows. Adv Water Resour 28:964–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Severino G, Santini A, Sommella A (2003) Determining the soil hydraulic conductivity by means of a field scale internal drainage. J Hydrol 273:234–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Severino G, Santini A, Sommella A (2008) Steady flows driven by sources of random strength in heterogeneous aquifers with application to partially penetrating wells. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 22:567–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Severino G, Santini A, Sommella A (2011) Macrodispersion by diverging radial flows in randomly heterogeneous porous media. J Contam Hydrol 123:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shvidler MI (1964) Filtration flows in heterogeneous media. Consultants Bureau, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Tartakovsky DM, Guadagnini A, Riva M (2003) Stochastic averaging of nonlinear flows in heterogeneous porous media. J Fluid Mech 492:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Torquato S (2013) Random heterogeneous materials: microstructure and macroscopic properties. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Wheatcraft SW, Winterberg F (1985) Steady state flow passing through a cylinder of permeability different from the surrounding medium. Water Resour Res 21:1923–1929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zarlenga A, Janković I, Fiori A, Dagan G (2018) Effective hydraulic conductivity of three-dimensional heterogeneous formations of lognormal permeability distribution: The impact of connectivity. Water Resour Res 54:2480–2486. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Water Resources Management and Biosystems Engineering, Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of Naples - Federico IIPortici, NaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations