Advertisement

Trees

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Pioneer root invasion and fibrous root development into disturbed soil space observed with a flatbed scanner method

  • Ryo NakahataEmail author
Original Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Key Message

Fine roots with thick diameter preferentially elongated into disturbed soil space, indicating positive invasion of pioneer roots that recolonize distal root systems.

Abstract

Fine roots and their morphological traits are related to below-ground resource dynamics at physiological and ecological levels. Established approaches for investigating fine root dynamics inevitably cause artificial soil disturbance due to root excavation or instrument installation into the soil. Soil disturbance can have considerable effects on fine root dynamics. The aim of the present study was to clarify the temporal changes of morphological traits of fine roots produced after soil disturbance. The flatbed scanner method was employed in cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) and deciduous oak (Quercus serrata Thunb.) stands, and changes in length and diameter of elongated roots were measured for 4 years after soil disturbance. In both stands, specific trends of diameter and length production of fine roots were observed. Root length production increased extensively, and diameter was greater in an initial phase after soil disturbance. However, temporal patterns varied between the two stands. Soil disturbance affected fine root dynamics for a longer duration in the cypress stand, but more intensively in the oak stand. These results indicate that soil disturbance can affect fine root morphology and can induce invasion of thick fine roots, which are traditionally grouped as pioneer roots. Moreover, the results showed high length production continued for a longer period than that of larger diameter roots, suggesting recolonization of fine root systems by elongating pioneer roots followed by the branching of absorptive fibrous roots in order to recover root uptake capacity lost due to soil disturbance.

Keywords

Fine root Morphology Pioneer root Scanner method Soil disturbance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank T. Miyaura and Satoyama Research Center of Ryukoku University who allowed us the use of Ryukoku Forest for data and sample collection. A. Osawa is gratefully acknowledged for creating the study environment, providing image data of fine roots and correcting my manuscript. Fellow students, including J. An, H. Schäfer, Y. Kameda, H. Nakamura, K. Hattori, A. Kawamura, M. Ishii, helped various aspects of the study particularly for image acquisition by root scanners or stand measurement. Y. Kameda also supported me for the image analysis. In addition, I am grateful to M. Dannoura for giving useful comments and checking the manuscript in the process of revising, and I would like to thank Editage for English language editing.

Funding

The present study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid of Scientific Research no. 16 J10182 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science to R. N. (DC1).

Supplementary material

468_2020_1953_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (785 kb)
Supplementary file1 (PDF 784 kb)

References

  1. Addo-Danso SD, Prescott CE, Smith AR (2016) Methods for estimating root biomass and production in forest and woodland ecosystem carbon studies: a review. For Ecol Manag 359:332–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.08.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caplan JS, Meiners SJ, Flores-Moreno H, McCormack ML (2019) Fine-root traits are linked to species dynamics in a successional plant community. Ecology 100:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2588 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dannoura M, Kominami Y, Oguma H, Kanazawa Y (2008) The development of an optical scanner method for observation of plant root dynamics. Plant Root 2:14–18.  https://doi.org/10.3117/plantroot.2.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ding Y, Leppälammi-Kujansuu J, Helmisaari HS (2019) Fine root longevity and below- and aboveground litter production in a boreal Betula pendula forest. For Ecol Manag 431:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eissenstat DM (1991) On the relationship between specific root length and the rate of root proliferation: a field study using citrus rootstocks. New Phytol 118:63–68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00565.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eissenstat DM, Achor DS (1999) Anatomical characteristics of roots of citrus rootstocks that vary in specific root length. New Phytol 141:309–321.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00342.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eissenstat DM, Caldwell MM (1989) Invasive root growth into disturbed soil of two tussock grasses that differ in competitive effectiveness. Funct Ecol 3:345.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2389375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finér L, Messier C, De Grandpré L (1997) Fine-root dynamics in mixed boreal conifer—broad-leafed forest stands at different successional stages after fire. Can J For Res 27:304–314.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x96-170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo D, Li H, Mitchell RJ et al (2008) Fine root heterogeneity by branch order : resolving the discrepancy in root longevity and turnover estimates between minirhizotron and C isotopic methods. New Phytol 177:443–456.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02242.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Head GC (1973) Shedding of roots. In: Shedding Plant Parts, pp 237–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1993) The dynamics of fine root length, biomass, and nitrogen content in two northern hardwood ecosystems. Can J For Res 23:2507–2520.  https://doi.org/10.1139/x93-312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hishi T (2007) Heterogeneity of individual roots within the fine root architecture: causal links between physiological and ecosystem functions. J For Res 12:126–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-006-0260-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hishi T, Takeda H (2005) Dynamics of heterorhizic root systems: protoxylem groups within the fine-root system of Chamaecyparis obtusa. New Phytol 167:509–521.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01418.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Janssens IA, Sampson DA, Curiel-Yuste J et al (2002) The carbon cost of fine root turnover in a Scots pine forest. For Ecol Manag 168:231–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00755-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson MG, Tingey DT, Phillips DL, Storm MJ (2001) Advancing fine root research with minirhizotrons. Environ Exp Bot 45:263–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joslin JD, Wolfe MH (1999) Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:218–221.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300010031x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joslin JD, Gaudinski JB, Torn MS et al (2006) Fine-root turnover patterns and their relationship to root diameter and soil depth in a 14 C-labeled hardwood forest. New Phytol 172(3):523–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma Z, Guo D, Xu X et al (2018) Evolutionary history resolves global organization of root functional traits. Nature 555:94–97.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25783 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Malhi Y, Doughty C, Galbraith D (2011) The allocation of ecosystem net primary productivity in tropical forests. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366:3225–3245.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mason GF, Bhar DS, Hilton RJ (1970) Root growth studies on Mugho pine. Can J Bot 48:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCormack ML, Dickie IA, Eissenstat DM et al (2015) Redefining fine roots improves understanding of below-ground contributions to terrestrial biosphere processes. New Phytol 207:505–518.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13363 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Milchunas DG (2009) Estimating root production: Comparison of 11 methods in shortgrass steppe and review of biases. Ecosystems 12:1381–1402.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9295-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Miyaura T (2009) Forest changes at Seta Hill after the World War II. A 2008 Report of the Satoyama Regional Symbiosis Studies Open Research Center, Ryukoku University (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  24. Montagnoli A, Terzaghi M, Giussani B et al (2018) An integrated method for high-resolution definition of new diameter-based fine root sub-classes of Fagus sylvatica L. Ann For Sci 75:76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Montagnoli A, Dumroese RK, Terzaghi M et al (2019) Seasonality of fine root dynamics and activity of root and shoot vascular cambium in a Quercus ilex L. forest (Italy). For Ecol Manag 431:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW (1992) Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73:1139–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nakahata R, Osawa A (2017) Fine root dynamics after soil disturbance evaluated with a root scanner method. Plant Soil.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3361-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips RP, Brzostek E, Midgley MG (2013) The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon-nutrient couplings in temperate forests. New Phytol 199:41–51.  https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12221 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pregitzer K, DeForest J, Burton AJ et al (2002) Fine root architecture of nine North American trees. Ecol Monogr 72:293–309.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0293:FRAONN]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Price JS, Hendrick RL (1998) Fine root length production, mortality and standing root crop dynamics in an intensively managed sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) coppice. Plant Soil 205:193–201.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004324714371 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rewald B, Raveh E, Gendler T et al (2012) Phenotypic plasticity and water flux rates of Citrus root orders under salinity. J Exp Bot 63:2717–2727.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err457 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Burton AJ et al (2003) Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon cycling in black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecol Monogr 73:643–662.  https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott DW, Terrell GR (1987) Biased and unbiased cross-valiadation in density estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 82:1131–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith SE, Read DJ (2010) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Steingrobe B, Schmid H, Claassen N (2000) The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops—influence of soil conditions inside the ingrowth core on root growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:617–622.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2624(200012)163:6%3c617:AID-JPLN617%3e3.0.CO;2-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Steingrobe B, Schmid H, Claassen N (2001) The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops—influence of soil and root disturbance during installation of the bags on root ingrowth into the cores. Eur J Agron 15:143–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00100-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Smemo KA, Blackwood CB (2015) Fine root morphology is phylogenetically structured, but nitrogen is related to the plant economics spectrum in temperate trees. Funct Ecol 29:796–807.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vamerali T, Bandiera M, Mosca G (2012) Minirhizotrons in modern root studies. In: Mancuso S (ed) Measuring roots: an updated approach. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogt KA, Vogt DJ, Palmiotto PA et al (1995) Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant Soil Int J Plant Soil Relatsh 187:159–219Google Scholar
  40. Wand MP, Jones MC (1994) Kernel smoothing. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood SN (2003) Thin plate regression splines. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 65:95–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xia M, Guo D, Pregitzer KS (2010) Ephemeral root modules in fraxinus mandshurica. New Phytol 188:1065–1074.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03423.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Yamato M, Iwase K (2005) Community analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a warm-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest and introduction of the fungal community into the seedlings of indigenous woody plants. Mycoscience 46:334–342.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-005-0256-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zadworny M, Eissenstat DM (2011) Contrasting the morphology, anatomy and fungal colonization of new pioneer and fibrous roots. New Phytol 190:213–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03598.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Forest and Biomaterials Science, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of ScienceTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations