Floral development and the formation of functionally unisexual flowers in Xanthoceras sorbifolium (Sapindaceae), a morphologically andromonoecious tree endemic to northern China
- 92 Downloads
Xanthoceras sorbifolium is apparently andromonoecious but exhibits a cryptically monoecious breeding system. Sexual differentiation in male and functional female flowers occurs 2 weeks before flowering.
Individual trees of Xanthoceras sorbifolium bear male and morphologically bisexual flowers but functionally female flowers, and show labile sex expression. Investigations of the floral development are of significant value for understanding the breeding system and elucidating the systematic relationships. We studied floral development of male and bisexual flowers using scanning electron and light microscopy. The early stages of floral development were essentially the same, and all floral organ primordia were initiated in the two types of flowers of X. sorbifolium. Later, the stamens in bisexual flowers and the gynoecium in male flowers were aborted. We divided floral development into nine stages. Morphological differences between male and bisexual flowers appeared first at stage 8, when the style elongated obviously and the stigma papillae began to expand in the bisexual flowers but not in the male flowers. Ovule development was arrested shortly after formation of megaspore mother cells or during meiosis in the male flowers, whereas anther development was aberrant in the bisexual flowers. Morphologically bisexual flowers of X. sorbifolium do not have male function and are functionally female. Comparison of floral developmental characters did not support the separation of the Chinese monotypic genus Xanthoceras from the family Sapindaceae.
KeywordsFloral development Andromonoecy Monoecy Systematic relationship Xanthoceras sorbifolium
We would like to thank Xiuping Xu, Jie Wen, and Fengqin Dong for technical help. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (30972344, 31370611 and 31570680) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (6172028).
- Acevedo-Rodríguez P, van Welzen PC, Adema F, van der Ham RWJM (2010) Sapindaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) Flowering plants, Eudicots: Sapindales, Cucurbitales, Myrtaceae. The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 10. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
- Buerki S, Forest F, Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Callmander MW, Nylander JAA, Harrington M, Sanmartín I, Küpfer P, Alvarez N (2009) Plastid and nuclear DNA markers reveal intricate relationships at subfamilial and tribal levels in the soapberry family (Sapindaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 51:238–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buerki S, Porter P, Lowry II, Alvarez N, Razafimandimbison SG, Kuepfer P, Callmander MW (2010) Phylogeny and circumscription of Sapindaceae revisited: molecular sequence data, morphology and biogeography support recognition of a new family, Xanthoceraceae. Plant Ecol Evol 143:148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heslop-Harrison J (1964) Sex expression in flowering plants. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology No. 16, 109-125. Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NYGoogle Scholar
- Richards AJ (1986) Plant breeding systems. George Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Xia NH, Gadek PA (2007) Sapindaceae. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH (eds) Flora of China Vol. 12. Science Press, Beijing.Google Scholar
- Yampolsky C, Yampolsky H (1922) Distribution of sex forms in the phanerogamic flora. Bibl Gen 3:1–62Google Scholar
- Zhou QY, Zheng YR, Lai LM, Du H (2017) Observations on sexual reproduction in Xanthoceras sorbifolium (Sapindaceae). Acta Bot Occid Sin 37:0014–0022Google Scholar