Advertisement

A multi-risk assessment framework for agricultural land use optimization

  • Haojie Cui
  • Ping GuoEmail author
  • Mo Li
  • Shanshan Guo
  • Fan Zhang
Original Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Uncertainties and risks in agricultural land use allocation may affect agricultural sustainable development, which leads to the necessity to effectively assess risks when optimally allocating agricultural land use. In this study, a framework of multi-risk assessment for agricultural land use allocation was developed. In the decision-making of agricultural land use optimization, the developed framework is capable of fully describing multiple risks using uncertainty methodology, including fuzzy, stochastic and interval methods. Moreover, the framework can help managers fully understand risks associated with various water supply scenarios, targets and optimization schemes of agricultural land use optimization. A real-world case study in Minqin, northwest of China was conducted to demonstrate the feasibility and practicability of the developed framework. The runoff volume of Caiqi was divided into five intervals by interior-outer-set model which represents risk levels in risk assessment of water supply. Then, results of agricultural land use allocation expressed by Shannon information entropy of water use structure and relevant optimal targets were obtained by Monte Carlo method. Sensitivity analysis on water use efficiency, available cultivated area and the ratio of grain crops to commercial crops will help decision makers better understand the potential risk conditions and then provide guidance in choosing suitable plans of agricultural land use.

Keywords

Multi-risk assessment Agricultural land use allocation Uncertainty Risk prevention 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51439006 and 51621061).

References

  1. Buckley JJ, Qu YX (1990) On using alpha-cuts to evaluate fuzzy equations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 38:309–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(90)90204-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chaudhary A, Hantush MM (2017) Bayesian Monte Carlo and maximum likelihood approach for uncertainty estimation and risk management: application to lake oxygen recovery model. Water Res 108:301–311.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duflo E (2014) The historically evolving impact of the Ogallala aquifer: agricultural adaptation to groundwater and drought. Am Econ J Appl Econ 6:190–219.  https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.1.190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feng LH, Luo GY (2009) Analysis on fuzzy risk of landfall typhoon in Zhejiang province of China. Math Comput Simul 79:3258–3266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu W, Shao D, Huang X, Dai T (2009) Multi-objective risk assessment on water resources optimal allocation. Adv Water Resour Hydraul Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_64 Google Scholar
  6. Gui ZY (2016) Risk analysis of water resources system for minqin under uncertainties. Dissertation, China Agricultural University (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. Gui ZY, Zhang CL, Li M, Guo P (2015) Risk analysis methods of the water resources system under uncertainty. Front Agric Sci Eng 2:205.  https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2015073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gui ZY, Li M, Guo P (2017) Simulation-based inexact fuzzy semi-infinite programming method for agricultural cultivated area planning in the Shiyang River Basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 143:05016011.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Ir.1943-4774.0001118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo P, Huang G (2009) Two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained programming: application to water resources management under dual uncertainties. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 23:349–359.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-008-0221-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guo P, Huang GH (2010) Interval-parameter semi-infinite fuzzy-stochastic mixed-integer programming approach for environmental management under multiple uncertainties. Waste Manag 30:521–531.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo H, Moore RD (1993) Grey linear programming, its solving approach, and its application. Int J Syst Sci 24:159–172.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00207729308949477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang CF (1997) Principle of information diffusion. Fuzzy Sets Syst 91:69–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(96)00257-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang CF (2002) An application of calculated fuzzy risk. Inf Sci 142:37–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00156-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang CF, Inoue H (2007) Soft risk maps of natural disasters and their applications to decision-making. Inf Sci 177:1583–1592.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2006.07.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang CZ, Nie S, Guo L, Fan YR (2017a) Inexact fuzzy stochastic chance constraint programming for emergency evacuation in qinshan nuclear power plant under uncertainty. J Environ Inf 30:63–78.  https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201700372 Google Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Ma G, Li J (2017b) Multi-level explosion risk analysis (MLERA) for accidental gas explosion events in super-large FLNG facilities. J Loss Prev Process Ind 45:242–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Flores F, Moneo M (2007) Challenges to manage the risk of water scarcity and climate change in the Mediterranean. Water Resour Manag 21:775–788.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9111-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan UT, Valeo C (2017) Comparing a Bayesian and fuzzy number approach to uncertainty quantification in short-term dissolved oxygen prediction. J Environ Inf 30:1–16.  https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201700371 Google Scholar
  20. Li Q (2013) Fuzzy approach to analysis of flood risk based on variable fuzzy sets and improved information diffusion methods. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:239–249.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-13-239-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li M, Guo P (2014) A multi-objective optimal allocation model for irrigation water resources under multiple uncertainties. Appl Math Model 38:4897–4911.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li M, Guo P (2015) A coupled random fuzzy two-stage programming model for crop area optimization—a case study of the middle Heihe River basin, China. Agric Water Manag 155:53–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li YP, Huang GH, Sun W (2011) Management of uncertain information for environmental systems using a multistage fuzzy-stochastic programming model with soft constraints. J Environ Inf 18:28–37.  https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201100196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li M, Guo P, Singh VP (2016a) An efficient irrigation water allocation model under uncertainty. Agric Syst 144:46–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li M, Guo P, Singh VP, Yang GQ (2016b) An uncertainty-based framework for agricultural water-land resources allocation and risk evaluation. Agric Water Manag 177:10–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li M, Guo P, Zhang LD, Zhang CL (2016c) Uncertain and multi-objective programming models for crop planting structure optimization. Front Agric Sci Eng 3:34.  https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2016084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li YP, Nie S, Huang CZ, McBean EA, Fan YR, Huang GH (2017) An integrated risk analysis method for planning water resource systems to support sustainable development of an arid region. J Environ Inf 29:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201700359 Google Scholar
  28. Lind N (2013) Accountability, risk, and the ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) limit of benefit. J Risk Reliab 228:209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006X13512631 Google Scholar
  29. Liu J, Li YP, Huang GH, Zhuang XW, Fu HY (2017) Assessment of uncertainty effects on crop planning and irrigation water supply using a Monte Carlo simulation based dual-interval stochastic programming method. J Clean Prod 149:945–967.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma LH (2012) Data-driven model of the water use and water uniform-scarcity risk analysis in Shiyang River Basin. Dissertation, Northwest A&F University (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Nakahara Y, Sasaki M, Gen M (1992) On the linear-programming problems with interval-coefficients. Comput Ind Eng 23:301–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(92)90121-Y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nemzer LR (2017) Shannon information entropy in the canonical genetic code. J Theor Biol 415:158–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parks PJ (1995) Explaining irrational land-use—risk-aversion and marginal agricultural land. J Environ Econ Manag 28:34–47.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ren CF, Li RH, Zhang LD, Guo P (2016) Multiobjective stochastic fractional goal programming model for water resources optimal allocation among industries. J Water Resour Plan Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(Asce)Wr.1943-5452.0000681 Google Scholar
  35. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Singh A (2015) Land and water management planning for increasing farm income in irrigated dry areas. Land Use Policy 42:244–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Suh D, Yoon S, Jeon S, Ryu K (2011) Weighting method based on entropy analysis for multi-sensor data fusion in wireless sensor networks. Database Theory Appl Biosci Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27157-1_5 Google Scholar
  38. Yagi H (2008) An empirical application of the linear programming model for agricultural land use planning through the valuation of negative externalities caused by abandoning farmland in marginal areas. Jpn J Rural Econ 10:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang GQ, Guo P, Li M, Fang SQ, Zhang LD (2016) An improved solving approach for interval-parameter programming and application to an optimal allocation of irrigation water problem. Water Resour Manag 30:701–729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1186-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng XT, Kang SZ, Li FS, Zhang L, Guo P (2010) Fuzzy multi-objective linear programming applying to crop area planning. Agric Water Manag 98:134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang J, Huang C (2005) Cartographic representation of the uncertainty related to natural disaster risk: overview and state of the Art. Data mining and knowledge management. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30537-8_23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang CL, Li M, Guo P (2017) Trend detection and stochastic simulation prediction of streamflow at Yingluoxia hydrological station, Heihe River Basin, China. Front Agric Sci Eng.  https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2016112 Google Scholar
  43. Zou Q, Zhou J, Zhou C, Song L, Guo J, Liu Y (2012a) The practical research on flood risk analysis based on IIOSM and fuzzy α-cut technique. Appl Math Model 36:3271–3282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zou Q, Zhou JZ, Zhou C, Guo J, Deng WP, Yang MQ, Liao L (2012b) Fuzzy risk analysis of flood disasters based on diffused-interior-outer-set model. Expert Syst Appl 39:6213–6220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haojie Cui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ping Guo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mo Li
    • 3
  • Shanshan Guo
    • 1
  • Fan Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Agricultural Water Research in ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Wujiang Water Resources Bureau, Water Conservancy Project Management DepartmentSuzhouChina
  3. 3.School of Water Conservancy & Civil EngineeringNortheast Agricultural UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations