Physiological and metabolic responses of Salix sinopurpurea and Salix suchowensis to drought stress
- 15 Downloads
Physiological and metabolic analysis showed the difference in drought tolerance and revealed the common and specific metabolic regulations in Salix sinopurpurea and Salix suchowensis.
Willows (Salix spp.) are important woody plants as promising sources for sustainable and renewable biomass. However, drought is highly detrimental to their growth and development. Deciphering the adaptation mechanism of willows to drought will provide a theoretical basis for the cultivation of drought-tolerant varieties. In this work, we investigated the physiological and metabolic responses to drought stress in Salix sinopurpurea and Salix suchowensis. The drought experiment was conducted on clonal plants from cuttings of the two willow species under greenhouse conditions. S. sinopurpurea exhibited higher drought tolerance, as evidenced by lower growth reduction, and higher leaf relative water content, water use efficiency and net photosynthesis rate than those of S. suchowensis under the same drought conditions. Metabolic profiling identified 67 and 64 differentially accumulated metabolites in S. sinopurpurea and S. suchowensis, respectively. These metabolites function as compatible solutes and energy reserves and in antioxidant protection to defend against drought stress. Carbohydrate, amino acid and lipid metabolic pathways were central in the metabolic regulations of the drought response in the two willow species. The accumulation of aspartate, glutamate, serine, threonine, and sedoheptulose particularly in S. sinopurpurea might equip this species with drought tolerance. Meanwhile, phenylalanine and phytosterols were specifically inhibited in S. suchowensis, which might be associated with its susceptibility to drought stress. Taken together, these results provide a framework for better understanding the metabolic responses of willow to drought stress.
KeywordsWillow Drought physiology Metabolomics Compatible solutes Antioxidants
This work was supported by National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of CAF (CAFYBB2017ZY008) and (CAFYBB2018ZY001-9), and Natural Science Foundation of China (31800570).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing or financial interests.
- Argus GW (2007) Salix (Salicaceae) distribution maps and a synopsis of their classification in North America, North of Mexico. Harvard Pap Bot 12(2):335–368. https://doi.org/10.3100/1043-4534(2007)12[335:SSDMAA]2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Javier SM, Jim H, Alison KS et al (2015) A metabolomic study in oats (Avena sativa) highlights a drought tolerance mechanism based on salicylate signalling pathways and the modulation of carbon, antioxidant and photo-oxidative metabolism. Plant Cell Environ 38(7):1434–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li Z, Yu J, Peng Y et al (2017) Metabolic pathways regulated by abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and γ-aminobutyric acid in association with improved drought tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera). Physiol Plant 159(1):42–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12483 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma L, Wang Y, Liu W et al (2014) Overexpression of an alfalfa GDP-mannose 3, 5-epimerase gene enhances acid, drought and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis by increasing ascorbate accumulation. Biotechnol Lett 36:2331–2341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-014-1598-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramanjulu S, Sudhakar C (1997) Drought tolerance is partly related to amino acid accumulation and ammonia assimilation: a comparative study in two mulberry genotypes differing in drought sensitivity. J Plant Physiol 150(3):345–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(97)80131-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Volk TA, Berguson B, Daly C et al (2018) Poplar and shrub willow energy crops in the United States: field trial results from the multiyear regional feedstock partnership and yield potential maps based on the PRISM-ELM model. GCB Bioenergy 10:735–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar